NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CITATION: Sterling Estates Development Corporation Pty Limited v Malouf & Anor [2003] NSWCA 278
FILE NUMBER(S):
41012/02
HEARING DATE(S): 29 August 2003
JUDGMENT DATE: 02/10/2003
PARTIES:
Sterling Estates Development Pty Limited (Appellant)
Sam John Malouf (First Respondent)
Christine Malouf (Second Respondent)
JUDGMENT OF: Santow JA Tobias JA McColl JA
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): SC 3128/02
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Young CJ in Eq
COUNSEL:
M Cashion SC/S White (Appellant)
M Pesman (Respondents)
SOLICITORS:
Kemp Strang (Appellant)
Patrick Hargraves & Co (Respondents)
CATCHWORDS:
CONTRACT - construction - contract for the construction and sale of an apartment and car space - construction of "Special Faults" clause - D
LEGISLATION CITED:
Public Health Act 1952 (NSW)
DECISION:
1. Appeal allowed. 2. Order that the declarations and orders made by Young CJ in Eq on 24 October 2002 be set aside. 3. Declare that the Notice of Termination dated 3 June 2002 served by the appellant on the respondents in respect of the Contract for the Sale of Land dated 14 February 2000 in relation to Part FI 1/874004 known as Apartment 420 and Carspace 40, The Etage, 2-50 Pyrmont Bridge Road, Camperdown (the "Contract") between the appellant as vendor and the respondents as purchasers was and is valid. 4. Declare that the Contract was validly terminated by the appellant. 5. Order that Caveat registered No. 8684513 be withdrawn by the respondents. 6. Order that the respondents pay the appellant's costs of the proceedings and of this appeal but have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 in respect of the costs of the appeal if qualified.
JUDGMENT:
IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF APPEAL
CA 41012/02
SC 3128/02
SANTOW JA
TOBIAS JA
McCOLL JA
Thursday, 2 October 2003
STERLING ESTATES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PTY LIMITED v
Sam John MALOUF and Christine MALOUF
FACTS
The appellant as vendor and the respondents as purchasers entered into a Contract for the Construction and Sale of an apartment and car space at Camperdown (the "Contract"). The contract provided a procedure for notification by the purchaser of "Special Faults", which were to be repaired by the vendor prior to completion. "Special Fault" was defined in the Contract to mean:
"a fault or defect in the property which:
(a) is structural; or
(b) because of its nature requires urgent attention; or
(c) may cause danger to persons in the property; or
(d) makes the property uninhabitable."
On 14 March 2002, the first respondent, Mr Malouf, sent a letter (the "Special Faults letter") to the appellant identifying a defect said to require rectification prior to settlement, namely a rise in the concrete floor in the lounge room area. On 17 April, the appellant served a Notice to Complete on the respondents requiring completion on or before 3 May 2002. The respondents did not complete relying on the fact that the "Special Fault" had not been rectified. On 3 June 2002 the appellant served a Notice…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Sterling Estates Development Corporation Pty Ltd v Malouf and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2003] NSWCA 278
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was the construction of the "Special Faults" clause within the contract for sale. Specifically, the court had to determine whether the appellant's actions constituted a breach of this clause, thereby invalidating its subsequent notice of termination. The court also considered the validity of the termination notice itself and the implications for the caveat registered by the respondents.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, setting aside the declarations and orders made by the Chief Judge. The court found that the notice of termination dated 3 June 2002, served by the appellant on the respondents in respect of the Contract for the Sale of Land dated 14 February 2000, was valid. Consequently, the court declared that the contract had been validly terminated by the appellant and ordered that the caveat registered by the respondents be withdrawn. The respondents were ordered to pay the appellant's costs of the proceedings and the appeal, with a potential certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 for the appeal costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Appeal allowed. 2. Order that the declarations and orders made by Young CJ in Eq on 24 October 2002 be set aside. 3. Declare that the Notice of Termination dated 3 June 2002 served by the appellant on the respondents in respect of the Contract for the Sale of Land dated 14 February 2000 in relation to Part FI 1/874004 known as Apartment 420 and Carspace 40, The Etage, 2-50 Pyrmont Bridge Road, Camperdown (the "Contract") between the appellant as vendor and the respondents as purchasers was and is valid. 4. Declare that the Contract was validly terminated by the appellant. 5. Order that Caveat registered No. 8684513 be withdrawn by the respondents. 6. Order that the respondents pay the appellant's costs of the proceedings and of this appeal but have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 in respect of the costs of the appeal if qualified.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.