SUPREME COURT OF NORFOLK ISLAND
The Queen v Hooper [2019] NFSC 1
File number: SCC 2 of 2018 Judge: WIGNEY J Date of judgment: 5 December 2018 Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – where accused pleaded guilty to one count of committing the offence of being an accessory after the fact contrary to s 340 of the Criminal Code 2007 (NI) – consideration of the objective seriousness of the offence – consideration of the subjective circumstances of the offender – consideration of any relevant mitigating circumstances
CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – Norfolk Island sentencing law – consideration of the purposes for imposing a sentence on an offender pursuant to s 5(1) of the Sentencing Act 2007 (NI) – consideration to s 5(2) of the Sentencing Act 2007 (NI) – mitigating circumstances – delay – whether delay is a mitigating factor – where delay was not caused by the offender – where the offender was convicted but released on a bond without security pursuant to s 13 of the Sentencing Act 2007 (NI) – where bond is subject to conditions including good behaviour and supervision by Community Corrections
Legislation: Criminal Code 2007 (NI) ss 259, 340
Interpretation Act 1979 (NI) s 12A
Sentencing Act 2007 (NI) ss 5, 5(1), 5(2), 13
Cases cited: Scook v R (2008) 185 A Crim R 164
Date of hearing: 5 December 2018 Registry: Norfolk Island Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 52 Solicitor for the Prosecutor: Mr W S Ferguson of Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions Solicitor for the Defendant: Mr J Brown of McIntyres ORDERS
SCC 2 of 2018 BETWEEN: THE QUEEN
Prosecutor
AND: JAMES THOMAS HOOPER
Defendant
JUDGE:
WIGNEY J
DATE OF ORDER:
5 DECEMBER 2018
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The defendant be convicted of the offence of being an accessory after the fact contrary to s 340 of the Criminal Code 2007 (NI).
2.The defendant be released, without security, pursuant to a bond under s 13 of the Sentencing Act 2007 (NI), subject to the following conditions:
(a)appear before Court if called on to do so during the period of the order being 12 months;
(b)to be of good behaviour for the period of 12 months; and
(c)to be subject to supervision by New South Wales Community Corrections pursuant to the supervision plan recommended in the Sentencing Assessment Report dated 3 December 2018 or such other supervision plan as recommended by New South Wales Community Corrections, and to report to Queanbeyan Community Corrections Office to organise the commencement of that supervision.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Delivered ex tempore, revised from transcript)WIGNEY J:
On 5 December 2018, the offender, Mr James Thomas Hooper, was arraigned and pleaded guilty to one count of committing the offence of being an accessory after the fact contrary to s 340 of the Criminal Code 2007 (NI).
The offence in the indictment was framed in the…
Continue reading The Queen v Hooper
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- The Queen v Hooper [2019] NFSC 1
- Case
- [2019] NFSC 1
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the purposes of sentencing under section 5(1) of the Sentencing Act 2007 (NI), which includes denunciation, deterrence, rehabilitation, and protection of the community. Section 5(2) of the Act also required the court to consider mitigating factors, including the delay in the proceedings. However, as the delay was not attributable to the defendant, it did not significantly weigh in his favour. The court noted the defendant's release on a bond without security, a condition of which was supervision by Community Corrections. The court was satisfied with the conditions of the bond and the supervision plan recommended in the Sentencing Assessment Report dated 3 December 2018. Consequently, the court decided to release the defendant on a bond without security, subject to specific conditions.
The court ordered that the defendant be convicted of the offence of being an accessory after the fact and be released, without security, pursuant to a bond under section 13 of the Sentencing Act 2007 (NI). The bond was subject to conditions that the defendant must appear before the court if called upon, maintain good behaviour for 12 months, and be supervised by New South Wales Community Corrections. The supervision plan recommended in the Sentencing Assessment Report or an alternative plan recommended by New South Wales Community Corrections was to govern this supervision. The court's orders were finalised in accordance with Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The defendant be convicted of the offence of being an accessory after the fact contrary to s 340 of the Criminal Code 2007 (NI).
2. The defendant be released, without security, pursuant to a bond under s 13 of the Sentencing Act 2007 (NI), subject to the following conditions:
(a) appear before Court if called on to do so during the period of the order being 12 months;
(b) to be of good behaviour for the period of 12 months; and
(c) to be subject to supervision by New South Wales Community Corrections pursuant to the supervision plan recommended in the Sentencing Assessment Report dated 3 December 2018 or such other supervision plan as recommended by New South Wales Community Corrections, and to report to Queanbeyan Community Corrections Office to organise the commencement of that supervision.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.