Storry v Parkyn (Vexatious Proceedings Order)

Case

[2024] FCAFC 100

31 July 2024


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Storry v Parkyn (Vexatious Proceedings Order) [2024] FCAFC 100 [2024] FCAFC 100 31 July 2024

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court, the appellant, Ms Venetia Louise Storry, an undischarged bankrupt, faced a vexatious proceedings order after being deemed an "indefatigable litigant." The court considered whether to prohibit her from instituting proceedings in the Federal Court without leave, given her history of numerous litigious actions that consumed significant judicial resources. The Full Court, having noted Ms Storry's extensive history of vexatious litigation, proposed an order under section 37AO(2)(b) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth). Ms Storry was given the opportunity to be heard and requested an oral hearing to contest the proposed order. The court appointed an amicus curiae to assist, and both Ms Storry and the amicus provided written and oral submissions.

The legal issue revolved around whether it was appropriate to make a vexatious proceedings order against Ms Storry. Section 37AO of the FCA Act empowers the Court to make such orders if satisfied that a person has frequently instituted or conducted vexatious proceedings. The court must not make such an order without hearing the person or giving them an opportunity to be heard. The Full Court considered Ms Storry's conduct in various proceedings, her compliance with orders, and the overall impact of her litigation on the court system. The court determined that Ms Storry had indeed frequently instituted or conducted vexatious proceedings, justifying the imposition of a vexatious proceedings order.

The court concluded that it was appropriate to make the proposed order prohibiting Ms Storry from instituting any proceeding in the Federal Court without leave. The order was made pursuant to section 37AO(2)(b) of the FCA Act, and Ms Storry was prohibited from initiating any proceedings without first obtaining leave under section 37AR of the FCA Act. The decision was based on the extensive evidence of Ms Storry's vexatious litigation and the need to protect the court's resources from further unnecessary proceedings.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Civil Litigation & Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Vexatious Proceedings Order

  • Jurisdiction

  • Limitation Periods

  • Abuse of Process

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

36

Kelly v UNSW [2025] NSWDC 24
Kelly v UNSW [2025] NSWDC 24
Cases Cited

41

Statutory Material Cited

15

Talacko v Talacko [2009] VSC 98
Storry v Parkyn [2024] FCAFC 67