Telfer v Telfer (No 2)

Case [2014] NSWCA 250


Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Telfer v Telfer (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 250
Hearing dates:8 July 2014
Decision date: 31 July 2014
Before: Sackville AJA
Decision:

1. The applicant be granted leave to amend the summons for leave to appeal to substitute Kenneth John Fairfax, in his capacity as administrator of the Estate of the late Lyall Telfer, as second respondent in place of the NSW Trustee and Guardian.

2. Direct the applicant to file and serve on each of the respondents an amended summons for leave to appeal.

3. Otherwise dismiss the applicant's notice of motion filed on 4 July 2014.

4. No order as to the costs of the motion.

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]

Catchwords:

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - joinder of the administrator of the estate to an appeal against costs orders

COSTS - no basis for indemnifying the appellant from the assets of the estate - appeal against costs order to be allowed without prejudice to costs orders made in interlocutory proceedings below
Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 46(2)(b)
Cases Cited: Neil Ronald Telfer as Executor for the Estate of the late Lyall Telfer v Carolyn Telfer (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 823
Telfer v Telfer [2013] NSWCA 330
Telfer v Telfer [2014] NSWCA 186
Category:Procedural and other rulings
Parties: Neil Ronald Telfer (Applicant / Appellant)
Carolyn Telfer (First Respondent)
Kenneth John Fairfax, in his capacity as administrator of the estate of the late Lyall Telfer (Second Respondent)
Representation: Counsel:
M K Rollinson (Applicant / Appellant)
D Williams (First Respondent)
In person (Second Respondent)
Solicitors:
Barrak Lawyers (Applicant / Appellant)
Whitehead Cooper Williams (First Respondent)
Fairfax Lawyers (Second Respondent)
File Number(s):2013/205049
Publication restriction:None
 Decision under appeal 
Jurisdiction:
9111
Citation:
Neil Ronald Telfer as Executor for the Estate of the late Lyall Telfer v Carolyn Telfer (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 823
Date of Decision:
2013-06-14 00:00:00
Before:
Slattery J
File Number(s):
2011/283114

Judgment

  1. SACKVILLE AJA: On 13 June 2014, the Court delivered judgment in this appeal. The judgment recorded the orders the Court proposed to make in the proceedings (Proposed Orders), subject to steps being taken to join the administrator of the estate of the late Lyall Telfer: Telfer v Telfer [2014] NSWCA 186 (Principal Judgment) at [111]-[116]. The Court made the following orders:

"1 Direct the applicant (Neil Telfer) to file and serve a motion seeking leave to join the administrator of the estate of Lyall Telfer (deceased) (Administrator) as a respondent to the appeal.
2 Direct the applicant to file and serve the motion and any…

Continue reading Telfer v Telfer (No 2)

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Telfer v Telfer (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 250
Case
[2014] NSWCA 250
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Telfer v Telfer (No 2)*, the applicant sought to amend a summons for leave to appeal to substitute the administrator of the estate of the late Lyall Telfer as the second respondent, replacing the NSW Trustee and Guardian. The dispute concerned an appeal against costs orders made in interlocutory proceedings. The court was required to determine whether the administrator should be joined as a party to the appeal and whether the appellant should be indemnified from the assets of the estate for the costs awarded against them.

The court considered the joinder of the administrator to the appeal, noting that the estate was directly affected by the costs orders. The primary legal issue was whether there was a basis for indemnifying the appellant from the assets of the estate in respect of the costs orders made in the proceedings below. The court reasoned that the appeal against the costs orders should be allowed, but this allowance was to be without prejudice to any costs orders made in the interlocutory proceedings themselves.

The court ordered that the applicant be granted leave to amend the summons for leave to appeal to substitute Kenneth John Fairfax, in his capacity as administrator of the Estate of the late Lyall Telfer, as the second respondent. The applicant was also directed to file and serve an amended summons for leave to appeal on each of the respondents. The applicant's notice of motion filed on 4 July 2014 was otherwise dismissed, and no order was made as to the costs of that motion.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The applicant be granted leave to amend the summons for leave to appeal to substitute Kenneth John Fairfax, in his capacity as administrator of the Estate of the late Lyall Telfer, as second respondent in place of the NSW Trustee and Guardian.

2. Direct the applicant to file and serve on each of the respondents an amended summons for leave to appeal.

3. Otherwise dismiss the applicant's notice of motion filed on 4 July 2014.

4. No order as to the costs of the motion.

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.