FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| STATE CENTRAL AUTHORITY & WESTON | [2010] FamCA 599 |
| FAMILY LAW – CHILD ABDUCTION – HAGUE CONVENTION – Habitual residence |
| APPLICANT: | State Central Authority |
| RESPONDENT: | Mr Weston |
| FILE NUMBER: | MLC | 658 | of | 2010 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 16 July 2010 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Melbourne |
| PLACE HEARD: | Melbourne |
| JUDGMENT OF: | BENNETT J |
| HEARING DATE: | 5 AND 8 JULY 2010 |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | MS J GREENHAM |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, LEGAL SERVICES BRANCH |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | MR A ROBINSON |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: | STYNES DIXON LAWYERS |
Orders
IT IS ORDERED:
That the application of the State Central Authority filed on 19 April 2010 be and is hereby dismissed.
That the passport of the child Z born … April 2008 currently held for safekeeping in this Registry of the Court be returned to the father Mr Weston.
That paragraphs 3, 4, 5, 6 of the Order made on 23 April 2010 be and are hereby discharged.
That the father’s application filed 25 January 2010 be referred to Registrar Mestrovic for fixing for interim hearing in the appropriate list.
IT IS REQUESTED that the Australia Federal Police remove the name of the child Z born … April 2008 from the Airport Watch List at all points of international arrivals and departures in Australia
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym State Central Authority & Weston is approved pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE |
FILE NUMBER: MLC 658 of 2010
| STATE CENTRAL AUTHORITY |
Applicant
And
| MR WESTON |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
By application filed 19 April 2010 the State Central Authority seeks the return to the United Kingdom of the child Z born in April 2008 (now 2 years) pursuant to r 16 of the Family Law (Child Abduction Convention) Regulations 1986 (‘the Regulations’). The Regulations import into Australian law the provisions of the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, which was concluded at The Hague on 25 October 1980 (‘the 1980 Convention’) and which entered into force between Australia and the United Kingdom since 1 January 1987.
The purpose of the 1980 Convention is to provide that children who are wrongfully removed to, or retained in, Australia are returned to the Convention country in which they were habitually resident immediately prior to the wrongful removal or retention. The purpose of return is to allow appropriate parenting arrangements to be made for a child within the legal and social framework of the country of his or her habitual residence.
The applicant in these proceedings is the State Central Authority (SCA). The SCA acts on the request of Ms Weston who is the child’s mother. She is 35 years old, and resides in London, United Kingdom. The respondent, Mr Weston, is the father of the child. He is 37 years old, residing with his parents in a suburb of Melbourne, Australia.
The SCA alleges that the mother agreed that the child…
Continue reading State Central Authority and Weston
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- State Central Authority and Weston [2010] FamCA 599
- Case
- [2010] FamCA 599
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before Bennett J were whether the State Central Authority's application for orders relating to the child's passport and international travel should be granted, and how Mr Weston's application should proceed. The court was required to determine the appropriate course of action regarding the child's passport and any existing travel restrictions.
Bennett J dismissed the application by the State Central Authority. The court ordered that the child Z's passport, held by the Registry, be returned to the father, Mr Weston. Furthermore, certain paragraphs of a previous order made on 23 April 2010 were discharged. Mr Weston's application filed on 25 January 2010 was referred to Registrar Mestrovic for an interim hearing. The court also requested that the Australian Federal Police remove the child's name from the Airport Watch List for all international arrivals and departures in Australia.
Orders
Orders of the court
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
That the application of the State Central Authority filed on 19 April 2010 be and is hereby dismissed.
2.
That the passport of the child Z born … April 2008 currently held for safekeeping in this Registry of the Court be returned to the father Mr Weston.
3.
That paragraphs 3, 4, 5, 6 of the Order made on 23 April 2010 be and are hereby discharged.
4.
That the father’s application filed 25 January 2010 be referred to Registrar Mestrovic for fixing for interim hearing in the appropriate list.
5.
IT IS REQUESTED that the Australia Federal Police remove the name of the child Z born … April 2008 from the Airport Watch List at all points of international arrivals and departures in Australia
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.