DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
PARTIES:
The Queen
v
Megumi Ogawa (accused)FILE NO:
Brisbane 3019/07
DIVISION:
Criminal
PROCEEDING:
Directions hearing
ORIGINATING COURT:
District Court, Brisbane
DELIVERED ON:
22 December 2008
DELIVERED AT:
Townsville
HEARING DATE:
10 December 2008
JUDGE:
DURWARD SC, DCJ
ORDERS:
(1) This matter is adjourned to 10 a.m. on Thursday 29 January 2009 at the District Court, Brisbane for mention appearance required, or for hearing of pre-trial applications, if any.
(2) The bail undertaking of the accused is enlarged on the present conditions, including those relating to medical or psychiatric treatment, to 10am on Thursday 29 January 2009.
(3) The hearing of further pre-trial applications by the accused, if any, including applications for directions or for the exclusion of evidence to proceed on Thursday 29 January 2009 and (if necessary) Friday 30 January 2009, subject to the following directions:
(a) That any application be in writing and disclose the grounds of the application and be filed in the Registry and served on the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions by 4 p.m. on Monday 19 January 2009;
(b) That a written Outline of Submissions by the accused be filed in the Registry and served on the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions by 4 p.m. on Monday 19 January 2009;
(c) That the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions file a written Outline of Submissions in reply and serve it on the accused, by 4 p.m. on Friday 23 January 2009; and
(d) That any Subpoena to Witness to give evidence and/or produce documents, on any pre-trial application, be filed and served by 4 p.m. on Wednesday 21 January 2009.
(4) The prosecution to make further disclosure, if any, of documents upon which it intends to rely on the trial by 4 p.m. on Monday 19 January 2009.
(5) The trial with Judge and Jury to commence at 10 a.m. on Monday 9 March 2009 at the District Court, Brisbane.
CATCHWORDS:
PROCEDURE – Pre-trial directions hearing – Capacity of accused to prepare and appear on hearings and on trial without legal representation – psychiatric diagnoses or other reasons.
DIRECTIONS – further proceedings.
COUNSEL:
Mr D.R. Kent for the Prosecution
Accused was self representedSOLICITORS: Office of the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions
Accused – no legal representation.
The accused was charged with four Commonwealth offences made pursuant to the Criminal Code. She has been arraigned and has entered pleas of not guilty. She has at all material times not been represented by lawyers. That circumstance has been well documented in other material and in evidence and has been referred to in judgments of this Court and of the Supreme Court.
The accused was born in Japan (date of birth 24 October 1967) and was awarded a Law Degree at about age 23. She commenced a Master of Laws degree at the National University of Japan in 1996 at about age 28. After completing three years of that course she accepted a doctoral…
Continue reading The Queen v Ogawa
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- The Queen v Ogawa [2008] QDC 338
- Case
- [2008] QDC 338
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included whether Ogawa had the necessary capacity to manage his own defence without legal representation and the specific directions that should be given for the pre-trial and trial processes. The court also needed to set a timeline for the filing and serving of any pre-trial applications, outlines of submissions, and subpoenas, as well as any further disclosure of documents by the prosecution.
The court ruled that the case would be adjourned for a mention appearance or for hearing any pre-trial applications on Thursday 29 January 2009. It also enlarged the bail conditions of the accused, maintaining the existing medical and psychiatric treatment terms. The court specified a timeline for the filing and serving of pre-trial applications and outlines of submissions, with deadlines set for Monday 19 January, Friday 23 January, and Wednesday 21 January. The prosecution was directed to disclose any further documents it intended to rely on by Monday 19 January. Finally, the court set the trial with a judge and jury to commence on Monday 9 March 2009.
In conclusion, the court provided clear directions for the handling of pre-trial applications, outlining the necessary procedural steps and deadlines. The trial was set to proceed as scheduled, with the accused's capacity to represent himself considered in the context of the upcoming proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) This matter is adjourned to 10 a.m. on Thursday 29 January 2009 at the District Court, Brisbane for mention appearance required, or for hearing of pre-trial applications, if any.
(2) The bail undertaking of the accused is enlarged on the present conditions, including those relating to medical or psychiatric treatment, to 10am on Thursday 29 January 2009.
(3) The hearing of further pre-trial applications by the accused, if any, including applications for directions or for the exclusion of evidence to proceed on Thursday 29 January 2009 and (if necessary) Friday 30 January 2009, subject to the following directions:
(a) That any application be in writing and disclose the grounds of the application and be filed in the Registry and served on the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions by 4 p.m. on Monday 19 January 2009;
(b) That a written Outline of Submissions by the accused be filed in the Registry and served on the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions by 4 p.m. on Monday 19 January 2009;
(c) That the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions file a written Outline of Submissions in reply and serve it on the accused, by 4 p.m. on Friday 23 January 2009; and
(d) That any Subpoena to Witness to give evidence and/or produce documents, on any pre-trial application, be filed and served by 4 p.m. on Wednesday 21 January 2009.
(4) The prosecution to make further disclosure, if any, of documents upon which it intends to rely on the trial by 4 p.m. on Monday 19 January 2009.
(5) The trial with Judge and Jury to commence at 10 a.m. on Monday 9 March 2009 at the District Court, Brisbane.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.