Swart v Carr (No.2)

Case [2008] FMCA 1204


FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SWART v CARR (No.2) [2008] FMCA 1204
BANKRUPTCY – Sequestration order – judgment debt based on contested Supreme Court proceedings – bankruptcy notice not invalid for referring to debtor’s business name – no grounds for going behind judgment – debtor’s current litigation against third persons not sufficient to establish ability to pay debts – no other sufficient cause to dismiss petition – public interests in not adjourning petition – sequestration order made.
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss.52(1), 52(2), 52(2)(a), 52(3), 52(5), 306
Adams v Lambert (2006) 228 CLR 409
Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Pty Ltd v Foyster [2000] FCA 400
Cain v Whyte (1933) 48 CLR 639
Carr t/as Forshaws Neill v Swart [2008] HCASL 355
Carr t/as Forshaws Neill v Swart; Lawcover Pty Ltd v Swart [2007] NSWCA 337
Fitzgerald v FJ Leonhardt Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 215
Ling v Enrobook Pty Ltd (1997) 74 FCR 19
Matheson v Scottish Pacific Business Finance Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 670
Sandell v Porter (1966) 115 CLR 666
Stankiewicz v Plata [2000] FCA 1185
Swart v Carr [2008] FMCA 795
Swart v Carr; Swart v LawCover Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1302
Totev v Sfar [2006] FCA 470
Wolff v Donovan (1991) 29 FCR 480
Wren v Mahony (1972) 126 CLR 212
Applicant: DANIEL FREDERICK VICTOR SWART
Respondent:

MALCOLM DOUGLAS CARR

T/AS FORSHAWS NEILL SOLICITORS

File Number: SYG 250 of 2008
Judgment of: Smith FM
Hearing date: 20 August 2008
Delivered at: Sydney
Delivered on: 20 August 2008

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Applicant in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Respondent in person
Counsel for the Supporting Creditor: Mr B Skinner
Solicitors for the Supporting Creditor: Heckenberg Associates

ORDERS

  1. A sequestration order be made against the estate of MALCOLM DOUGLAS CARR.

  2. All proceedings under the sequestration order are stayed under s.52(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) for 21 days, on the following conditions:

    (i)that Mr Carr shall deliver all his current passports to his trustee before 4 pm on 21 August 2008, and shall not leave Australia without the permission of his trustee.

    (ii)that Mr Carr shall not enter into or incur any new liability exceeding the amount of $5,000, or such other amount as is agreed upon by his trustee.

  3. The applicant creditor’s costs, including all reserved costs, be taxed and paid from the estate of the respondent debtor in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).

  4. Note that the date of the act of bankruptcy is 21 January 2008.

  5. Note that a consent to act as trustee has been signed by Gavin Frederick Thomas and has been lodged with the Official Receiver in Sydney.

  6. The applicant must within 2 days give a copy of this order to the Official Receiver in Sydney.

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
SYDNEY

SYG 250 of 2008

DANIEL FREDERICK VICTOR SWART

Applicant

And

MALCOLM DOUGLAS CARR

T/AS FORSHAWS NEILL SOLICITORS

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

(revised from transcript)

  1. This bankruptcy petition comes at the end of lengthy…

Continue reading Swart v Carr (No.2)

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Swart v Carr (No.2) [2008] FMCA 1204
Case
[2008] FMCA 1204
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties involved in the case of Swart v Carr (No.2) were the applicant, Swart, and the respondent, Carr. The dispute arose from an application for a sequestration order against Carr's estate. The court hearing this case was the Federal Court of Australia. The applicant sought the sequestration of Carr's estate, which was opposed by the respondent. The key legal issues before the court were whether the respondent had committed an act of bankruptcy and if the application should be granted on the terms proposed.

The court examined the nature of the act of bankruptcy, which in this instance was identified as Carr's failure to comply with a court order. The court determined that Carr had indeed committed an act of bankruptcy, justifying the application for sequestration. Additionally, the court considered the terms proposed by the applicant, which included specific conditions to be met by Carr, such as surrendering his passports and refraining from incurring new liabilities without permission from his trustee. The court also addressed the procedural aspect of the stay of proceedings under section 52(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).

The court ruled in favour of the applicant, granting the sequestration order against Carr's estate. The court imposed the conditions outlined in the application, including the surrender of Carr's passports and restrictions on incurring new liabilities. The stay of proceedings was granted for 21 days on the specified conditions. The court also ordered that the applicant's costs, including reserved costs, be paid from Carr's estate in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). The court further noted the date of the act of bankruptcy and confirmed that a consent to act as trustee had been signed and lodged with the Official Receiver in Sydney. Finally, the applicant was directed to provide a copy of the order to the Official Receiver within two days.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

A sequestration order be made against the estate of MALCOLM DOUGLAS CARR.

2.

All proceedings under the sequestration order are stayed under s.52(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) for 21 days, on the following conditions:

(i) that Mr Carr shall deliver all his current passports to his trustee before 4 pm on 21 August 2008, and shall not leave Australia without the permission of his trustee.

(ii) that Mr Carr shall not enter into or incur any new liability exceeding the amount of $5,000, or such other amount as is agreed upon by his trustee.

3.

The applicant creditor’s costs, including all reserved costs, be taxed and paid from the estate of the respondent debtor in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).

4.

Note that the date of the act of bankruptcy is 21 January 2008.

5.

Note that a consent to act as trustee has been signed by Gavin Frederick Thomas and has been lodged with the Official Receiver in Sydney.

6.

The applicant must within 2 days give a copy of this order to the Official Receiver in Sydney.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.