Legal Research
Cases
Suzhou Haishun Investment Management Co. Ltd v Yue'e Zhao & Ors

Suzhou Haishun Investment Management Co. Ltd v Yue'e Zhao & Ors

Case [2019] VSC 110

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Suzhou Haishun Investment Management Co Ltd v Zhao [2019] VSC 110
Case: [2019] VSC 110
Decision Date: 27 February 2019

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Suzhou Haishun Investment Management Co Ltd v Zhao [2019] VSC 110

Most Recent Citation

Wu v Yin [2022] VSC 729

Cases Citing This Decision

Shanghai Chenggong Industrial Co Ltd v Zhihua Chen [2025] NSWSC 1112
Citation 1 (Para 5)

…n: Bao at [29], citing Stern v National Australia Bank Ltd [1999] FCA 1421 at [133] (Tamberlin J); Suzhou Haishun Investment Management Co Ltd v Zhao [2019] VSC 110 at [92] (Cameron J).…
Yangpu Huigu Pharmaceutical Corporation Limited v He [2025] NSWSC 28
Citation 2 (Para 92)

…; National Australia Bank Ltd v Pollack [1999] FCA 1421 at [133] (Tamberlin J); Suzhou Haishun Investment Management Co. Ltd v Yue’e Zhao & Ors [2019] VSC 110 at [92].”…
Ferris v Sanguine Investment Managers LLC [2024] NSWSC 1073
Citation 3 (Para 92)

…k; National Australia Bank Ltd v Pollack [1999] FCA 1421 at [133] (Tamberlin J); S uzhou Haishun Investment Management Co. Ltd v Yue’e Zhao & Ors [2019] VSC 110 at [92].”…
Zhengzhou Lvdu Real Estate Group Co Ltd v Shu [2024] NSWSC 58
Citation 4 (Para 92)

…nk; National Australia Bank Ltd v Pollack [1999] FCA 1421 at [133] (Tamberlin J); Suzhou Haishun Investment Management Co. Ltd v Yue’e Zhao & Ors [2019] VSC 110 at [92].”…
Bank of China Limited v Chen (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1168
Citation 5 (Para 92)

…; National Australia Bank Ltd v Pollack [1999] FCA 1421 at [133] (Tamberlin J); Suzhou Haishun Investment Management Co. Ltd v Yue’e Zhao & Ors [2019] VSC 110 at [92].”…
Tianjin Yingtong Materials Co Ltd v Young [2022] NSWSC 943
Citation 6 (Para 92)

…nk; National Australia Bank Ltd v Pollack [1999] FCA 1421 at [133] (Tamberlin J); Suzhou Haishun Investment Management Co. Ltd v Yue’e Zhao & Ors [2019] VSC 110 at [92].”…
Bank of China Limited v Chen [2022] NSWSC 749
Citation 7 (Para 92)

…; National Australia Bank Ltd v Pollack [1999] FCA 1421 at [133] (Tamberlin J); Suzhou Haishun Investment Management Co. Ltd v Yue’e Zhao & Ors [2019] VSC 110 at [92].”…
Hebei Huaneng Industrial Development Co Ltd v Shi [2020] NZHC 2992
Citation 8

…tandard Oil (1918) 224 NY 99 at 111. 21 Wei v Li [2019] BCCA 114; Chen v Lin [2016] NZCA 113; Suzhou Haishun Investment Management Company Ltd v Zhao [2019] VSC 110; Liu v Guan Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Queens, 7 January 2020; Qiu v Zhang United States District Court, Central District Cali…
Shafston Avenue Construction Pty Ltd v McCann [2020] FCAFC 85
Citation 9 (Para 7)

…on two judgments of the Supreme Court of Victoria, namely Liu v Ma (2017) 55 VR 104 ( Liu ) and Suzhou Haishun Investment Management Co Ltd v Zhao [2019] VSC 110 ( Suzhou ), in support of a submission that a reciprocity requirement (for recognition of an Australian judgment in China) would be satisfied. These ca…
Bao v Qu; Tian (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 588
Citation 10 (Para 29)

…Bank; National Australia Bank Ltd v Pollack [1999] FCA 1421 at [133] (Tamberlin J); Suzhou Haishun Investment Management Co. Ltd v Yue’e Zhao & Ors [2019] VSC 110 at [92].…
Zhao v Suzhou Haishun Investment Management Co Ltd [2020] VSCA 34
Citation 11 (Para 1)

…Chinese judgments were registered against her by orders made in the trial division. [1] Suzhou Haishun Investment Management Co Ltd v Yue’e Zhao [2019] VSC 110, [114] (‘Primary reasons’). [2]Primary reasons [93(a)]. [3]Primary reasons [93(d)].…
Fu v Pang [2025] VSC 597
Citation 12 (Para 24)

…In Suzhou Haishun Investment Management Co Ltd v Zhao [2019] VSC 110 (‘ Suzhou Haishan ’) Cameron J also dealt with Schnabel in these terms: [99] Against this should be balanced the decision of Bergin J in Schnabel v Yung Lui , in which her Honour declined to enforce an award of punitive damages by a United State…
Wu v Yin [2022] VSC 729
Citation 13 (Para 1)

…lia (LexisNexis Australia, 8th ed, 2010), 895 [40.2]. [48][2015] VSC 75 ( Doe ). [49]Ibid, [56]; Suzhou Haishun Investment Management Co Ltd v Zhao [2019] VSC 110, [89] ( Suzhou ); Xu v Wang (2019) 58 VR 536, 555 [74] ( Xu ). [50] Doe (n 48), [56] (citations omitted). These four conditions are also set out in the…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Re Tang [2017] VSCA 171
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…ce was advanced by Ms Zhao as to this issue. However, this, in itself, is no barrier to the Court considering extraneous material.[2] [2] Re Tang (2017) 52 VR 786, 803-4 [64].…
Mutton v Baker [2014] VSCA 43
Citation 2

…decisions. See, e.g., Slaveska v Elenchevski [2013] VSCA 283 [34] (Neave JA); Lubura v Nezirevic (2013) 42 VR 43, 44 n 2 (Warren CJ); Mutton v Baker [2014] VSCA 43 [18] (Santamaria JA); Doe v Howard [2015] VSC 75 [54] (J Forrest J).…
Slaveska v Elenchevski [2013] VSCA 283
Citation 3

…[3](2013) 42 VR 27, 40 [35]. The decision has been cited with approval in a number of subsequent decisions. See, e.g., Slaveska v Elenchevski [2013] VSCA 283 [34] (Neave JA); Lubura v Nezirevic (2013) 42 VR 43, 44 n 2 (Warren CJ); Mutton v Baker [2014] VSCA 43 [18] (Santamaria JA); Doe v Howard [2015] VSC 75 [54]…
Lubura v Nezirevic [2013] VSCA 215
Citation 4

…s been cited with approval in a number of subsequent decisions. See, e.g., Slaveska v Elenchevski [2013] VSCA 283 [34] (Neave JA); Lubura v Nezirevic (2013) 42 VR 43, 44 n 2 (Warren CJ); Mutton v Baker [2014] VSCA 43 [18] (Santamaria JA); Doe v Howard [2015] VSC 75 [54] (J Forrest J).…
Lysaght Building Solutions Pty Ltd v Blanalko Pty Ltd [2013] VSCA 158
Citation 5

…[2002] NSWSC 15; Benefit Strategies Group Inc v Prider (2005) 91 SASR 544; Hausman v Abigroup (2009) 29 VR 213; Lysaght v Blanalko (2013) 42 VR 27; Re Tang (2017) 52 VR 786 referred to.…
Hausman v Abigroup Contractors Pty Ltd [2009] VSCA 288
Citation 6

…[1999] FCA 1421; Schnabel v Yung Lui [2002] NSWSC 15; Benefit Strategies Group Inc v Prider (2005) 91 SASR 544; Hausman v Abigroup (2009) 29 VR 213; Lysaght v Blanalko (2013) 42 VR 27; Re Tang (2017) 52 VR 786 referred to.…
Benefit Strategies Group Inc v Prider [2007] SASC 250
Citation 7 (Para 1)

…nition of the plaintiff’s contumelious disregard for the private rights of the defendant, and did not contain any ‘public element’.[27] [27](2005) 91 SASR 544, 565 [68] (‘ Benefit Strategies Group ’).…
Benefit Strategies Group Inc v Prider [2005] SASC 194
Citation 8

…C 150; Stern v National Australia Bank; National Australia Bank Ltd v Pollack [1999] FCA 1421; Schnabel v Yung Lui [2002] NSWSC 15; Benefit Strategies Group Inc v Prider (2005) 91 SASR 544; Hausman v Abigroup (2009) 29 VR 213; Lysaght v Blanalko (2013) 42 VR 27; Re Tang (2017) 52 VR 786 referred to.…
Boele v Norsemeter Holding AS [2002] NSWCA 363
Citation 9 (Para 1)

…amberlin J). [21] Norsemeter Holding AS v Boele (No 1) [2002] NSWSC 370 [14] (Einstein J) (reversed on other grounds in Boele v Norsemeter Holding AS [2002] NSWCA 363). [22] Ellis v M’Henry (1871) LR 6 CP 228.…
Norsemeter Holdings AS v Boele (No 1) [2002] NSWSC 370
Citation 10 (Para 1)

…Stern v National Australia Bank; National Australia Bank Ltd v Pollack [1999] FCA 1421 [133] (Tamberlin J). [21] Norsemeter Holding AS v Boele (No 1) [2002] NSWSC 370 [14] (Einstein J) (reversed on other grounds in Boele v Norsemeter Holding AS [2002] NSWCA 363). [22] Ellis v M’Henry (1871) LR 6 CP 228.…
Schnabel v Lui [2002] NSWSC 15
Citation 11 (Para 1)

…deter others from failing to comply with the court’s orders’.[28] As such, the award was imposed for public purposes. [28] Schnabel v Yung Lui [2002] NSWSC 15 (1 February 2002) [176].…
Stern v National Australia Bank [1999] FCA 1421
Citation 12 (Para 1)

…wever, the judgment is prima facie enforceable as a valid obligation.[12] [12] Stern v National Australia Bank; National Australia Bank Ltd v Pollack [1999] FCA 1421 [133] (Tamberlin J).…
General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) [1964] HCA 69
Citation 13

…araphrase or comparison with the ‘hopeless’ or ‘bound to fail test’ essayed in General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125;…
Doe v Howard [2015] VSC 75
Citation 14

…3] VSCA 283 [34] (Neave JA); Lubura v Nezirevic (2013) 42 VR 43, 44 n 2 (Warren CJ); Mutton v Baker [2014] VSCA 43 [18] (Santamaria JA); Doe v Howard [2015] VSC 75 [54] (J Forrest J).…

AI Chat coming soon