SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Stewart v Stewart [2015] QSC 238
PARTIES:
MICHAEL ROBERT STEWART
(applicant)
v
CATHERINE ANN STEWART (AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE KENNETH RAYMOND STEWART)(respondent)
FILE NO:
SC No 96 of 2014
DIVISION:
Trial Division
PROCEEDING:
Originating Application
ORIGINATING COURT:
Supreme Court at Brisbane
DELIVERED ON:
26 August 2015
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
4 August 2015
JUDGE:
Applegarth J
ORDER:
The parties submit within seven days forms of order to make further provision for the applicant, Michael Robert Stewart, out of the estate of Kenneth Raymond Stewart in the amount of $850,000.
CATCHWORDS:
SUCCESSION – FAMILY PROVISION – REQUIREMENT FOR ADEQUATE AND PROPER MAINTENANCE – WHETHER APPLICANT LEFT WITH INSUFFICIENT PROVISION – CLAIMS BY CHILDREN – where applicant is son of deceased – where deceased did not provide for applicant in his will – where deceased's will appointed applicant's mother as executor and sole beneficiary – where applicant suffers from mental illness and lacks stable accommodation – where deceased did not make adequate provision for proper maintenance and support of applicant – what provision should be made for his proper maintenance and support – whether the provision should be by way of a protective trust
Succession Act 1981 (Qld), s 41(1)
Bondy v Vavros (Supreme Court of NSW, Young J, 29 August 1988, unreported), cited
Daley v Barton [2008] QSC 228, cited
Hampson v Hampson [2010] NSWCA 359, cited
Lowe v Lowe [2014] NSWSC 371, cited
McCosker v McCosker (1957) 97 CLR 566, cited
Poole v Barrow [2014] VSC 576, cited
Pizzino v Pizzino [2010] QSC 35, cited
Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201, applied
Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 221 CLR 191, appliedCOUNSEL:
C A Brewer for the applicant
D B Fraser QC for the respondent
SOLICITORS:
Wilson Ryan Grose for the applicant
Connolly Suthers for the respondent
The applicant, Michael Stewart, is the son of the late Kenneth Stewart, who died on
11 August 2013, leaving an estate of approximately $2.2 million. Michael Stewart was left nothing in his father’s will. His circumstances are dire. He suffers chronic post-traumatic stress disorder and other mental illnesses as a result of his 21 years’ service as a police officer in Victoria. He has been living in a car and in other unsatisfactory accommodation since February this year. As a result of his mental illness he has trouble maintaining relations. He has obligations to two teenage sons. Although he receives a disability pension, it has not been enough to meet his expenses, and he has substantial unpaid debts. He has reached the limits on his credit cards. He has insufficient income or wealth to secure accommodation so as to stabilise his personal life and to pay his debts.Although Kenneth Stewart told his son that he would be well looked after in his will, he made no provision for his son. The only will he apparently left was made on 3 May 1973. It…
Continue reading Stewart v Stewart
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Stewart v Stewart [2015] QSC 238
- Case
- [2015] QSC 238
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the statutory criteria under the Family Provision Act, focusing on whether Kenneth had indeed failed to provide for Michael’s proper maintenance and support. The court assessed Michael's current circumstances, his mental health, and lack of stable housing to determine the necessity for financial support. It considered the balance between the statutory rights of family members and the deceased's testamentary freedom. The court held that Kenneth had not made adequate provision for Michael, who was in clear need of financial support due to his mental health issues and unstable living situation. Consequently, the court directed that the estate should be adjusted to provide for Michael's proper maintenance and support, potentially through the establishment of a protective trust.
The court's reasoning led to the conclusion that Michael should receive $850,000 from his father's estate to address his needs. The court emphasised the importance of considering the applicant's specific circumstances, including his mental health and housing instability, in making its decision. The court ordered that the necessary forms of order be submitted within seven days to effect the provision for Michael’s maintenance and support.
Orders
Orders of the court
The parties submit within seven days forms of order to make further provision for the applicant, Michael Robert Stewart, out of the estate of Kenneth Raymond Stewart in the amount of $850,000.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.