Therese Jenner v Kanga Birtles

Link copied
Case Copied 6 min read

NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Therese Jenner v Kanga Birtles [2014] NSWCATCD 63
Hearing dates:22 April 2014
Decision date: 06 May 2014
Before: J Levingston, General Member
Decision:

Transfer of proceedings

These proceedings are to be transferred to the NSW Local Court at Nowra (in accordance with the rules of that court) as a Court that has jurisdiction in the matter, and to continue before that court as if the proceedings had been instituted there.

Catchwords: Admiralty - Tribunal has no jurisdiction - transfer to Local Court of NSW
Legislation Cited: Admiralty Act 1988 (Cth)
Australian Consumer Law (NSW)
Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act (NSW) 2013
Constitution s 77(iii)
Consumer Claims Act 1998 (NSW) ("CCA")
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
Cases Cited: China Shipping (Australia) Agency Co Pty Limited v D V Kelly Pty Limited [2010] NSWSC 1556
Da Silva and Da Silva Constructions Pty Ltd v Bresond Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 158
Trust Company of Australia Limited (t/as Stockland Property Management) v Skiwing Pty Ltd (t/as Café Tiffany's) [2006] NSWCA 185
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Therese Jenner (applicant)
Kanga Birtles (respondent)
File Number(s):GEN 14/18884

reasons for decision

APPLICATION

  1. This is a claim concerning repairs to the applicant's yacht. The claim is brought under the Consumer Claims Act 1998 (NSW) ("CCA") and the Australian Consumer law (NSW) ("ACL"). However, it is also a claim to which the Admiralty Act 1988 (Cth) applies.

  1. The short facts of this matter are that the applicant is the owner of a yacht, the respondent carried out repairs to the applicant's yacht and a dispute arose about those repairs, after which the respondent declined to do more work and left the yacht tied up to a public wharf for the applicant to collect. The dispute is said to involve less than $10,000.00.

Appearances

  1. Both parties appeared and after some negotiations between them their dispute remained unresolved.

Jurisdiction

  1. The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal ("NCAT") is the successor to all the previous Tribunals in NSW including the Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal ("CTTT"), and this matter has been assigned to the Consumer and Commercial Division of NCAT.

  1. The problem for the applicant is that the claim comes within the Admiralty jurisdiction of the Commonwealth and NCAT has no jurisdiction to determine an Admiralty claim.

Admiralty claims

  1. "Maritime Claims" are within the Admiralty jurisdiction of the Commonwealth and the Admiralty Act applies to all maritime claims: see Admiralty Act s5 (Application) which relevantly provides:

(1) Subject to the succeeding provisions of this section, this Act applies in relation to:
(a) all ships, irrespective of the places of residence or domicile of their owners; and
(b) all maritime claims, wherever arising.
(2) ...
(3) This Act does not apply in relation to a cause of action that arose:
(a) in respect of an inland waterways vessel; or
(b) in respect of the use or intended use of a ship on inland waters.
(4) ...
  1. A "ship"…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Therese Jenner v Kanga Birtles and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2014] NSWCATCD 63
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Therese Jenner initiated legal proceedings against Kanga Birtles in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. Jenner's claims stem from an incident occurring aboard a vessel, which she alleges resulted in personal injuries and loss. The court was tasked with determining whether it had the appropriate jurisdiction to hear and decide upon the case or if it should be transferred to another court.

The principal legal issue before the court was whether it had the necessary jurisdiction to entertain Jenner's claims. The court considered the jurisdictional limits imposed by the relevant statutes and the specific nature of the incident, which involved maritime matters. The court also had to decide if the claims fell within the scope of the Admiralty jurisdiction as defined by the applicable legislation.

In examining the jurisdictional question, the court found that the claims did not fall within the Admiralty jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. Consequently, the court concluded that the proceedings should be transferred to the Local Court of New South Wales, which has the appropriate jurisdiction to hear the matter. The court emphasised that the transfer was necessary to ensure that the proceedings could be heard by a court with the requisite authority to adjudicate on the claims presented.

Accordingly, the court ordered the transfer of the proceedings to the Local Court of New South Wales at Nowra, with instructions for the proceedings to continue as if they had been originally filed in that court. This transfer ensures that the matter will be decided by a court with the correct jurisdictional authority.

Orders

Orders of the court

Transfer of proceedings

These proceedings are to be transferred to the NSW Local Court at Nowra (in accordance with the rules of that court) as a Court that has jurisdiction in the matter, and to continue before that court as if the proceedings had been instituted there.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.