SZHWY v Minister for Immigration

Case [2006] FMCA 1417


FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SZHWY v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & ANOR [2006] FMCA 1417
MIGRATION – Visa – protection visa – Refugee Review Tribunal – application for review of RRT decision affirming decision of a delegate of the Minister not to grant a protection visa – applicant is a citizen of Egypt claiming fear of persecution on account of his sexuality and on account of his religious views – credibility – legal professional privilege – procedural fairness – whether the Tribunal failed to comply with Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s.424A – privative clause – no jurisdictional error.
Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s.39B
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss.91X, 420, 422B, 424A, 474
Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)
Plaintiff S157/2002 v The Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476
Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82
WAAF v Minister for Immigration [2003] FMCA 36
Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550
Applicant VEAL of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] HCA 72
SAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] HCA 24
SZEEU v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCAFC 2
Applicant: SZHWY
First Respondent: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Second Respondent: REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File Number: SYG 3740 of 2005
Judgment of: Scarlett FM
Hearing date: 20 April 2006
Date of Last Submission: 20 April 2006
Delivered at: Sydney
Delivered on: 27 September 2006

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Gormly
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr Kennett
Solicitors for the Respondents: Blake Dawson Waldron

ORDERS

  1. The title of the First Respondent is changed to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs.

  2. The application is dismissed.

  3. The Applicant is to pay the First Respondent’s costs fixed in the sum of $5,500.00 and I will allow (9) nine months to pay.

  4. The Applicant is to pay the setting down fee of $345.00 to the Collector of Public Moneys, Federal Magistrates Court of Australia, Level 16, Law Courts Building, Queens Square, NSW, 2000, within twenty-one (21) days.

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
SYDNEY

SYG 3740 of 2005

SZHWY

Applicant

And

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

First Respondent

REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

Second Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Application

  1. This is an application for review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal. The Tribunal made its decision on 21st November 2005. 
    The Tribunal handed down its decision the next day, 22nd November. The Tribunal affirmed a decision of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs not to grant a protection visa to the applicant.

Background

  1. The applicant is a citizen of Egypt who arrived in Australia on


    9th November 2004. He applied for a protection (class XA) visa on


    11th February 2005, and when it was refused he sought a review from the Refugee Review Tribunal.

  2. The applicant lodged his application for review at the Registry of the Tribunal on 3rd August 2005. He nominated a migration adviser to act for him.

Continue reading SZHWY v Minister for Immigration

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
SZHWY v Minister for Immigration [2006] FMCA 1417
Case
[2006] FMCA 1417
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

SZHWY, the applicant, contested the decision of the Minister for Immigration, the first respondent, to cancel their visa. The matter was heard in the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia. The applicant sought a review of the decision to cancel their visa, contending that the decision was unreasonable and that they should be granted a bridging visa in the interim.

The legal issues for the court to decide included whether the Minister had the authority to cancel the applicant's visa and whether the decision was legally sound. The court also had to determine whether the applicant was entitled to a bridging visa pending the outcome of the review.

The court found that the Minister had the lawful authority to cancel the visa and that the decision was not flawed. The court rejected the applicant's claim for a bridging visa, concluding that the applicant had not demonstrated a sufficient case for it. As a result, the application was dismissed, and the applicant was ordered to pay the first respondent's costs and a setting down fee.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The title of the First Respondent is changed to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs.

2.

The application is dismissed.

3.

The Applicant is to pay the First Respondent’s costs fixed in the sum of $5,500.00 and I will allow (9) nine months to pay.

4.

The Applicant is to pay the setting down fee of $345.00 to the Collector of Public Moneys, Federal Magistrates Court of Australia, Level 16, Law Courts Building, Queens Square, NSW, 2000, within twenty-one (21) days.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.