Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Owners – Strata Plan No. 98503 v Morrell [2021] NSWCATCD 124 Hearing dates: 5 August 2021 Date of orders: 10 December 2021 Decision date: 10 December 2021 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: R Notley, Senior Member Decision: 1. Within six (6) months of the date of this order, the respondent is to:
a) remove the bi-fold windows installed by her and which enclose the terrace of her lot; and
b) make good all damage caused to the common property by the installation and removal of the bi-fold windows.
2. In the event that the respondent fails to comply with order 1, the applicant, by its agents, servants and contractors, be granted access to the respondent’s lot to remove the bi-fold windows and make good all damage caused to the common property by the installation and removal of the bi-fold windows.
Catchwords: LAND LAW — Strata title — Unapproved work — Make good all damage to common property
Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)
Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW)
Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 (NSW)
Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Stolfa v Hempton [2010] NSWCA 218
Stolfa v Owners Strata Plan No 4366 [2009] NSWSC 589
The Owners – Strata Plan No. 32735 v Heather Lesley-Swan [2012] NSWSC 383
The Owners – Strata Plan No. 21702 v Krimbogiannis [2014] NSWCA 411
Texts Cited: Nil
Category: Principal judgment Parties: The Owners – Strata Plan No 98503 (Applicant)
Angela Morrell (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Dominic Williams (Respondent)
Jane Crittenden Lawyer (Applicant)
Nexus Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): SC 20/51636 Publication restriction: None
REASONS FOR DECISION
INTRODUCTION
-
This is a strata schemes application by an owners corporation seeking relief under sections 132 and 120(4) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) (the SSMA) against a lot owner.
-
It was not in dispute, and I find, that:
Strata Plan No 98503 (the Strata Plan), also known as Hensley Hall, is an eight-storey mixed use building, with two levels of basement car parking, on the corner of Bayswater Road, Ward Avenue and Goderich Lane, Potts Point, New South Wales (the Building);
the Strata Plan was registered on 5 November 2018 and comprises forty-four (44) residential lots, one (1) commercial lot and common property;
the Building retained the façade of three Edwardian terraces facing Bayswater Road.
-
It was not in dispute, and I find, that the Building is located within a Heritage Conservation Area under the Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012.
-
The applicant is the Owners Corporation of the Strata Plan.
-
The respondent is the owner of Lot 1 in the Strata Plan (Lot 1). Lot 1 is also known as apartment 101 in the Building. It was not in dispute, and I find, that:
Lot 1 is on the ground floor of the Building and includes a twenty-one (21) square metre terrace which fronts onto Bayswater Road; and
the terrace sits behind the retained façade…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read The Owners - Strata Plan No. 98503 v Morrell and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2021] NSWCATCD 124
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary issue before the court was whether the respondent had the right to install the bi-fold windows on her terrace without first obtaining approval from the strata committee. The court needed to determine if the respondent's actions constituted a breach of the Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 and if so, what orders should be made to remedy the situation. The court also needed to consider the impact of the respondent's actions on the common property and the other lot owners.
The court found that the respondent had not obtained the necessary approval from the strata committee before installing the bi-fold windows, which was a breach of the Strata Schemes Management Act 1996. The court held that the respondent's actions had caused damage to the common property, and as such, she was required to remove the windows and make good all damage caused by their installation and removal. The court further held that if the respondent failed to comply with the order, the applicant was granted access to the respondent’s lot to remove the windows and make good all damage caused to the common property by the installation and removal of the bi-fold windows.
In summary, the court ordered the respondent to remove the bi-fold windows installed on her terrace and make good all damage caused to the common property by their installation and removal. The court also granted the applicant access to the respondent’s lot to carry out these tasks if the respondent failed to comply with the order within six months of the date of the order.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Within six (6) months of the date of this order, the respondent is to:
a) remove the bi-fold windows installed by her and which enclose the terrace of her lot; and
b) make good all damage caused to the common property by the installation and removal of the bi-fold windows.
2. In the event that the respondent fails to comply with order 1, the applicant, by its agents, servants and contractors, be granted access to the respondent’s lot to remove the bi-fold windows and make good all damage caused to the common property by the installation and removal of the bi-fold windows.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.