Sutherland v The Queen

Case [2016] NSWDC 266


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Sutherland v R [2016] NSWDC 266
Hearing dates:6 - 7 June 2016
Date of orders: 07 June 2016
Decision date: 07 June 2016
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Neilson DCJ
Decision:

Appeal allowed

 

Sentence passed by the Local Court at Sutherland on 3 March 2016 set aside

 Appellant sentenced to good behaviour bond for a period of 18 months
Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Severity appeal – Assault occasioning actual bodily harm – Coward punch – Appellant suffers from borderline personality disorder – At time of the offence appellant was having medication adjusted – At time of the offence appellant was consuming alcohol – Appellant aware that alcohol would affect efficacy of medication – Appellant suffering from mental condition for purposes of s 32(1) Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 – More appropriate to deal with appellant according to law – No direct medical evidence of victim’s injuries – Full-time custodial sentence excessive
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990
Cases Cited: Pattalis v R [2013] NSWCCA 171
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Brittany Jade Sutherland (Appellant)
Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Respondent)
Representation: Mr P Kondich (Appellant)
Counsel for the Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Respondent)
File Number(s):2015/150946
Publication restriction:No
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
Sutherland Local Court
Jurisdiction:
Criminal
Date of Decision:
3 March 2016
Before:
Bartley LCM
File Number(s):
2015/00150946

Judgment

  1. HIS HONOUR: This is an appeal against severity of sentence passed by Magistrate Bartley sitting in the Local Court at Sutherland on 3 March 2016. The appellant was charged with an offence contrary to s 59(1) of the Crimes Act 1900. The charge was assault occasioning actual bodily harm to Emma Sciberras at Miranda on 22 February 2015 at approximately 1.45am.

  2. The assault occurred at the Miranda Hotel situated on The Kingsway at Miranda. It was in the early hours of a Sunday morning. It is evident from the facts that the appellant and her boyfriend had been in the hotel for some time. Another patron, Ms Sciberras, had borrowed the appellant’s boyfriend’s cigarette lighter and had failed to return it promptly. About half an hour after the cigarette lighter had been borrowed, the appellant confronted Ms Sciberras. Ms Sciberras was in the poker machine area. The appellant and her boyfriend entered the poker machine area and walked up to Ms Sciberras who was standing at one of the machines. The appellant stood about half a metre in front of the victim facing her. She asked the victim to return her boyfriend’s cigarette lighter, and the appellant then punched Ms Sciberras in the face with a closed fist. The impact caused Ms Sciberras to fall backwards onto the ground, striking her head after having landed on her back. The appellant then stepped towards the victim and stood looking down at her while other patrons of the hotel came to the scene. Ms Sciberras stood up and, clearly, the…

Continue reading Sutherland v The Queen

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Sutherland v The Queen [2016] NSWDC 266
Case
[2016] NSWDC 266
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Sutherland v The Queen, the appellant was convicted of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, a crime committed through a cowardly punch. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, where the appellant sought to appeal the severity of the sentence imposed by the Local Court. The appellant contended that at the time of the offence, he was undergoing adjustments to his medication and was consuming alcohol, which he knew would affect the efficacy of his medication. Additionally, the appellant has a diagnosed borderline personality disorder, which he argued should be considered under section 32(1) of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990. The appellant submitted that his mental condition should have been taken into account when determining the appropriate sentence.

The central legal issues before the court were whether the appellant's mental health and the circumstances surrounding the offence warranted a reduction in the severity of the sentence. The court needed to determine whether the appellant's borderline personality disorder and the consumption of alcohol, despite knowing its effect on his medication, constituted mitigating factors warranting a lesser sentence. The court also had to assess whether the full-time custodial sentence imposed was excessive given the circumstances.

The court considered the appellant's borderline personality disorder and the mitigating factors presented, including the appellant's awareness of the impact of alcohol on his medication. The court found that the appellant's mental condition and the specific circumstances of the offence warranted a reduction in the severity of the sentence. The court concluded that a full-time custodial sentence was excessive, and that a good behaviour bond for a period of 18 months was more appropriate. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the sentence imposed by the Local Court was set aside.

Orders

Orders of the court

Appeal allowed

Sentence passed by the Local Court at Sutherland on 3 March 2016 set aside

Appellant sentenced to good behaviour bond for a period of 18 months

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.