FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sleep v Repatriation Commission [2009] FCA 1413
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – applications for extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal from the dismissal of two separate appeals from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – Veterans’ Entitlement Act 1986 (Cth) s 35 service pension is means tested – decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal and of the primary judge affirmed – applications for extension of time dismissed.
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44
Veterans’ Entitlement Act 1986 (Cth) ss 5Q, 5QA, 7, 12, 13, 14, 24, 35, 37, 37AA, 37N, 52, Schedule 6 Part 2
Federal Court of Australia Rules O 52 r 15(2)Sleep v Repatriation Commission [2008] AATA 1100 affirmed
Sleep v Repatriation Commission [2008] AATA 1101 affirmed
Sleep v Repatriation Commission [2009] FCA 472KENNETH JOHN SLEEP v REPATRIATION COMMISSION
SAD 131 of 2009
KENNETH JOHN SLEEP v REPATRIATION COMMISSION
SAD 164 of 2009
LANDER J
1 DECEMBER 2009
ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
SAD 131 OF 2009
BETWEEN: KENNETH JOHN SLEEP
ApplicantAND: REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
JUDGE:
LANDER J
DATE OF ORDER:
1 DECEMBER 2009
WHERE MADE:
ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The application for an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal is dismissed.
Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court’s website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
SAD 164 OF 2009
BETWEEN: KENNETH JOHN SLEEP
ApplicantAND: REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
JUDGE:
LANDER J
DATE OF ORDER:
1 DECEMBER 2009
WHERE MADE:
ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The application for an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal is dismissed.
Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court’s website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
SAD 131 OF 2009
SAD 164 OF 2009
BETWEEN: KENNETH JOHN SLEEP
ApplicantAND: REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
JUDGE:
LANDER J
DATE:
1 DECEMBER 2009
PLACE:
ADELAIDE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The applicant has brought two separate applications for extensions of time within which to appeal from orders of a judge of this Court dismissing two separate appeals from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) and ordering the applicant to pay the costs of those appeals: Sleep v Repatriation Commission [2009] FCA 472.
The applicant is a veteran who has rendered eligible war service within the meaning of s 7 of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) (the Act). As a result of that war service the applicant became incapacitated from a war caused injury or a war caused disease and became eligible for a pension by way of compensation which is to be paid in accordance with the Act: s 13.
Part…
Continue reading Sleep v Repatriation Commission
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Sleep v Repatriation Commission [2009] FCA 1413
- Case
- [2009] FCA 1413
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the circumstances surrounding the delay in filing the notice of appeal. Sleep argued that his delay was due to a combination of factors, including health issues, confusion regarding legal procedures, and reliance on advice from a legal representative. The court assessed the applicant's arguments and the evidence provided to determine whether the delay was sufficiently explained and whether it was in the interests of justice to grant the extension. The court concluded that while the applicant had presented some mitigating factors, they were not compelling enough to warrant an extension of time. The court found that Sleep had not demonstrated a satisfactory explanation for the delay, and therefore, the application for an extension was dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The application for an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal is dismissed.
Note:
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: LANDER J
Full text does not contain this section.