The Checkout Pty Ltd v Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd (No 9)

Case [2021] NSWSC 714


Supreme Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: The Checkout Pty Ltd v Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd (No 9) [2021] NSWSC 714
Hearing dates: 8 June 2021 and submissions received 16 June 2021
Decision date: 17 June 2021
Jurisdiction:Equity - Commercial List
Before: Stevenson J
Decision:

Defendants to respond to Notice to Produce as set out in attached Schedule

Catchwords:

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – disclosure – notice to produce

Cases Cited:

The Checkout Pty Ltd v Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd (No 2) (Supreme Court (NSW), Stevenson J, 17 September 2020, unrep)

The Checkout Pty Ltd v Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 1364

The Checkout Pty Ltd v Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd (No 4) (Supreme Court (NSW), Stevenson J, 14 October 2020, unrep)

The Checkout Pty Ltd v Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd (No 5) [2020] NSWSC 1516

The Checkout Pty Ltd v Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd (No 6) [2020] NSWSC 1820

The Checkout Pty Ltd v Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd (No 7) [2020] NSWSC 1883

The Checkout Pty Ltd v Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd (No 8) [2021] NSWSC 703

The Checkout Pty Ltd v Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 1238

Category:Procedural rulings
Parties: The Checkout Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff)
Giant Dwarf Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff)
Julian Francis Xavier Morrow (Third Plaintiff)
Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd (First Defendant)
Nicholas Harvey Murray (Second Defendant)
Representation:

Counsel:
C O’Neill (Plaintiffs)
B F Katekar SC (Defendants)

Solicitors:
Kay & Hughes (Plaintiffs)
Bird & Bird (Defendants)
File Number(s): SC 2019/343896

Judgment

  1. The background to these proceedings is set out in the judgment of Henry J in The Checkout Pty Ltd v Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd [1] and in the judgments that I have published in relation to these proceedings since then[2] .

    1. [2020] NSWSC 1238.

    2. The Checkout Pty Ltd v Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd (No 2) (Supreme Court (NSW), Stevenson J, 17 September 2020, unrep); The Checkout Pty Ltd v Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 1364; The Checkout Pty Ltd v Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd (No 4) (Supreme Court (NSW), Stevenson J, 14 October 2020, unrep); The Checkout Pty Ltd v Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd (No 5) [2020] NSWSC 1516; The Checkout Pty Ltd v Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd (No 6) [2020] NSWSC 1820; The Checkout Pty Ltd v Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd (No 7) [2020] NSWSC 1883; The Checkout Pty Ltd v Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd (No 8) [2021] NSWSC 703.

  2. The dispute is between Mr Julian Morrow and Mr Nicholas Murray, and their associated companies (Giant Dwarf Pty Ltd in the case of Mr Morrow, and Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd in the case of Mr Murray). The dispute concerns the circumstances of which Mr Morrow and his associated company ceased to be involved in the production of the television series “The Checkout” for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (“ABC”).

  3. For simplicity, I will refer simply to Mr Morrow and Mr Murray.

  4. On 16 April 2021 Mr Morrow served on Mr Murray a Notice to Produce calling for 43 categories of documents.

  5. On 14 May 2021 Mr Murray filed a Notice of Motion seeking to set aside the Notice to Produce.

  6. I directed the parties to prepare a schedule, in the nature of Scott Schedule, setting out their competing contentions in regard to the documents sought in that Notice to Produce and stated that I would resolve the dispute by completing that schedule setting out my decision in relation to each category of documents.

  7. I attach to these reasons the Schedule  which I have completed by stating whether I allow or disallow the various paragraphs of the Notice to Produce. (Schedule re Notice to Produce (410427, pdf))

  8. Mr Murray has been substantially successful in relation to that exercise.

  9. Accordingly, Mr Murray should have his costs of his Notice of Motion of 14 May 2021.

  10. I make the following orders:

  1. Order that the defendants respond to the plaintiffs’ Notice to Produce of 16 April 2021 in accordance with the decisions recorded in the Schedule attached to these reasons.

  2. Order that the plaintiffs pay the defendants’ costs of the defendants’ Notice of Motion filed 14 May 2021.

**********

Endnotes

Amendments

18 June 2021 - Name corrected in [9].

Details
AGLC
The Checkout Pty Ltd v Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd (No 9) [2021] NSWSC 714
Case
[2021] NSWSC 714
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Checkout Pty Ltd, a Sydney-based retail chain, filed a lawsuit against Cordell Jigsaw Productions Pty Ltd, a film production company. The dispute centred on a contractual agreement between the parties for the production of a documentary film, with allegations of breach of contract and misrepresentation. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

The central legal issue before the court was whether The Checkout was entitled to an order for further and better disclosure from Cordell Jigsaw Productions, specifically demanding that Cordell produce documents relating to the production of the documentary. The Checkout argued that Cordell had failed to adequately respond to their initial notice to produce, thereby necessitating a further order for disclosure.

The court considered the obligations of parties under the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) regarding disclosure and the appropriate remedy when a party fails to comply with a notice to produce. The court held that the relief sought by The Checkout was appropriate given Cordell's failure to produce the requested documents. The court found that Cordell's response to the notice to produce was insufficient, and accordingly, granted The Checkout's application for further disclosure. The court emphasised the importance of parties complying with their disclosure obligations, noting that failure to do so can lead to adverse consequences.

In summary, the court ruled in favour of The Checkout, ordering Cordell Jigsaw Productions to provide the documents previously requested. The court highlighted the significance of adherence to disclosure requirements and the potential repercussions of non-compliance.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.