QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
CITATION:
Sundale Limited [2019] QCAT 83
PARTIES:
SUNDALE LIMITED
(applicant)
APPLICATION NO/S:
ADL033-18
MATTER TYPE:
Anti-discrimination matters
DELIVERED ON:
6 March 2019
HEARING DATE:
On the papers
HEARD AT:
Brisbane
DECISION OF:
Member Gordon
ORDERS:
1. The following exemption order applies to:-
(a) Sundale Ltd; and
(b) other people involved from time to time in providing the services offered by the Better Together Housing Project;
as a class of people under section 113(1) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld).
2. When providing the services offered by the Better Together Housing Project substantially in the form described in the application for exemption to the tribunal, or when doing or omitting to do any act in providing those services, the class is exempt from the operation of section 46 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld) in so far as section 46 would otherwise apply to discrimination on the basis of age or sex.
3. This exemption continues for a period of time from the date of this order being the shorter of:-
(a) the period over which the Better Together Housing Project continues substantially in the form described in the application to the tribunal for exemption; or
(b) the period of five years.
CATCHWORDS:
HUMAN RIGHTS – DISCRIMINATION LEGISLATION – where the applicant on behalf of a class of people seeks an exemption from the operation of a specified provision of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld) in order to operate the ‘Better Together Housing Project’ – where the Anti-Discrimination Commissioner supports the application – whether the exemption should be granted
Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld), s 113
Boeing Australia Holdings Pty Ltd & related entities [2003] QADT 21
CISC Pty Ltd t/as The Construction Training Centre [2017] QCAT 301
Exemption application re: Palmpoint Pty Ltd [2006] QADT 12REPRESENTATION:
Applicant:
Julian Porter, solicitor of Suncoast Community Legal Service
APPEARANCES:
This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to s 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld).
REASONS FOR DECISION
The Applicant, Sundale Limited wishes to restrict access to the services of the Better Together Housing Project to women aged 55 and over.
Sundale has filed affidavit evidence in support of this application.[1] From this evidence it can be seen that Sundale Ltd is a non-profit organisation operating on the Sunshine Coast. It operates four retirement villages, six aged care centres and in-home care programs for older people in locations across the region.
[1]Affidavits of Gail Middleton made on 6 July 2018 and 9 January 2019.
The evidence demonstrates that the Better Together Housing Project is an attempt to tackle the issue of older women who find themselves with poor housing security.
It is said that older women are at greater risk of housing insecurity than older men because women tend to be poorer than men in the same age group, and therefore less likely to own their own home and more likely to find it difficult in the private rental market. They…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Sundale Limited and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2019] QCAT 83
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved the interpretation and application of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld). The primary question was whether the exemption should be granted to Sundale Limited and the other people involved in the Better Together Housing Project to avoid the discriminatory effects of the Act's provisions. The court needed to consider the purpose of the Act, the nature of the project, and the potential impact on the class of people involved. It was also necessary to weigh the Commissioner's support against any potential conflicts with the Act's overarching objectives.
The court found that the exemption should be granted. It reasoned that the Better Together Housing Project aimed to provide essential housing services in a way that was specifically designed to avoid discrimination on the basis of age or sex. The court noted that the Anti-Discrimination Commissioner's support was a significant factor, indicating that the exemption would not undermine the objectives of the Act. The exemption was limited to the duration of the project or five years, whichever was shorter, to ensure ongoing compliance with the Act's principles.
The court ordered that the exemption applies to Sundale Limited and others involved in the Better Together Housing Project. The exemption exempts them from the operation of section 46 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld) concerning discrimination on the basis of age or sex. This exemption is in place for the duration of the project or five years, whichever is shorter, ensuring that the project can proceed while maintaining compliance with the Act's discrimination provisions.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The following exemption order applies to:-
(a) Sundale Ltd; and
(b) other people involved from time to time in providing the services offered by the Better Together Housing Project;
as a class of people under section 113(1) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld).
2. When providing the services offered by the Better Together Housing Project substantially in the form described in the application for exemption to the tribunal, or when doing or omitting to do any act in providing those services, the class is exempt from the operation of section 46 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld) in so far as section 46 would otherwise apply to discrimination on the basis of age or sex.
3. This exemption continues for a period of time from the date of this order being the shorter of:-
(a) the period over which the Better Together Housing Project continues substantially in the form described in the application to the tribunal for exemption; or
(b) the period of five years.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.