Tax Practitioners Board v Hogan

Case [2012] FCA 642


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Tax Practitioners Board v Hogan [2012] FCA 642

Citation: Tax Practitioners Board v Hogan [2012] FCA 642
Parties: TAX PRACTITIONERS BOARD v AVRIL HOGAN
File number: QUD 136 of 2012
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 10 May 2012
Catchwords: TAXATION – Tax Practitioners Board constituted pursuant to the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth) – application for imposition for pecuniary penalties and related declaratory and injunctive relief arising out of alleged contraventions related to provision of tax agent service where respondent not a registered tax agent – respondent admits to alleged contraventions – agreement between parties on appropriate penalty a relevant consideration – agreed penalty imposed because it is not inappropriate, having regard to respondent’s conduct and serves the interests of general and specific deterrence – declaratory and injunctive relief granted
Legislation: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 4AA
Income Tax Assessment Act 1915 (Cth)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1922 (Cth)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 251L
Income Tax Assessment Act 1943 (Cth)
Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth) ss 50-5, 50-45
Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Sch 1
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v MSY Technology Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 56 applied
Australian Communications Management Authority v Mobilegate Limited A Company Incorporated in Hong Kong (No 4) (2009) 180 FCR 467 considered
New South Wales Bar Association v Cummins (2001) 52 NSWLR 279 considered
NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (1996) 71 FCR 285 applied
Tobacco Institute of Australia Limited v Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc No 2 (1993) 41 FCR 89 referred to
Trade Practices Commission v CSR Limited (1991) ATPR 41-075 considered
Date of hearing: 10 May 2012
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 30
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr P Looney
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitor
Solicitor for the Respondent: Jacobson Mahony Lawyers

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

QUD 136 of 2012

BETWEEN:

TAX PRACTITIONERS BOARD
Applicant

AND:

AVRIL HOGAN
Respondent

JUDGE:

LOGAN J

DATE OF ORDER:

10 MAY 2012

WHERE MADE:

BRISBANE

THE COURT DECLARES THAT:

1.On 26 separate occasions detailed in Schedule A to this order, between about July 2010 and about October 2010 and in relation to the persons respectively described in Schedule A to this order in respect of a particular occasion, the respondent by providing to that person a service:

1.1that involved the respondent doing one or more of the following:

1.1.1giving advice to the person in relation to the person's income tax return;

1.1.2completing details of the person's income tax return in preparation for lodgement;

1.1.3lodging the person's income tax return with the Commissioner of Taxation;

1.2for which the respondent received a monetary payment for providing the said service;

1.3with knowledge of the matters referred to in sub-paragraphs 1.1 and 1.2 above;

1.4while the respondent was not a registered tax agent pursuant to the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act);

1.5which…

Continue reading Tax Practitioners Board v Hogan

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Tax Practitioners Board v Hogan [2012] FCA 642
Case
[2012] FCA 642
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, the Tax Practitioners Board brought an application against Ms Avril Hogan in relation to alleged contraventions of the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth). The Board sought to impose pecuniary penalties, as well as declaratory and injunctive relief, against Ms Hogan for providing tax agent services without being registered as required by the Act. Ms Hogan admitted to the contraventions and the parties agreed on an appropriate penalty. The central legal issues for the court were whether the agreed penalty was appropriate and whether it served the interests of general and specific deterrence. The court held that the penalty was appropriate and that it served the interests of deterrence, and thus imposed the penalty as agreed by the parties. The court also granted the declaratory and injunctive relief sought by the Board, requiring Ms Hogan to provide specified information to clients before offering tax agent services and to retain and submit documentation to the Tax Practitioners Board. The court ordered Ms Hogan to pay the pecuniary penalty of $30,000 in installments, with costs to be paid on a party and party basis.

Orders

Orders of the court

2. In respect of the 26 separate contraventions of the Act one pecuniary penalty in the amount of $30,000 is imposed on the respondent.

3. The respondent pay the pecuniary penalty of $30,000 to the Commissioner of Taxation on behalf of the Commonwealth of Australia, such penalty to be paid as follows:

3.1 $5,000.00 on or before 30 November 2012;

3.2 $10,000.00 on or before 30 November 2013;

3.3 $10,000.00 on or before 30 November 2014;

3.4 the balance on or before 10 May 2015.

4. The respondent have liberty to apply in respect of the extension of any of the times provided for payment of the pecuniary penalty by order 3 herein.

5. For a period of 3 years from the date of this order, if she is requested to provide to another person or entity a service relating to one or more of:

5.1 advising another person or entity in relation to their entitlements, liabilities or obligations in relation to an Australian taxation law;

5.2 completing for another person or entity a return or statement in relation to an Australian taxation law; or

5.3 lodging for another person or entity a return or statement in relation to a taxation law with the Australian Taxation Office;

the respondent must, before providing or agreeing to provide the said service, and unless then registered as a tax agent pursuant to the Act, inform the person or entity of the matters referred to in paragraphs 1 to 8 in Form A in Schedule B to the Order and, if the person or entity still requests the service be performed by the respondent:

5.4 have the person or entity complete and sign Form A annexed hereto;

5.5 retain a copy of the form for a period of 3 years; and

5.6 provide any such signed forms to the Tax Practitioners Board within 14 days of its request.

6. The respondent pay the costs of the applicant on a party and party basis to be taxed if not agreed.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011

SCHEDULE A

TO ORDER OF 10 MAY 2012

Person

Date

1.

Ayers, Linda

21 July 2010

2.

Heugh, Kelly

21 July 2010

3.

Ingram, Tanya

21 July 2010

4.

Knight, Dianne

22 July 2010

5.

Haywood, Aaron

28 July 2010

6.

Forsythe, Mathew

29 July 2010

7.

Reid, Alice

31 July 2010

8.

Stemphelet, Marlene

3 August 2010

9.

Thompson, Moana

3 August 2010

10.

Thompson, Steven

3 August 2010

11.

Sproston, Helen

4 August 2010

12.

Thorley, Hayley

4 August 2010

13.

Thorley, Mark

4 August 2010

14.

Chaloner, Shannon

8 August 2010

15.

Fernandez, Zao

8 August 2010

16.

Stephenson, Esther

9 August 2010

17.

Tyler, Nicole

9 August 2010

18.

Yesilada, Marti

12 August 2010

19.

Cattuzo, Lora

22 August 2010

20.

Bullock, Lukas

25 August 2010

21.

Meyers, Debbie

25 August 2010

22.

Ryan, Kylie

25 August 2010

23.

Williams, Christopher

27 August 2010

24.

Stephens, Samantha

6 September 2010

25.

Billingsley, Benjamin

12 September 2010

26.

Kinch, Erin

25 October 2010

SCHEDULE B

to the Order of 10 May 2012

FORM A

I, [print full name] ……….………………………….………..…………………….…………, having requested Avril Hogan to provide a service (i) to me / (ii) to the entity named: ………………………………………………..….….………. [delete whichever inapplicable] relating to one or more of the following:

(a) giving advice concerning entitlements, liabilities or obligations that arise or could arise under a taxation law;

(b) completing a return or statement in relation to a taxation law; or

(c) lodging a return or statement in relation to a taxation law with the Australian Taxation Office;

and having been informed that:

1. she is not a registered tax agent;

2. she may not have the educational qualifications to be a registered tax agent and could only finally ascertain whether she is eligible in terms of those qualifications to be registered if she were to apply to the Tax Practitioners Board for registration as a tax agent;

3. she may not have the relevant experience as required by the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009 to become a registered tax agent;

4. she may not be a fit and proper person to be a registered agent so as to be able to provide a service relating to one or more of items (a), (b) or (c) above for a fee or other reward;

5. a person or entity should seek assistance from a registered tax agent for matters that relate to such services or for such services;

6. she does not wish to receive, and will not accept, any fee, benefit or reward of any kind for providing such a service;

7. she is likely to be contravening the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 if she receives a fee, benefit or reward for providing such a service; and

8. she is required by order of the Federal Court of Australia to inform me of these matters;

still request her to provide the service.

SIGNED: ……………………………… DATE: …………..………….

………………………………………………………..………………………………………..

print full address

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.