Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 23 November 2015

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 23 NOVEMBER 2015

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
BSC
Melissa Louise Dance

For Bail Consent
Jack Owen Read
NLW

For Trial
Tu Ai Lin
(Part Heard)

4:00 p.m.
In Court as In Chambers
For Bail Application
Brody Lincoln French
Dylan Keith Knight
Zeke Charles Kevin Godfrey

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as In Chambers
3.00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Stephen John Williams

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before JUSTICE PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)

David Ronald Morgan

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Mention
Nathan Scott Davidson
Gene Boyer Jaehne
Derek George Arnol

To Follow
For Trial (Part-Heard)

Christopher John Humphreys
Luke James Reader

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via Video-Link to Launceston Remand Centre
Timothy Peter Hingston

For Mention
Nicholas Mark Anderson

SFW

Nathan Gregory Coppleman

For Trial
Tony John Travers

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a variety of cases were scheduled for the law list dated 23 November 2015. Notable cases included bail consent for Jack Owen Read, a bail application for Brody Lincoln French and Dylan Keith Knight, and a trial for Tu Ai Lin, which was heard partially that day. The court heard cases in various locations including Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie, with different justices presiding over the hearings. Each case pertained to criminal matters, ranging from bail applications to part-heard trials.

The legal issues in these cases primarily revolved around the granting of bail and the continuation or commencement of criminal trials. For bail applications, the court needed to assess whether the applicants met the criteria for bail under the relevant legislation, considering factors such as the seriousness of the offence, the likelihood of the accused appearing in court, and the risk of flight or interference with witnesses. For the trials, the court had to manage the procedural aspects of the ongoing cases, ensuring that the trials proceeded in an orderly and just manner.

The court's reasoning and outcome for each case were not detailed in the provided excerpt, but it is customary for the court to provide detailed judgments on bail applications and to manage the logistics of trials based on the evidence and submissions presented. Each bail application would have been evaluated on a case-by-case basis, considering the individual circumstances of the applicants. In terms of trials, the court would have ensured that all legal and procedural requirements were met, and would have directed the proceedings accordingly.

No specific final orders were mentioned in the provided excerpt, but in general, the court would have made orders pertaining to bail conditions if granted, or continued the trials as scheduled, possibly making interim orders to manage the proceedings.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established