The Owners - Strata Plan 11245 v Qasim

Link copied
Case Copied 51 min read

District Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: The Owners – Strata Plan 11245 v Qasim [2024] NSWDC 468
Hearing dates: 8, 30 November 2023; 30 April; 1, 2 May (further written submissions); 7 and 14 June 2024 (further written submissions)
Date of orders: 21 June 2024
Decision date: 21 June 2024
Jurisdiction:Civil
Before: Andronos SC DCJ
Decision:

(1)   Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant in the sum of $62,834.38.

(2) With respect to interest under s 86 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW):

(a)   Direct the plaintiff to calculate interest in accordance with these reasons and to provide its calculations to the Court and to the defendant by 5pm on 26 June 2024.

(b)   If the sum of interest is not agreed, direct the defendant to provide to the plaintiff and to the Court any submission, limited to 2 pages and only as to the computation of interest by the plaintiff, by 5pm on 1 July 2024.

(3)   The defendant pay the plaintiff’s costs on the ordinary basis as assessed or agreed.

Catchwords:

LAND LAW — Strata title — Owners corporation — Contributions by owners – Recovery of unpaid contributions and interest – Unpaid strata levies – Notice of Levy

Legislation Cited:

Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 (NSW), s 78

Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW), s 4, s 24, s 79, s 81, s 83, s 85, s 86, s 103, s 106, Sch 1

Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 42.1, Sch 7

Cases Cited:

Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336

Coshott v The Owners of Strata Plan No. 48892 [2006] NSWSC 308

Qassim v Mitchell [2022] NSWSC 698

The Owners – Strata Plan No 2227 v Navhand Pty Ltd [2023] NSWDC 568

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: The Owners - Strata Plan No 11245 (plaintiff)
Shaheen Qasim (defendant)
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr T Bland (plaintiff)

Solicitors:
Strathfield Law (plaintiff)

Other:
Defendant (self-represented)
File Number(s): 2021/00070005
Publication restriction: Nil

JUDGMENT

  1. The plaintiff, The Owners – Strata Plan 11245, seeks an order pursuant to s 86(2A) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) (the “Act”) that the defendant, Shaheen Qasim, pay unpaid contributions due under the Act, together with interest on those contributions and reasonable recovery expenses.

  2. The plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the common property in a building comprising four units at William Street, Randwick, NSW (the “Building”) and manages the strata scheme in respect of the Building. The defendant is, and was at all material times, the owner of two units, being Lots (or units) 3 and 4 in the Building. She lives in unit 4.

  3. The plaintiff and the owners of Lots 1 and 2 in the Building have been in dispute with the defendant for many years. There have been many proceedings between them conducted in this Court, the Local Court, the Supreme Court and the New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT). It is unlikely that these proceedings will be the last.

  4. These proceedings are…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read The Owners - Strata Plan 11245 v Qasim and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2024] NSWDC 468
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of The Owners - Strata Plan 11245 v Qasim, the plaintiff, an owners corporation, sought to recover unpaid strata levies from the defendant, a strata lot owner. The dispute arose from the defendant's failure to pay levies for the period from 2014 to 2018, totalling $62,834.38, along with interest. The matter was heard in the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT).

The primary legal issues involved whether the plaintiff could recover the unpaid levies and interest from the defendant, and if so, how the interest should be calculated. The court needed to determine if the levies were properly assessed and if the defendant had received proper notice of the levies, as required by the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW). Additionally, the court had to consider the appropriate method for calculating the interest on the unpaid levies.

The NCAT found that the levies were properly assessed and that the defendant had been given adequate notice, as required by the legislation. The court also held that the defendant was liable for the unpaid levies and interest. Regarding the calculation of interest, the court directed the plaintiff to compute the interest in accordance with the reasons provided and to provide their calculations to the defendant and the court by a specified date. If the parties could not agree on the amount of interest, the defendant was given a limited opportunity to submit their own calculations.

The final orders of the tribunal included judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $62,834.38, with specific directions for the calculation and submission of interest figures. The defendant was also ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs on the ordinary basis, as assessed or agreed.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant in the sum of $62,834.38.

(2) With respect to interest under s 86 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW):

(a) Direct the plaintiff to calculate interest in accordance with these reasons and to provide its calculations to the Court and to the defendant by 5pm on 26 June 2024.

(b) If the sum of interest is not agreed, direct the defendant to provide to the plaintiff and to the Court any submission, limited to 2 pages and only as to the computation of interest by the plaintiff, by 5pm on 1 July 2024.

(3) The defendant pay the plaintiff’s costs on the ordinary basis as assessed or agreed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.