Tomlinson v Cut Price Deli Pty Ltd

[1995] FCA 675

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )No. QG 72 of 1991
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY     )
GENERAL DIVISION                 )

BETWEEN:  PETER JOHN TOMLINSON and

JEAN TOMLINSON

Applicants

AND:     CUT PRICE DELI PTY. LIMITED

First Respondent

AND:     ENZO SGAMBELLONE

Second Respondent

AND:HARRY MALOVANY

Third Respondent

AND:PETER HOEFLER

Fourth Respondent

AND:RON HARMER

Fifth Respondent

AND:CUT PRICE DELI PTY. LIMITED

Cross Claimant

AND:PETER JOHN TOMLINSON and

JEAN TOMLINSON

Cross Respondents

MINUTES OF ORDERS

JUDGE MAKING ORDER:         Drummond J
DATE OF ORDER:              29 August, 1995
WHERE MADE:                 Brisbane

BY CONSENT THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. There be judgment for the applicants against the first respondent for $57,355.50 in lieu of the judgment pronounced on 12 July, 1995.

1. There be judgment for the applicants against the second respondent for $203,422.50 in lieu of the judgment pronounced on 18 August, 1995.

1. There be judgment for the applicants against the fourth respondent for $203,422.50 in lieu of the judgment pronounced on 18 August, 1995.

NOTE:     Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )    No. QG 72 of 1991
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY     )
GENERAL DIVISION                 )

BETWEEN:  PETER JOHN TOMLINSON and

JEAN TOMLINSON

Applicants

AND:     CUT PRICE DELI PTY. LIMITED

First Respondent

AND:     ENZO SGAMBELLONE

Second Respondent

AND:HARRY MALOVANY

Third Respondent

AND:PETER HOEFLER

Fourth Respondent

AND:RON HARMER

Fifth Respondent

AND:CUT PRICE DELI PTY. LIMITED

Cross Claimant

AND:PETER JOHN TOMLINSON and

JEAN TOMLINSON

Cross Respondents

Coram:    Drummond J
Dates:    29 August, 1995
Place:    Brisbane

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

An arithmetical error occurred in the calculation of the damages.  The parties are agreed that, instead of the judgments pronounced on 12 July, 1995 and 18 August, 1995, there should be judgment against the first respondent for $57,355.50 and judgment against the second respondent for $203,422.50 and judgment against the fourth respondent for $203,422.50.

I certify that this and the preceding
1 page are a true copy of the
reasons for judgment herein of the
Honourable Justice Drummond.

Associate:

Date:        29 August, 1995