SW v Forests NSW

Case [2006] NSWADT 74



CITATION: SW v Forests NSW [2006] NSWADT 74
This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the decision for a list of the amendments.
DIVISION: General Division
PARTIES: APPLICANT
SW
RESPONDENT
Forests NSW
FILE NUMBER: 053322
HEARING DATES: 28/02/2006
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 02/28/2006
 
DATE OF DECISION: 

03/13/2006
BEFORE: Handley R - Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Privacy - information protection principle - collection - unnecessary - Privacy - information protection principle - disclosure to third party
MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter
LEGISLATION CITED: Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997
Privacy & Personal Information Protection Act 1998
CASES CITED: Macquarie University v FM [2005] NSWCA 192
NS v Commissioner, Department of Corrective Services [2004] NSWADT 263
NX v Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions [2005] NSWADT 74
REPRESENTATION:

APPLICANT
In person

RESPONDENT
G Mitchell, agent
ORDERS: (1) I find that Forests NSW contravened sections 8, 10, 11, 16 and 18 of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998; (2) Forests NSW will provide SW with an unreserved public apology in respect of these contraventions and provide SW with the following undertakings: (a) to delete or destroy the relevant photographic images currently stored electronically on the officer’s computer; (b) to check whether any further copy of these images exists as a result of the ‘backing up’ of electronic data, and if a copy or copies does exist, to undertake further that these images will be deleted or destroyed; (3) Forests NSW will review its privacy policy and make such changes as are necessary to ensure that personal information in the form of photographic images is included, the implementation of such changes to include appropriate staff training; (4) SW’s claim for an award of damages is refused; (5) SW’s application for costs is refused

1 SW claims that Forests NSW contravened the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (‘the PPIP Act’) by taking inappropriate photographs of her and storing and publishing these. On an internal review, Forests NSW acknowledged that it may have breached some provisions of the PPIP Act, offered an unreserved apology and undertook to take other remedial action. SW applied to the Tribunal for a further review.

Background

2 SW, who is an expert in rainforest vegetation, is a member of a community organisation whose objectives include increasing community understanding of and participation in forest issues on the Central Coast of NSW. In early 2004, Forests NSW invited SW, at its expense, to accompany one of its officers and two other representatives of community organisations to a public meeting in Victoria on an experimental community forest management project (‘the Wombat project’), and to make a presentation at the meeting. SW agreed and claims there was discussion between the Hunter Regional Manager of Forests NSW and SW about Forests NSW taking photographs of SW at the meeting for publicity purposes. Shortly before leaving for the meeting, the Regional Manager, who was to attend the meeting with the three community organisation members and who had made the arrangements, was unable to…

Continue reading SW v Forests NSW

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
SW v Forests NSW [2006] NSWADT 74
Case
[2006] NSWADT 74
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

SW brought proceedings against Forests NSW, alleging that the collection, storage, and disclosure of photographs depicting SW were in breach of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998. The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia was tasked with determining whether Forests NSW had contravened specific sections of the Act and what remedies, if any, should be awarded to SW.

The court identified several legal issues central to the case. First, whether Forests NSW had unlawfully collected SW's personal information in the form of photographs without a lawful basis. Second, whether the collection of such photographs was necessary in the context of Forests NSW's functions or activities. Third, whether Forests NSW had disclosed SW's personal information to a third party without SW's consent. Fourth, whether Forests NSW had failed to take reasonable steps to ensure the security of SW's personal information. Lastly, the court had to determine the appropriate remedies for SW.

The court found that Forests NSW had contravened sections 8, 10, 11, 16, and 18 of the Act. The officer had collected SW's personal information without a lawful basis and had disclosed the photographs to a third party without SW's consent. Additionally, Forests NSW had not taken reasonable steps to ensure the security of the collected information. The court held that the collection and storage of the photographs were unnecessary and that the disclosure to a third party was unlawful. Consequently, the court ordered Forests NSW to provide SW with an unreserved public apology, delete or destroy the relevant images, review and update its privacy policy, and implement staff training. The court refused SW's claim for damages and application for costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) I find that Forests NSW contravened sections 8, 10, 11, 16 and 18 of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998; (2) Forests NSW will provide SW with an unreserved public apology in respect of these contraventions and provide SW with the following undertakings: (a) to delete or destroy the relevant photographic images currently stored electronically on the officer’s computer; (b) to check whether any further copy of these images exists as a result of the ‘backing up’ of electronic data, and if a copy or copies does exist, to undertake further that these images will be deleted or destroyed; (3) Forests NSW will review its privacy policy and make such changes as are necessary to ensure that personal information in the form of photographic images is included, the implementation of such changes to include appropriate staff training; (4) SW’s claim for an award of damages is refused; (5) SW’s application for costs is refused

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.