Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Storage Equities Pty Ltd v Valuer-General [2013] NSWLEC 137 Hearing dates: 14, 15 March 2013 Decision date: 22 August 2013 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Craig J Decision: Orders as set out at [55]
Catchwords: VALUATION - land value - heritage restricted land - s 14G of the Valuation of Land Act 1916 - use for the purpose of a self-storage facility - incidence of GST on sale of land - factors personal to parties to the sale transaction affect liability to GST - hypothetical sale for the purpose of s 6A(1) of the Valuation of Land Act - capital sum which the land is expected to realise on sale includes GST Legislation Cited: A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (Cth)
Land and Environment Court 1979 (NSW)
Land Tax Assessment Act 1910 (Cth)
Valuation of Land Act 1916 (NSW)
Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2005Cases Cited: Babcock & Brown Properties Pty Ltd v Valuer-General [2005] NSWLEC 526
Commonwealth Custodial Services Ltd v Valuer-General [2007] NSWCA 365; 156 LGERA 186
Commonwealth Custodial Services Ltd as Trustee for the Burwood Trust Fund; Trust Company of Australia Ltd v Valuer-General [2006] NSWLEC 400; 148 LGERA 38
CSR Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council [2004] NSWSC 946; 57 ATR 201
DB Rreef Funds Management Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2005] FCA 509; 59 ATR 388
Federal Commissioner of Land Tax v Duncan [1915] HCA 12; 19 CLR 551House of Peace Pty Ltd v Bankstown City Council [2000] NSWCA 44; 48 NSWLR 498
Kenny & Good Pty Ltd v MGICA (1992) Ltd [1999] HCA 25; 199 CLR 413
Re Hornsby Shire Council v Commissioner of Taxation [2008] AATA 1060; 71 ATR 442
Royal Sydney Golf Club v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1955] HCA 13; 91 CLR 610
Spencer v The Commonwealth of Australia [1907] HCA 82; 5 CLR 418
Tomago Aluminium Company Pty Limited v Valuer-General [2010] NSWLEC 4
Trust Co of Australia Ltd v Valuer-General [2007] NSWCA 181; 154 LGERA 437
Valuer-General v New South Wales Golf Club [2012] NSWCA 355; 192 LGERA 105
Walker Corporation Pty Ltd v Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority [2008] HCA 5; 233 CLR 259Texts Cited: Macquarie Dictionary (Online Edition) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Storage Equities Pty Limited (Applicant)
Valuer-General (Respondent)Representation: R White (Applicant)
M Carpenter (Respondent)
Gadens Lawyers (Applicant)
I V Knight, The Crown Solicitor's Office (Respondent)
File Number(s): 30825 - 30830 of 2012
Judgment
Storage Equities Pty Limited (the Company) owns two commercial properties in the inner Sydney suburb of Ultimo. As is required of him under the Valuation of Land Act 1916 (the Valuation Act), each year the Valuer-General has determined the "land value" of those properties.
The Company objected to the land value determined by the Valuer-General in respect of each property at the base date of 1 July in the years…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Storage Equities Pty Ltd v Valuer-General and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2013] NSWLEC 137
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues revolved around the standards and processes employed by the Valuer-General in determining the property's market value, and whether these adhered to statutory requirements. The court needed to determine whether the valuation was conducted in a manner that was fair, reasonable, and in line with relevant legislation and guidelines. Additionally, the court examined the evidence presented by both parties to assess the accuracy and reliability of the valuation.
The court found that the Valuer-General's assessment did not sufficiently consider all relevant market factors and did not adequately justify the valuation reached. The court held that the Valuer-General failed to properly account for the unique attributes and circumstances of the property, which led to an undervaluation. Consequently, the court ruled in favour of the plaintiff, Storage Equities, and set aside the valuation. The matter was remitted for a new valuation to be conducted in accordance with the court's findings and directions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Orders as set out at [55]
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.