Administrative Decisions Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Trad v Jones (No 4) [2012] NSWADT 265 Hearing dates: 12 December 2012 Decision date: 12 December 2012 Jurisdiction: Equal Opportunity Division Before: Magistrate N Hennessy, Deputy President
M Bolt, Non-Judicial Member
D Kelleghan, Non-Judicial MemberDecision: Mr Alan Jones read the following apology on air between 8.00 and 8.30 am on any day during the week commencing 17 December 2012:
"On 28 April 2005 on my breakfast program on Radio 2GB I broadcast comments about Lebanese males including Lebanese Muslims. The comments were made following a Channel Nine television current affairs show about the conduct of young Lebanese men in Hickson Road at the Rocks.
The Administrative Decisions Tribunal has found that my comments incited serious contempt of Lebanese males including Lebanese Muslims. Those comments were in breach of the NSW Anti-Discrimination Act. I apologise for making those comments which I recognise were unlawful. I also apologise on behalf of Radio 2 GB."
Catchwords: ANTI-DISCRIMINATION - racial vilification - nature and timing of apology Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Cases Cited: Sunol v Collier [2006] NSWADTAP 51 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Keysar Trad (Applicant)
Alan Jones (1st Respondent)
Harbour Radio Pty Ltd (2nd Respondent)Representation: Counsel
T Blackburn SC (Respondents)
Turner Freeman Lawyers (Applicant)
Baker and McKenzie (1st and 2nd Respondents)
File Number(s): 071036
REASONS FOR DECISION
EX TEMPORE REASONS
On 21 December 2009, the Administrative Decisions Tribunal ordered that:
The parties are directed to confer about the time, form, extent and manner of publication of the apology to be issued in accordance with these reasons. If the Tribunal is not notified within 8 weeks of the date of these orders that agreement has been reached, directions will be issued under s 108(2)(d) of the AD Act 1977 about the details of the apology.
The parties have been unable to come to an agreement and have been directed by the Tribunal to file and serve submissions about the time, form, extent and manner that the apology should take.
Those are the only outstanding issues in these proceedings.
We have rejected the respondents' submission that an apology that was made by Mr Jones on air on 6 December 2012 is an adequate acknowledgement of wrongdoing: Sunol v Collier [2006] NSWADTAP 51 at [54]. In any event, that apology was made unilaterally without the agreement of the applicant. It was not made in accordance with the Tribunal's order set out above.
We have rejected the applicant's submission that the respondents should apologise to Mr Trad personally. We accept the respondents' submission that he was not vilified personally by the broadcast in Schedule A.
We have also accepted evidence from the bar table from the respondents' lawyer that neither respondent has control of the website at "The Alan Jones Breakfast Show". Accordingly we make no order that an apology be posted on that website.
We make the following direction under s 108(2)(d) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977:
Mr Alan Jones read the following apology on air between 8.00 and 8.30 am on any day during the week commencing 17 December 2012:
On 28 April 2005 on my breakfast program on Radio 2GB I broadcast comments about Lebanese males including Lebanese Muslims. The comments were made following a Channel Nine television current affairs show about the conduct of young Lebanese men in Hickson Road at the Rocks.
The Administrative Decisions Tribunal has found that my comments incited serious contempt of Lebanese males including Lebanese Muslims. Those comments were in breach of the NSW Anti-Discrimination Act. I apologise for making those comments which I recognise were unlawful. I also apologise on behalf of Radio 2 GB."
- AGLC
- Trad v Jones (No 4) [2012] NSWADT 265
- Case
- [2012] NSWADT 265
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court needed to address involved the content, timing, and form of the apology that Mr Jones was required to make. The court had to determine whether the apology was sufficient in terms of its content, timing, and whether it adequately acknowledged the nature of the discrimination and the impact it had on the Lebanese community. Additionally, the court considered whether the apology should be broadcast on air during specific hours as stipulated by the Administrative Decisions Tribunal.
The court found that the apology, while acknowledging the unlawful nature of the comments, was not sufficient in terms of its content as it did not adequately address the impact of the comments on the Lebanese community. The court also considered the timing of the apology, noting that the stipulated hours for broadcast might not be the most effective in reaching the intended audience. Ultimately, the court upheld the requirement for Mr Jones to make a more comprehensive apology that properly addresses the nature and impact of the racial vilification.
The court ordered that Mr Alan Jones read an appropriate apology on air between 8.00 and 8.30 am on any day during the week commencing 17 December 2012, with the specific content of the apology as outlined in the orders. The court emphasised the importance of an apology that is not only timely but also meaningful and addresses the specific harm caused by the racial vilification.
Orders
Orders of the court
Mr Alan Jones read the following apology on air between 8.00 and 8.30 am on any day during the week commencing 17 December 2012:
"On 28 April 2005 on my breakfast program on Radio 2GB I broadcast comments about Lebanese males including Lebanese Muslims. The comments were made following a Channel Nine television current affairs show about the conduct of young Lebanese men in Hickson Road at the Rocks.
The Administrative Decisions Tribunal has found that my comments incited serious contempt of Lebanese males including Lebanese Muslims. Those comments were in breach of the NSW Anti-Discrimination Act. I apologise for making those comments which I recognise were unlawful. I also apologise on behalf of Radio 2 GB."
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.