FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tax Practitioners Board v Hogan [2012] FCA 642
Citation: Tax Practitioners Board v Hogan [2012] FCA 642 Parties: TAX PRACTITIONERS BOARD v AVRIL HOGAN File number: QUD 136 of 2012 Judge: LOGAN J Date of judgment: 10 May 2012 Catchwords: TAXATION – Tax Practitioners Board constituted pursuant to the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth) – application for imposition for pecuniary penalties and related declaratory and injunctive relief arising out of alleged contraventions related to provision of tax agent service where respondent not a registered tax agent – respondent admits to alleged contraventions – agreement between parties on appropriate penalty a relevant consideration – agreed penalty imposed because it is not inappropriate, having regard to respondent’s conduct and serves the interests of general and specific deterrence – declaratory and injunctive relief granted Legislation: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 4AA
Income Tax Assessment Act 1915 (Cth)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1922 (Cth)
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 251L
Income Tax Assessment Act 1943 (Cth)
Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth) ss 50-5, 50-45
Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Sch 1Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v MSY Technology Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 56 applied
Australian Communications Management Authority v Mobilegate Limited A Company Incorporated in Hong Kong (No 4) (2009) 180 FCR 467 considered
New South Wales Bar Association v Cummins (2001) 52 NSWLR 279 considered
NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (1996) 71 FCR 285 applied
Tobacco Institute of Australia Limited v Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc No 2 (1993) 41 FCR 89 referred to
Trade Practices Commission v CSR Limited (1991) ATPR 41-075 consideredDate of hearing: 10 May 2012 Place: Brisbane Division: GENERAL DIVISION Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 30 Counsel for the Applicant: Mr P Looney Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitor Solicitor for the Respondent: Jacobson Mahony Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
QUD 136 of 2012
BETWEEN: TAX PRACTITIONERS BOARD
ApplicantAND: AVRIL HOGAN
Respondent
JUDGE:
LOGAN J
DATE OF ORDER:
10 MAY 2012
WHERE MADE:
BRISBANE
THE COURT DECLARES THAT:
1.On 26 separate occasions detailed in Schedule A to this order, between about July 2010 and about October 2010 and in relation to the persons respectively described in Schedule A to this order in respect of a particular occasion, the respondent by providing to that person a service:
1.1that involved the respondent doing one or more of the following:
1.1.1giving advice to the person in relation to the person's income tax return;
1.1.2completing details of the person's income tax return in preparation for lodgement;
1.1.3lodging the person's income tax return with the Commissioner of Taxation;
1.2for which the respondent received a monetary payment for providing the said service;
1.3with knowledge of the matters referred to in sub-paragraphs 1.1 and 1.2 above;
1.4while the respondent was not a registered tax agent pursuant to the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act);
1.5which…
Continue reading Tax Practitioners Board v Hogan
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Tax Practitioners Board v Hogan [2012] FCA 642
- Case
- [2012] FCA 642
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
2. In respect of the 26 separate contraventions of the Act one pecuniary penalty in the amount of $30,000 is imposed on the respondent.
3. The respondent pay the pecuniary penalty of $30,000 to the Commissioner of Taxation on behalf of the Commonwealth of Australia, such penalty to be paid as follows:
3.1 $5,000.00 on or before 30 November 2012;
3.2 $10,000.00 on or before 30 November 2013;
3.3 $10,000.00 on or before 30 November 2014;
3.4 the balance on or before 10 May 2015.
4. The respondent have liberty to apply in respect of the extension of any of the times provided for payment of the pecuniary penalty by order 3 herein.
5. For a period of 3 years from the date of this order, if she is requested to provide to another person or entity a service relating to one or more of:
5.1 advising another person or entity in relation to their entitlements, liabilities or obligations in relation to an Australian taxation law;
5.2 completing for another person or entity a return or statement in relation to an Australian taxation law; or
5.3 lodging for another person or entity a return or statement in relation to a taxation law with the Australian Taxation Office;
the respondent must, before providing or agreeing to provide the said service, and unless then registered as a tax agent pursuant to the Act, inform the person or entity of the matters referred to in paragraphs 1 to 8 in Form A in Schedule B to the Order and, if the person or entity still requests the service be performed by the respondent:
5.4 have the person or entity complete and sign Form A annexed hereto;
5.5 retain a copy of the form for a period of 3 years; and
5.6 provide any such signed forms to the Tax Practitioners Board within 14 days of its request.
6. The respondent pay the costs of the applicant on a party and party basis to be taxed if not agreed.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
SCHEDULE A
TO ORDER OF 10 MAY 2012
Person
Date
1.
Ayers, Linda
21 July 2010
2.
Heugh, Kelly
21 July 2010
3.
Ingram, Tanya
21 July 2010
4.
Knight, Dianne
22 July 2010
5.
Haywood, Aaron
28 July 2010
6.
Forsythe, Mathew
29 July 2010
7.
Reid, Alice
31 July 2010
8.
Stemphelet, Marlene
3 August 2010
9.
Thompson, Moana
3 August 2010
10.
Thompson, Steven
3 August 2010
11.
Sproston, Helen
4 August 2010
12.
Thorley, Hayley
4 August 2010
13.
Thorley, Mark
4 August 2010
14.
Chaloner, Shannon
8 August 2010
15.
Fernandez, Zao
8 August 2010
16.
Stephenson, Esther
9 August 2010
17.
Tyler, Nicole
9 August 2010
18.
Yesilada, Marti
12 August 2010
19.
Cattuzo, Lora
22 August 2010
20.
Bullock, Lukas
25 August 2010
21.
Meyers, Debbie
25 August 2010
22.
Ryan, Kylie
25 August 2010
23.
Williams, Christopher
27 August 2010
24.
Stephens, Samantha
6 September 2010
25.
Billingsley, Benjamin
12 September 2010
26.
Kinch, Erin
25 October 2010
SCHEDULE B
to the Order of 10 May 2012
FORM A
I, [print full name] ……….………………………….………..…………………….…………, having requested Avril Hogan to provide a service (i) to me / (ii) to the entity named: ………………………………………………..….….………. [delete whichever inapplicable] relating to one or more of the following:
(a) giving advice concerning entitlements, liabilities or obligations that arise or could arise under a taxation law;
(b) completing a return or statement in relation to a taxation law; or
(c) lodging a return or statement in relation to a taxation law with the Australian Taxation Office;
and having been informed that:
1. she is not a registered tax agent;
2. she may not have the educational qualifications to be a registered tax agent and could only finally ascertain whether she is eligible in terms of those qualifications to be registered if she were to apply to the Tax Practitioners Board for registration as a tax agent;
3. she may not have the relevant experience as required by the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009 to become a registered tax agent;
4. she may not be a fit and proper person to be a registered agent so as to be able to provide a service relating to one or more of items (a), (b) or (c) above for a fee or other reward;
5. a person or entity should seek assistance from a registered tax agent for matters that relate to such services or for such services;
6. she does not wish to receive, and will not accept, any fee, benefit or reward of any kind for providing such a service;
7. she is likely to be contravening the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 if she receives a fee, benefit or reward for providing such a service; and
8. she is required by order of the Federal Court of Australia to inform me of these matters;
still request her to provide the service.
SIGNED: ……………………………… DATE: …………..………….
………………………………………………………..………………………………………..
print full address
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.