DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Strain v Walsh [2011] QDC 165
PARTIES:
In the matter of the Succession Act 1981
And
In the matter of the Will of DAVID STRAIN late of 8 Cassia Court Palm Beach in the State of Queensland formerly of 3/168 Musgrave Road, Red Hill, Brisbane in the State of Queensland
And
In the matter of an Application by KATHLEEN WALSH (also known as KAY STRAIN) of 8 Cassia Court, Palm Beach in the State of Queensland under Part IV of the said Act
FILE NO/S:
D475/98
PROCEEDING:
Application
ORIGINATING COURT:
District Court, Southport
DELIVERED ON:
12 August 2011
DELIVERED AT:
Southport
HEARING DATE:
1 August 2011
JUDGE:
Newton DCJ
ORDER:
1. With respect to the application dated 20 June 2011, filed on behalf of the applicant Ms Walsh, I order that Shirley Kathleen Stapleton as executrix of the estate of the late Kathleen Walsh be substituted as the applicant in this proceeding and that there be no order as to costs.
2. With respect to the application dated 21 November 2008, filed on behalf of the applicant Ms Walsh, I order that the application be dismissed and that there be no order as to costs.
3. With respect to the application dated 19 May 2011, filed on behalf of the respondent executor for the estate of David Strain, I order that:
(1) leave to proceed be granted;
(2) the order of her Honour Judge Dick SC dated 12 January 2009 be set aside;
(3) the matter proceed to hearing before this Court as to the quantum of award (if any) Ms Walsh would have been entitled to in respect of the period between the date of Mr Strain’s death, 17 October 1997, and the date of the death of Ms Walsh, 8 November 2008; and
(4) the costs of and incidental to the application as between Solicitor and own client be assessed and paid out of the estate of David Strain.
CATCHWORDS:
SUCCESSION – FAMILY PROVISION AND MAINTENANCE – Application for further provision from deceased estate – applicant dies before determination of application – Court not notified of applicant’s death when orders made for further provision – effect of death of applicant prior to Court order being made.
The Succession Act 1981 (Qld)
The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld)
Albany v Albany [2010] NTSC 25 (24 May 2010)
Hills v Chalk & Anor (as executors of the estate of Chalk (deceased)) [2008] QCA 159
Groser v Equity Trustees [2008] VSC 163
COUNSEL:
Mr DJ Morgan for the executor of the estate of David Strain.
Mr MJ Campbell for the executrix of the estate of Kathleen Walsh.
SOLICITORS:
Robbins Watson for the executor of the estate of David Strain.
O’Neills Solicitors for the executrix of the estate of Kathleen Walsh.
Kathleen Walsh (also known as Kay Strain) brought an application in this Court[1] seeking an order that adequate…
Continue reading Strain v Walsh
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Strain v Walsh [2011] QDC 165
- Case
- [2011] QDC 165
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were the status of the applications filed by Walsh for further provision from Strain's estate and the impact of her death before the applications were decided. Specifically, the court had to determine whether the applications could proceed posthumously and, if so, how they should be handled in light of Walsh's death. Additionally, the court needed to address the executor's application to set aside an earlier order and determine the quantum of any award that Walsh might have been entitled to.
The court found that the application dated 20 June 2011, filed on behalf of Walsh, could not proceed posthumously as Walsh had died before any orders were made. Consequently, Shirley Kathleen Stapleton, as executrix of Walsh's estate, was substituted as the applicant. However, the application dated 21 November 2008 was dismissed as Walsh had already died before it could be decided. Regarding the executor's application, the court granted leave to proceed and set aside an earlier order, scheduling a hearing to determine the quantum of any award Walsh might have been entitled to for the period between Strain's death and Walsh's death. Costs for the executor's application were to be borne by Strain's estate.
In conclusion, the court ordered that Stapleton be substituted as the applicant in the 2011 application, dismissed the 2008 application, granted leave to proceed with the executor's application, set aside a previous order, and scheduled a hearing to determine the quantum of any award Walsh might have been entitled to. Costs for the executor's application were to be paid out of Strain's estate.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. With respect to the application dated 20 June 2011, filed on behalf of the applicant Ms Walsh, I order that Shirley Kathleen Stapleton as executrix of the estate of the late Kathleen Walsh be substituted as the applicant in this proceeding and that there be no order as to costs.
2. With respect to the application dated 21 November 2008, filed on behalf of the applicant Ms Walsh, I order that the application be dismissed and that there be no order as to costs.
3. With respect to the application dated 19 May 2011, filed on behalf of the respondent executor for the estate of David Strain, I order that:
(1) leave to proceed be granted;
(2) the order of her Honour Judge Dick SC dated 12 January 2009 be set aside;
(3) the matter proceed to hearing before this Court as to the quantum of award (if any) Ms Walsh would have been entitled to in respect of the period between the date of Mr Strain’s death, 17 October 1997, and the date of the death of Ms Walsh, 8 November 2008; and
(4) the costs of and incidental to the application as between Solicitor and own client be assessed and paid out of the estate of David Strain.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.