LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: Stoverink, B v Higgins; Stoverink, A v Higgins [2016] QLC 26* PARTIES: Bernardus Johannes Maria Stoverink
(applicant MRA389-15)Antonius Gerhardus Albertus Stoverink
(applicant MRA388-15)v Andrew Massey Home Higgins
(respondent)FILE NO: MRA388-15 & MRA389-15 DIVISION: General Division PROCEEDING: Determination of compensation for renewal of mining claims DELIVERED ON: 21 April 2016 DELIVERED AT: Brisbane HEARD ON: Submissions closed on 11 November 2015 HEARD AT: Heard on the papers JUDICIAL REGISTRAR: GJ Smith ORDERS: 1. In respect of MC60049 compensation is determined in an amount of $45 per annum in respect of the renewal period of 5 years, giving a total amount of $225.
2. That Bernardus Johannes Maria Stoverink
pay compensation to the respondent in the amount set out in Order 1 within one month from notification of the renewal of the mining claim by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines.
3. In respect of MC60301 compensation is determined in an amount of $410 per annum in respect of the renewal period of 10 years, giving a total amount of $4100.
4. That Antonius Gerhardus Albertus Stoverink
pay compensation to the respondent in the amount set out in order 3 within four months from notification of the renewal of the mining claim by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines.
CATCHWORDS: MINING CLAIM – determination of compensation -renewal – factors to be considered – weight of material provided – impact of mining and drought conditions.
Mineral Resources Act 1989, s 85
Land Court Rules 2000, Rule 36AFazzari v Colonial Agricultural Company Limited [2003] QLRT 38
Mitchell v Oakhill and Mitchell (Unreported, Land Court of Queensland, JJ Trickett, President, 10 March 1998)
Wills v Minerva Coal Pty Ltd [No 2] (1998) 19 QLCR 297APPEARANCES: Not applicable
This matter involves two referrals to the Land Court pursuant to s 85(5) of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (MRA) for the determination of compensation in respect of the renewal of a mining claim.
Background
Bernardus Johannes Maria Stoverink applied for the renewal of Mining Claim 60049 on 23 January 2015 and Antonius Gerhardus Albertus Stoverink applied for the renewal of Mining Claim 60301 on 30 March 2015. The land upon which the Mining Claims are located is approximately 80 km north-west of Cunnamulla in the Quilpie District. The land is within the Paroo Shire Council local government area. The purpose of the proposed renewal is for the mining of opal, gemstones and corundum.
The land upon which the Mining Claims and access tracks are situated is known as Boobera Station and is owned by Andrew Massey Home Higgins (the respondent). The land is more particularly described as Lot 21 on Plan HU 53 and is approximately 26452.73 hectares in area. The opal mined on Boobera Station is known as the Koroit Opal.
The specific Land Court reference and tenure details are set out as follows:
Court Reference Tenure ID Tenure Area Access Term MRA388-15 MC60301 12.67 ha 1 km 10 years MRA389-15 MC60049
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Stoverink, A v Higgins and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2016] QLC 26
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to decide whether the Registrar had erred in determining the compensation for the renewal of the mining claims. The court had to consider the weight of the material provided and the impact of mining and drought conditions on the value of the claims.
The court found that the Registrar had properly considered the relevant factors in determining the compensation. The court held that the Registrar had considered the weight of the material provided and the impact of mining and drought conditions on the value of the claims. The court also held that the Registrar had not erred in determining the compensation. The court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Registrar's decision.
The court ordered that Bernardus Johannes Maria Stoverink pay compensation of $225 in respect of the renewal of mining claim MC60049. The court also ordered that Antonius Gerhardus Albertus Stoverink pay compensation of $4100 in respect of the renewal of mining claim MC60301.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. In respect of MC60049 compensation is determined in an amount of $45 per annum in respect of the renewal period of 5 years, giving a total amount of $225.
2. That Bernardus Johannes Maria Stoverink
pay compensation to the respondent in the amount set out in Order 1 within one month from notification of the renewal of the mining claim by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines.
3. In respect of MC60301 compensation is determined in an amount of $410 per annum in respect of the renewal period of 10 years, giving a total amount of $4100.
4. That Antonius Gerhardus Albertus Stoverink
pay compensation to the respondent in the amount set out in order 3 within four months from notification of the renewal of the mining claim by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.