FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tasman KB Pty Limited v Watkins [2004] FCA 1190
TASMAN KB PTY LIMITED v THOMAS DOUGLAS WATKINS
N 1313 of 2004ALLSOP J
8 SEPTEMBER 2004
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N1313 of 2004
BETWEEN:
TASMAN KB PTY LIMITED
APPLICANTAND:
THOMAS DOUGLAS WATKINS
RESPONDENTJUDGE:
ALLSOP J
DATE OF ORDER:
8 SEPTEMBER 2004
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Pursuant to section 50 of the Bankruptcy Act 1996, Schon Condon, a registered trustee, take control of the property of the respondent debtor, Thomas Douglas Watkins, until a sequestration order under section 43 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 is made or until the disposition otherwise of the creditor’s petition herein.
2.The respondent debtor, Thomas Douglas Watkins, before 10 am on 15 September 2004, take all necessary and available steps including the granting of any necessary permissions to deliver to Schon Condon at Level 1, 34 Charles Street, Parramatta, NSW, 2150, all books, documents, papers and writings in his possession or power relating to his property and affairs.
3.The respondent debtor, Thomas Douglas Watkins, be restrained, without prior approval of the court, from paying, lending or depositing any monies with, or transferring or delivering any property to, any person, company or entity.
4.The respondent debtor, Thomas Douglas Watkins, be restrained without the prior approval of the Court, from transferring, sending, or taking moneys or other property out of Australia.
5.Without limitation of orders 3 and 4:
5.1the respondent debtor, Thomas Douglas Watkins, be restrained either by himself or by his servants or agents from selling, mortgaging or otherwise dealing with or disposing of or permitting to be sold, charged, mortgaged or otherwise dealt with or disposed of, all or any of his assets within the States of New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland and including, but not limited to the following properties:
(a)the property known as 2A Constitution Court, Carlingford in the State of New South Wales being the land comprised in certificate of title folio identifier 501/227481;
(b)the land comprised in certificate of title lot 392, survey plan 126913 and known as 10 Straite Drive, Robina, Queensland,
5.2the respondent debtor, Thomas Douglas Watkins, be restrained by himself and by his servants or agents from withdrawing any monies from any accounts held with a bank or other financial institution including, but not limited to the following:
(a)accounts held with Westpac Banking Corporation;
(b)accounts held with National Australia Bank Limited;
(c)accounts held with Commonwealth Bank of Australia or ANZ Banking Group Ltd; and
(d)accounts held with Tabcorp Holdings Limited and TAB Limited,
5.3the respondent debtor, Thomas Douglas Watkins, be restrained by himself and his servants or agents from dealing with or disposing of the following:
(a)the foundation plan he holds with Westpac Financial Services Limited;
(b)monies held under any superannuation policy.
6.Orders 1, 3, 4 and 5 shall not prevent the respondent debtor, Thomas Douglas Watkins, from paying to the National Australia Bank Limited monthly mortgage repayments of no…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Tasman KB Pty Limited v Watkins and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2004] FCA 1190
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with determining whether the grounds for appointing a trustee over Watkins' property were substantiated and whether such an appointment was warranted to protect the interests of creditors. The legal issues included the interpretation of the Bankruptcy Act 1966, particularly sections 43 and 50, and assessing whether Watkins' actions posed a risk to the creditor's ability to recover debts.
In its decision, the court found that the evidence presented by Tasman KB was sufficient to justify the appointment of a trustee. Watkins' actions, including attempts to transfer and dispose of assets, created a reasonable risk of prejudicing the creditors. Consequently, the court granted the relief sought by Tasman KB, appointing Schon Condon as a trustee to oversee Watkins' property and affairs. The court also issued restraining orders to prevent Watkins from disposing of or transferring assets without the court's approval. The case was stood over for further directions to manage the ongoing proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Pursuant to section 50 of the Bankruptcy Act 1996, Schon Condon, a registered trustee, take control of the property of the respondent debtor, Thomas Douglas Watkins, until a sequestration order under section 43 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 is made or until the disposition otherwise of the creditor’s petition herein.
2. The respondent debtor, Thomas Douglas Watkins, before 10 am on 15 September 2004, take all necessary and available steps including the granting of any necessary permissions to deliver to Schon Condon at Level 1, 34 Charles Street, Parramatta, NSW, 2150, all books, documents, papers and writings in his possession or power relating to his property and affairs.
3. The respondent debtor, Thomas Douglas Watkins, be restrained, without prior approval of the court, from paying, lending or depositing any monies with, or transferring or delivering any property to, any person, company or entity.
4. The respondent debtor, Thomas Douglas Watkins, be restrained without the prior approval of the Court, from transferring, sending, or taking moneys or other property out of Australia.
5. Without limitation of orders 3 and 4:
5.1 the respondent debtor, Thomas Douglas Watkins, be restrained either by himself or by his servants or agents from selling, mortgaging or otherwise dealing with or disposing of or permitting to be sold, charged, mortgaged or otherwise dealt with or disposed of, all or any of his assets within the States of New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland and including, but not limited to the following properties:
(a) the property known as 2A Constitution Court, Carlingford in the State of New South Wales being the land comprised in certificate of title folio identifier 501/227481;
(b) the land comprised in certificate of title lot 392, survey plan 126913 and known as 10 Straite Drive, Robina, Queensland,
5.2 the respondent debtor, Thomas Douglas Watkins, be restrained by himself and by his servants or agents from withdrawing any monies from any accounts held with a bank or other financial institution including, but not limited to the following:
(a) accounts held with Westpac Banking Corporation;
(b) accounts held with National Australia Bank Limited;
(c) accounts held with Commonwealth Bank of Australia or ANZ Banking Group Ltd; and
(d) accounts held with Tabcorp Holdings Limited and TAB Limited,
5.3 the respondent debtor, Thomas Douglas Watkins, be restrained by himself and his servants or agents from dealing with or disposing of the following:
(a) the foundation plan he holds with Westpac Financial Services Limited;
(b) monies held under any superannuation policy.
6. Orders 1, 3, 4 and 5 shall not prevent the respondent debtor, Thomas Douglas Watkins, from paying to the National Australia Bank Limited monthly mortgage repayments of no more than $1,940.00 payable under the mortgage over the property known as 2A Constitution Court, Carlingford.
7. The costs of this application be reserved.
8. These orders, the notice of motion dated 7 September 2004 and copies of the affidavits of James Bernard Mattson sworn 7 and 8 September 2004 with the exhibits thereto and exhibit D on the motion be served on the respondent on or before 5pm Thursday 9 September 2004; such service is to be that which can be effected with the assistance of the authorities in charge of Parramatta Correctional Centre.
9. That if the respondent wishes to seek to vary, discharge or set aside these orders or any of them, he do so, on 2 days’ notice, before the duty judge.
10. In any application to vary, discharge or set aside the orders, the applicant is to justify the continuation of the orders substantially as if the orders had been limited to expire at midnight on the day the matter is before the Court.
11. The parties have liberty to apply on 24 hours’ notice in respect of any urgent aspect or difficulty caused by the orders.
12. The matter is stood over for directions before the duty judge at 9.30 am on Friday, 17 September 2004.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: ALLSOP J
Full text does not contain this section.