FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| STUART & LAWSON | [2015] FCCA 3299 |
| Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – Property – Application for leave to institute property proceedings out of time – long delay in commencing proceedings – hardship established – leave granted. |
| Legislation: Family Law Act 1975, ss.44(3), 44, 75, 79, 90D |
| In the Marriage of Hall (1979) 5 Fam LR 411 In the Marriage of Whitford (1979) FLC 90-612 Montano & Kinross [2014] FamCAFC 231 Sharp & Sharp [2011] FamCAFC 150 Slocomb & Hedgewood [2015] FamCAFC 219 |
| Applicant: | MS STUART |
| Respondent: | MR LAWSON |
| File Number: | SYC 2742 of 2015 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Sexton |
| Hearing date: | 12 November 2015 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 12 November 2015 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 10 December 2015 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr Blackah |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | McDermott and Associates |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Ms Sproston |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Alexanders Lawyers |
ORDERS
The Wife be granted leave to institute property proceedings out of time.
The Applicant’s legal representative forthwith advise the Registrar of the Supreme Court of these orders.
The matter be adjourned for mention before me at 9.30a.m. on 11 March 2016.
Each party respond promptly to any request for financial information.
By no later than 28 January 2016, the parties engage an accredited real estate valuer to prepare a joint valuation of the Property A property and share equally the costs of such valuation.
By no later than 28 January 2016, the parties exchange Superannuation Information Forms in relation to all superannuation entitlements held by each of them.
The Applicant’s solicitor provide the Court with a collaboratively prepared balance sheet on the adjourned date.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Stuart & Lawson is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYC 2742 of 2015
| MS STUART |
Applicant
And
| MR LAWSON |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
The Wife has filed an application for leave to institute property proceedings over 7 years out of time pursuant to section 44(3) of the Family Law Act 1975. The Husband opposes the application and seeks costs.
Each party was represented by counsel at the hearing.
Background
The Wife is 46 years of age. The Husband is 49 years of age. Both were born in (country omitted). They married on (omitted) 1998, and migrated to Australia in the same year. They separated under the one roof in 2003 and lived in separate residences from February 2004. The parties’ divorce became final on 13 November 2006.
There are three Children of the marriage, X aged 16 years, Y aged 15 years and Z aged 11 years.
After separation, the Children remained living with the Wife, initially in rented accommodation in (omitted). The Husband remained living in the former matrimonial home in Property A. In June 2004, the Children and the Mother relocated to (country omitted) and remained living there until December 2013, when the Mother, her second husband, their child together,…
Continue reading STUART & LAWSON
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Stuart and Lawson [2015] FCCA 3299
- Case
- [2015] FCCA 3299
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether to grant the wife leave to commence property proceedings after the expiry of the statutory time limit. This required the court to consider the relevant factors and principles governing such applications.
Judge Sexton granted the wife leave to institute property proceedings out of time. The court also made several procedural orders aimed at progressing the matter, including requiring the parties to obtain a joint valuation of a property, exchange superannuation information, and prepare a collaboratively prepared balance sheet. The matter was adjourned for mention.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The Wife be granted leave to institute property proceedings out of time.
2.
The Applicant’s legal representative forthwith advise the Registrar of the Supreme Court of these orders.
3.
The matter be adjourned for mention before me at 9.30a.m. on 11 March 2016.
4.
Each party respond promptly to any request for financial information.
5.
By no later than 28 January 2016, the parties engage an accredited real estate valuer to prepare a joint valuation of the Property A property and share equally the costs of such valuation.
6.
By no later than 28 January 2016, the parties exchange Superannuation Information Forms in relation to all superannuation entitlements held by each of them.
7.
The Applicant’s solicitor provide the Court with a collaboratively prepared balance sheet on the adjourned date.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.