FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| SOMERS & SOMERS | [2014] FCCA 128 |
| Catchwords: CHILD SUPPORT – Child Support Agreement – Application for enforcement – where some payments already made – whether agreement is a binding child support agreement – where some amounts have been paid by the Respondent – whether interest should be payable. |
| Legislation: Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth), ss.80C, 80CA, 80E, 80F, 139, 151B, 80G |
| Somers & Somers [2013] FCCA 162 Somers & Somers (No.2) [2013] FCCA 1992 |
| Applicant: | MS SOMERS |
| Respondent: | MR SOMERS |
| File Number: | SYC 3026 of 2008 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Scarlett |
| Hearing date: | 11 November 2013 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 11 November 2013 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 28 January 2014 |
REPRESENTATION
| The Applicant: | In person |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | KDB Holmes |
ORDERS
The Respondent is to pay to the Applicant the sum of $7,256.00 by way of monies due under a Child Support Agreement entered into between the parties on 2 November 2011.
The Respondent is allowed one (1) month to pay.
Any Application for costs is to be made within twenty-eight (28) days.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Somers & Somers is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYC 3026 of 2008
| MS SOMERS |
Applicant
And
| MR SOMERS |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Application
This is an Application by the mother for enforcement of payments claimed to be due under a child support agreement entered into by the parties. An amount of $42,280.00 has already been paid by the Respondent father, who denies that any further amounts are outstanding.
Background
The history of litigation between the parties was set out in some detail in paragraphs [23] to [48] of an earlier decision, Somers & Somers[1].
[1] [2013] FCCA 162
In brief, the parties were married on (omitted) 1989. They separated on (omitted) 2004 and were divorced on 24 March 2006.
There are three children of the marriage:
a)X, born (omitted) 1993;
b)Y, born (omitted) 1996; and
c)Z, born (omitted) 1999.
X is now an adult.
The parties entered into a Child Support Agreement on 2 November 2005. The Agreement was registered with the Child Support Agency on 14 June 2006.
The Applicant commenced proceedings to enforce the Agreement on 12 March 2010 by filing an Enforcement Summons, seeking payment of an amount of arrears in the sum of $14,929.60 and continuing.
The Respondent filed an Application in a Case on 5 May 2010, seeking:
a)a declaration that the Child Support Agreement had been terminated;
b)orders enabling an accounting of monies overpaid by the Respondent to the applicant;
c)an order requiring the Applicant to repay to the Respondent the amount of the overpayment;
d)a stay of the Enforcement Summons; or
e)in the alternative, the dismissal of the Enforcement Summons.
On 3 May 2013, the Court declared:[2]
(1) The Court declares that the Child Support Agreement entered into by the Applicant and the Respondent on 2 November 2005…
Continue reading SOMERS & SOMERS
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Somers and Somers [2014] FCCA 128
- Case
- [2014] FCCA 128
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the Respondent was liable to pay the outstanding sum as stipulated in the Child Support Agreement.
The court found that the Respondent was indeed indebted to the Applicant under the terms of the agreement. Consequently, the Respondent was ordered to pay the sum of $7,256.00 within one month. Any application for costs was to be made within twenty-eight days of the order.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The Respondent is to pay to the Applicant the sum of $7,256.00 by way of monies due under a Child Support Agreement entered into between the parties on 2 November 2011.
2.
The Respondent is allowed one (1) month to pay.
3.
Any Application for costs is to be made within twenty-eight (28) days.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.