THE KING
v
BREDAL
[2024] HCASL 202
S72/2024
The applicant seeks special leave to appeal from the whole of a judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales (Harrison CJ at CL, Button and Dhanji JJ), dismissing an appeal against the sentence imposed in the District Court of New South Wales (Allan DCJ).
There is insufficient reason to doubt the correctness of the Court of Criminal Appeal's judgment to warrant a grant of special leave to appeal.
Special leave to appeal is refused.
Gageler CJ
Gordon J
Edelman J
Steward J
Gleeson J
Jagot J
Beech-Jones J8 August 2024
Continue reading The King v Bredal
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- The King v Bredal [2024] HCASL 202
- Case
- [2024] HCASL 202
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the High Court was whether there was sufficient reason to doubt the correctness of the Court of Criminal Appeal's judgment to warrant granting Bredal special leave to appeal. The Court had to consider whether the appeal raised a significant question of law of general public importance or whether there was a substantial miscarriage of justice that warranted further review. The Court also had to assess the likelihood of success of the appeal and the potential impact on the administration of justice if special leave were granted.
The High Court, in its judgment, found that there was insufficient reason to doubt the correctness of the Court of Criminal Appeal's judgment. The Court determined that the appeal did not raise a significant question of law of general public importance and that there was no substantial miscarriage of justice that would warrant further review. The Court concluded that the appeal was unlikely to succeed and that granting special leave would not be in the interests of the administration of justice. Consequently, the High Court refused special leave to appeal.
The final orders of the High Court were that special leave to appeal was refused, thereby upholding the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal. The applicant, Bredal, was not granted permission to further appeal the sentence imposed by the District Court of New South Wales.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.