Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Telfer v Telfer (No 3) [2014] NSWCA 251 Hearing dates: 14, 15 May 2014, 8 July 2014 Decision date: 31 July 2014 Before: Macfarlan JA; Gleeson JA; Sackville AJA Decision: 1. Grant the applicant leave to appeal limited to the costs orders made by the primary Judge on 14 June 2013.
2. Allow the appeal.
3. Direct the applicant to file an amended notice of appeal naming Kenneth John Fairfax, in his capacity as administrator of the estate of the late Lyall Telfer, as the second respondent in place of the NSW Trustee and Guardian.
4. Without prejudice to costs orders made in the proceedings prior to 13 August 2012, set aside Orders 5 and 6 made by the primary Judge on 14 June 2013.
5. In lieu of Orders 5 and 6 made by the primary Judge on 14 June 2013 and without prejudice to costs orders made in the proceedings prior to 13 August 2012, order each party pay his or her costs of the proceedings.
6. The first respondent pay 75 per cent of the appellant's costs of the appeal (including the application for leave to appeal, but excluding the costs of the applicant's motion to adduce further evidence).
7. The first respondent, if otherwise qualified, have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 (NSW).
[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - final orders following joinder of the administrator of the estate Cases Cited: Telfer v Telfer [2014] NSWCA 186
Telfer v Telfer (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 250Category: Consequential orders Parties: Neil Ronald Telfer (Applicant / Appellant)
Carolyn Telfer (First Respondent)
Kenneth John Fairfax, in his capacity as administrator of the estate of the late Lyall Telfer (Second Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
M K Rollinson (Applicant / Appellant)
D H Murr SC (First Respondent)
In person (Second Respondent)
Solicitors:
Barrak Lawyers (Applicant / Appellant)
Whitehead Cooper Williams (First Respondent)
Fairfax Lawyers (Second Respondent)
File Number(s): 2013/205049 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal
- Jurisdiction:
- 9111
- Citation:
- Neil Ronald Telfer as Executor for the Estate of the late Lyall Telfer v Carolyn Telfer [2013] NSWSC 412 (24 April 2013)
Neil Ronald Telfer as Executor for the Estate of the late Lyall Telfer v Carolyn Telfer (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 823 (21 June 2013)- Date of Decision:
- 2013-06-14 00:00:00
- Before:
- Slattery J
- File Number(s):
- 2011/283114
Judgment
THE COURT: In the Principal Judgment delivered on 13 June 2014, the Court indicated the orders it proposed to make, subject to the applicant taking steps to join the administrator of the estate as a party to the proceedings: Telfer v Telfer [2014] NSWCA 186 at [111]-[112].
Orders have been made in a judgment of Sackville AJA delivered today for the joinder of the administrator: Telfer v Telfer (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 250.
In order to dispose of the appeal, the Court makes the following orders:
Grant the applicant leave to appeal limited to the costs orders made by the primary Judge on 14 June 2013.
Allow the appeal.
Direct the applicant to file an amended notice of appeal naming Kenneth John Fairfax, in his capacity as administrator of the estate of the late Lyall Telfer, as the second respondent in place of the NSW Trustee and Guardian.
Without prejudice to costs orders made in the proceedings prior to 13 August 2012, set aside Orders 5 and 6 made by the primary Judge on 14 June 2013.
In lieu of Orders 5 and 6 made by the primary Judge on 14 June 2013 and without prejudice to costs orders made in the proceedings prior to 13 August 2012, order each party pay his or her costs of the proceedings.
The first respondent pay 75 per cent of the appellant's costs of the appeal (including the application for leave to appeal, but excluding the costs of the applicant's motion to adduce further evidence).
The first respondent, if otherwise qualified, have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 (NSW).
**********
- AGLC
- Telfer v Telfer (No 3) [2014] NSWCA 251
- Case
- [2014] NSWCA 251
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the primary judge erred in making the costs orders and whether the joinder of the administrator necessitated a different approach to the costs of the proceedings.
The Court of Appeal granted the applicant leave to appeal, limited to the costs orders. It allowed the appeal, directing that the administrator of the estate be formally named as the second respondent. The Court set aside two specific costs orders made by the primary judge and, in lieu, ordered that each party bear their own costs of the proceedings, with the exception of costs orders made prior to a specific date.
The Court further ordered that the first respondent pay 75 per cent of the appellant's costs of the appeal, excluding the costs of a motion to adduce further evidence. The first respondent was also granted a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 (NSW), if qualified.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Grant the applicant leave to appeal limited to the costs orders made by the primary Judge on 14 June 2013.
2. Allow the appeal.
3. Direct the applicant to file an amended notice of appeal naming Kenneth John Fairfax, in his capacity as administrator of the estate of the late Lyall Telfer, as the second respondent in place of the NSW Trustee and Guardian.
4. Without prejudice to costs orders made in the proceedings prior to 13 August 2012, set aside Orders 5 and 6 made by the primary Judge on 14 June 2013.
5. In lieu of Orders 5 and 6 made by the primary Judge on 14 June 2013 and without prejudice to costs orders made in the proceedings prior to 13 August 2012, order each party pay his or her costs of the proceedings.
6. The first respondent pay 75 per cent of the appellant's costs of the appeal (including the application for leave to appeal, but excluding the costs of the applicant's motion to adduce further evidence).
7. The first respondent, if otherwise qualified, have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 (NSW).
[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.