Shorland and Rich

Case [2018] FCCA 1928


FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SHORLAND & RICH [2018] FCCA 1928
Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – De Facto couple – Application for leave to institute property proceedings on the basis of hardship – section 44(6) – where the applicant is 9 months out of time – where the parties were in a de facto relationship for 8 years – where the respondent invites the Court to dismiss the application in accordance with the views expressed by the High Court in Stanford v Stanford – Costs.

Legislation:

Family Law Act 1975, ss.44, 117

Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 r.21.02

Cases cited:

Chancellor & McCoy [2013] FCCA 740
Chancellor & McCoy [2016] FamCAFC 256
Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 118 ALR 248
Fennessy & Gregorian [2009] FamCAFC 44; (2009) FLC 93-399
Jacenko & Jacenko [1986] FamCA 25
Kohan & Kohan (1993) FLC 92-340; (1992) 16 Fam LR 245

Sharp & Sharp [2011] FamCAFC 150

Slocomb & Hedgwood [2015] FamCAFC 219

Stanford v Stanford (2012) 247 CLR 108

Whitford& Whitford (1979) FLC 90-612

Yunghanns & Yunghanns (2000) FLC 93-029; (2000) 26 Fam LR 331

Applicant: MR SHORLAND
Respondent: MS RICH
File Number: SYC 4800 of 2016
Judgment of: Judge Monahan
Hearing date: 29 March 2018
Date of Last Submission: 29 March 2018
Delivered at: Sydney
Delivered on: 8 August 2018

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Schonell
Solicitors for the Applicant: Michael Conley Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Hodgson
Solicitors for the Respondent: Andrew Cohen Solicitor

ORDERS

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

  1. The Applicant have leave to institute proceedings under Part VIIIAB of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

  2. All extant applications be otherwise adjourned to this Court on 24 October 2018 at 9:30am for directions (“the directions hearing”).

  3. Any Application in a Case or Objection to Subpoena made returnable by the Registry from the date of these orders until the date of the directions hearing will not be heard on that date without the express leave of Judge Monahan, however directions in respect of that Application or Objection may be given.

  4. The Applicant make, file and serve any Further Amended Initiating Application, updated Financial Statement and supporting affidavit by no later than 4:00pm on 5 September 2018.

  5. The Respondent, make file and serve an Amended Response, Financial Statement and affidavit in support by no later than 4:00pm on 3 October 2018.

  6. The question of costs arising from this decision be reserved.

AND THE COURT NOTES THAT:

A.The directions hearing has been listed prior the commencement of final hearing listed that day.

B.The purpose of the directions hearing is to:

(i)     consider any joint balance sheet;

(ii)if appropriate, consider referring the matter to a Conciliation Conference or private mediation;

(iii)ascertain whether the parties press any costs application or whether such are not sought or whether such may be deferred for consideration at any final hearing; and

(iv)in the event the parties remain in dispute, ascertain the ambit of the dispute and make further directions.

IT IS NOTED that publication…

Continue reading Shorland and Rich

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Shorland and Rich [2018] FCCA 1928
Case
[2018] FCCA 1928
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Shorland and Rich, heard before Judge Monahan, the applicant sought leave to institute proceedings under Part VIIIAB of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). The specific nature of the dispute between the parties is not detailed in the provided text, but the application for leave suggests a preliminary procedural hurdle was being addressed.

The court was required to determine whether to grant the applicant leave to proceed with their case under the specified part of the *Family Law Act*. Additionally, the court needed to manage the ongoing procedural aspects of the litigation, including the filing and service of further documents by both parties and the scheduling of future court events.

Judge Monahan granted the applicant leave to institute proceedings. The court then adjourned all extant applications to a directions hearing scheduled for 24 October 2018. At this directions hearing, the court intended to consider various matters, including any joint balance sheet, potential referrals to conciliation or mediation, the status of any costs applications, and, if disputes remained, to ascertain the scope of the disagreement and issue further directions. The court also made specific orders regarding the timelines for the parties to file and serve amended applications, financial statements, and supporting affidavits. The question of costs arising from this decision was reserved.

Orders

Orders of the court

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.

The Applicant have leave to institute proceedings under Part VIIIAB of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

2.

All extant applications be otherwise adjourned to this Court on 24 October 2018 at 9:30am for directions (“the directions hearing”).

3.

Any Application in a Case or Objection to Subpoena made returnable by the Registry from the date of these orders until the date of the directions hearing will not be heard on that date without the express leave of Judge Monahan, however directions in respect of that Application or Objection may be given.

4.

The Applicant make, file and serve any Further Amended Initiating Application, updated Financial Statement and supporting affidavit by no later than 4:00pm on 5 September 2018.

5.

The Respondent, make file and serve an Amended Response, Financial Statement and affidavit in support by no later than 4:00pm on 3 October 2018.

6.

The question of costs arising from this decision be reserved.

AND THE COURT NOTES THAT:

A. The directions hearing has been listed prior the commencement of final hearing listed that day.

B. The purpose of the directions hearing is to:

(i) consider any joint balance sheet;

(ii) if appropriate, consider referring the matter to a Conciliation Conference or private mediation;

(iii) ascertain whether the parties press any costs application or whether such are not sought or whether such may be deferred for consideration at any final hearing; and

(iv) in the event the parties remain in dispute, ascertain the ambit of the dispute and make further directions.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.