Thomas and Repatriation Commission

Case [2003] AATA 65


Administrative

Appeals

Tribunal

 

DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2003] AATA 65

ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL      )

)          No N2001/396

VETERANS' APPEALS  DIVISION )
Re HILDA THOMAS

Applicant

And

REPATRIATION COMMISSION

Respondent

DECISION

Tribunal Dr J D Campbell, Member

Date23 January 2003

PlaceSydney

Decision The Tribunal determines that the decision under review be affirmed.

[SGD] Dr J D Campbell   Member

CATCHWORDS

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS - war widow pension - war caused death - B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of duodenum - issue of Helicobacter pylori infection - concurrent evidence

Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 – ss 9, 120, 120A

Statement of Principles Instrument No. 80 of 1999 concerning Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

REASONS FOR DECISION

23 January 2003   Dr J D Campbell, Member

1.      In this matter, Mrs Hilda Thomas ("the Applicant") seeks a review of the decision of the Repatriation Commission ("the Respondent") dated 15 March 2000 that determined, that the death of her husband, the late veteran Mr James Thomas was not war caused, in that the evidence did not raise a reasonable hypothesis connecting the death of the late veteran with his operational service. This decision was reviewed by the Veterans' Review Board  ("VRB") and affirmed in a decision dated 22 February 2001.

2.      A hearing was held before the Tribunal in Sydney on 28 August 2002 at which the Applicant was represented by Mr Vincent of Counsel. The Respondent was represented by Mr Modder, an advocate, from the Department of Veterans' Affairs. The Applicant and Professor Zwi presented oral evidence on this day. The matter was held over until 13 November 2002 at which concurrent evidence was taken from Dr Garvey and Professor Zwi, together with closing submissions.

3.      The following documents were placed into evidence before the Tribunal:

Exhibit

Description

Date

T1-T19
p1-p59

Documents prepared pursuant to section 37 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975

A1

Applicant's Statement of Facts & Contentions

20 November 2001

A2

Statement of Mrs Hilda Thomas

28 February 2002

A3

Statement of Mr John Little

20 February 2002

A4

Medical Report of Professor J Shepherd

8 November 2001

A5

Medical Report of Dr J Garvey

9 July 2002

A6

Medical Report of Dr J Garvey

11 November 2002

A7

Five Articles provided by Dr J Garvey

13 November 2002

R1

Respondent's Statement of Facts & Contentions

14 August 2002

R2

Clinical Notes of Dr Wong

R3

Clinical Notes Bankstown Lidcombe Hospital

R4

Medical Report of Dr Hall

12 November 2001

R5

Medical Report of Dr Hall

3 January 2002

R6

Medical Report of Professor Zwi

23 June 2002

R7

Clinical Notes Concord Hospital

issue

4.      The relevant issue in this matter is whether the late veteran's death from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma was war-caused.

legislation

5.      The relevant legislation in this matter is the Veterans' Entitlements Act1986 ("the Act") and in particular sections 9, 120, 120A and Statement of Principles Instrument No.80 of 1999 concerning non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

background

6.      The Applicant lodged a claim (T11) for a widow's pension on 13 March 2000 in which she…

Continue reading Thomas and Repatriation Commission

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Thomas and Repatriation Commission [2003] AATA 65
Case
[2003] AATA 65
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Thomas, the appellant, challenged a decision by the Executor Trustee of the Repatriation Commission, the respondent, concerning the eligibility of a war widow pension under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986. The central issue was whether Thomas's wife's death from B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the duodenum was caused by the war, with a particular focus on the role of Helicobacter pylori infection as a contributing factor. This dispute was heard by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.

The primary legal issues before the Tribunal were the interpretation of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, specifically sections 9, 120, and 120A, and the relevance of Statement of Principles Instrument No. 80 of 1999 concerning Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. The Tribunal had to determine whether the wife's death was war-caused and whether the evidence supported a link between her illness and the veteran's service, particularly concerning the presence and impact of Helicobacter pylori infection. The Tribunal considered expert medical evidence and concurrent evidence on the matter.

The Tribunal concluded that the evidence did not establish a causal link between the wife's death and any war service-related factors, including Helicobacter pylori infection. The Tribunal found that the respondent's decision was well-reasoned and supported by the evidence available. It determined that the wife's death did not meet the criteria for a war-caused death under the Act. Accordingly, the Tribunal affirmed the decision of the Executor Trustee of the Repatriation Commission, dismissing the appeal.

The Tribunal's decision affirmed the respondent's decision and maintained the original determination that Thomas was not entitled to the war widow pension. The Tribunal did not find any basis to alter the outcome of the case based on the evidence presented.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Tribunal determines that the decision under review be affirmed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.