This content is currently unavailable.
- AGLC
- Streicholz Fabrik Pty Ltd v Taylor [2023] VSC 240
- Case
- [2023] VSC 240
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
AI summary not yet generated for this case.
Orders
Orders of the court
ORDERS
229. As a result, the following orders are appropriate:
(a) The defendants’ application in paragraph 1 of their amended summons for judgment, pursuant to r 23.01 of the Rules, is refused.
(b) The defendants’ application in paragraphs 2 and 10 of their amended summons for summary judgment, pursuant to s 63 of the Civil Procedure Act, is refused.
(c) The defendants’ application in paragraph 3 of their amended summons to strike out, pursuant to r 23.02 of the Rules, the plaintiffs’ claim of abandonment of the Heads of Agreement (paragraphs 11, 12 and 13 and paragraphs AA and B of the prayer for relief (insofar as paragraph B refers to paragraph AA) is granted and those parts of the amended statement of claim are struck out with a right to replead.
230. I will hear from the parties on the precise form of orders, including costs.
231. The parties are requested to confer and provide a draft form of order, or in the absence of agreement, forms of order and submissions (limited to 3 pages), to chambers by 4:00pm on 26 May 2023.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.