Smoje v Forrester

Case [2017] NSWCA 308


Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Smoje v Forrester [2017] NSWCA 308
Hearing dates:24 August 2017
Date of orders: 04 December 2017
Decision date: 04 December 2017
Before: Basten JA at [1];
Macfarlan JA at [2];
Meagher JA at [3]
Decision:

1. Appeal allowed.
2. Set aside orders 1, 2, 3 and 4 made on 30 May 2017 and in place thereof:
(a) dismiss the plaintiff’s summons;
(b) the defendant’s costs of the proceedings be paid out of the estate of the deceased (Miryana Smoje) on the indemnity basis.
3. Appellant’s costs of the appeal be paid out of the deceased’s estate on the indemnity basis.
4. The amount of $750,000 paid into court by the defendant be paid to the defendant’s solicitors or, if security was provided in lieu of that payment, that such security be delivered up to the defendant’s solicitors.

Catchwords:

SUCCESSION – family provision and maintenance – where deceased terminally ill and living in a hotel room – where respondent visited the deceased to provide her with care in the months preceding her death occasionally staying overnight – whether respondent and deceased were “living together” in a “close personal relationship” at the time of her death

  EVIDENCE – expert evidence – where primary judge made findings as to mental disability suffered by respondent – where no expert evidence as to existence of any such disability and how it might affect respondent’s behaviour or evidence – whether findings, including as to credibility, available
Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW), ss 57, 59
Cases Cited: Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22
Mitchell v Cullingral Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 389
Strinic v Singh (2009) 74 NSWLR 419; [2009] NSWCA 15
Waterways Authority v Fitzgibbon [2005] HCA 57; (2005) 79 ALJR 1816
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Neven Smoje (Appellant)
David Forrester (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:

 

M Painter SC and R Bianchi (Appellant)
I Coleman SC and L Clarke (Respondent)

 

Solicitors:

  Wills & Estates Legal Service (Appellant)
Turner Freeman (Respondent)
File Number(s):2017/191999
Publication restriction:None.
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Jurisdiction:
Equity
Citation:
[2017] NSWSC 482
Date of Decision:
4 May 2017
Before:
Lindsay J
File Number(s):
2015/00291238

Headnote

[This headnote is not to be read as part of the judgment]

In the months preceding her death, the deceased was living in a hotel room. She was terminally ill. The respondent, whilst residing in other accommodation, would visit her to provide care and support and occasionally spend the night sleeping on her floor. The primary judge (Lindsay J) found that the respondent was in a “close personal relationship” and “living together” with the deceased at the time of her death, and therefore eligible to make an application for provision out of the deceased’s estate. In doing so, his Honour viewed the respondent’s evidence in light of his asserted mental illness, which was not the subject of expert evidence. His Honour made…

Continue reading Smoje v Forrester

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Smoje v Forrester [2017] NSWCA 308
Case
[2017] NSWCA 308
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of *Smoje v Forrester* concerned an appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court of New South Wales regarding a family provision claim. The deceased, Miryana Smoje, was terminally ill and residing in a hotel room at the time of her death. The respondent, who had provided occasional care and overnight stays to the deceased in the months preceding her death, sought provision from the estate. The central dispute revolved around whether the respondent and the deceased were "living together" in a "close personal relationship" at the time of the deceased's death, as required for certain family provision entitlements.

The legal issues before the Court of Appeal included whether the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent and the deceased were living together in a close personal relationship. Additionally, the court considered whether the primary judge was entitled to make findings about a mental disability suffered by the respondent, including its impact on his behaviour and credibility, in the absence of any expert evidence to support such findings.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, setting aside the primary judge's orders. The court reasoned that the evidence did not support a finding that the respondent and the deceased were "living together" in the sense contemplated by the relevant legislation. The court also found that the primary judge had impermissibly made findings regarding the respondent's mental state and its effect on his credibility without the necessary expert evidence. Consequently, the plaintiff's summons was dismissed.

The orders made by the Court of Appeal included setting aside the primary judge's orders, dismissing the plaintiff's summons, and ordering that the defendant's costs of the proceedings and the appellant's costs of the appeal be paid out of the deceased's estate on an indemnity basis. The court also ordered the release of funds paid into court by the defendant.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Appeal allowed.

2. Set aside orders 1, 2, 3 and 4 made on 30 May 2017 and in place thereof:

(a) dismiss the plaintiff’s summons;

(b) the defendant’s costs of the proceedings be paid out of the estate of the deceased (Miryana Smoje) on the indemnity basis.

3. Appellant’s costs of the appeal be paid out of the deceased’s estate on the indemnity basis.

4. The amount of $750,000 paid into court by the defendant be paid to the defendant’s solicitors or, if security was provided in lieu of that payment, that such security be delivered up to the defendant’s solicitors.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.