Sharma v Kaur

Case [2023] NSWCATCD 14


Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Sharma v Kaur [2023] NSWCATCD 14
Hearing dates: 3 March 2023
Date of orders: 15 March 2023
Decision date: 15 March 2023
Jurisdiction:Consumer and Commercial Division
Before: G Blake AM SC, Senior Member
Decision:

(1)   The application for miscellaneous matters of Gurgit Singh and the first named respondent filed on 21 February 2023 is dismissed.

(2)   The time for the applicants to make an application for a warrant for possession of the premises is extended to 3 February 2023.

Catchwords:

LEASES AND TENANCIES — Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) — NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal — Jurisdiction and power –the Tribunal has jurisdiction to determine application for extension of time to issue warrant for possession

LEASES AND TENANCIES — Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) — Recovery of possession of premises – application for extension of time to issue warrant for possession – application granted

Legislation Cited:

Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 36, 51, Sch 4 cl 3

Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA), ss 85, 131, 196

Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW), ss 43, 87, 88, 119, 121

Cases Cited:

Attorney-General of NSW v Gatsby (2018) 99 NSWLR 1; [2018] NSWCA 254

Citta Hobart Pty Ltd v Cawthorn [2022] HCA 16; (2022) 96 ALJR 476

Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163; [1995] HCA 58

Kaur v Sharma [2022] NSWCATAP 336

Kaur v Sharma (No 2) [2022] NSWCATAP 360

McLean v Power [2013] NSWSC 193

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597; [2002] HCA 11

Singh v Tidball [2023] NSWSC 96

Smits v Loel [2014] FCA 1341

Smits v Loel (No 3) [2015] FCA 77

Wilson v Chan & Naylor Parramatta Pty Ltd (2020) 103 NSWLR 140; [2020] NSWCA 213

Texts Cited:

None cited

Category:Consequential orders
Parties: Umesh Sharma and Krishna Sharma (Applicants)
Kiranjit Kaur and Reva Kaur Mehroke (Respondents)
Representation:

Solicitors:
Neil Lawyers (Applicants)

G Singh (representative) (Respondents)
File Number(s): RT 22/15982
Publication restriction: Nil

REASONS FOR DECISION

Overview

  1. In these proceedings the applicants, Umesh Sharma (Mr Sharma) and Krishna Sharma (Mrs Sharma), who were the landlords (collectively referred to as Mr and Mrs Sharma or the landlords), seek an extension of time for their application for a warrant for possession under the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) (RT Act) against the respondents, Kiranjit Kaur (Ms Kaur) and Reva Kaur Mehroke (Ms Mehroke), who were the tenants, of premises at Kingswood (the premises) under a residential tenancy agreement between them (the residential tenancy agreement).

  2. I have decided to dismiss the application of Gurgit Singh (Mr Singh) and Ms Kaur that the proceedings be stayed and to extend the time for the landlords making an application for a warrant for possession of the premises.

The factual background

  1. Mr Singh is the husband of Ms Kaur and the father of Ms Mehroke.

  2. At all relevant times RCMO Pty Ltd trading as United Property Sales &…

Continue reading Sharma v Kaur

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Sharma v Kaur [2023] NSWCATCD 14
Case
[2023] NSWCATCD 14
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Sharma v Kaur, the primary issue was the application for an extension of time to issue a warrant for possession of residential premises under the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW). The case was heard and determined by the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT). The applicants sought an extension of time to issue a warrant for possession of the premises due to delays caused by factors outside their control.

The legal issues before the tribunal centred on the tribunal's jurisdiction to grant an extension of time under the Act and whether the applicants had provided sufficient justification for the delay. The applicants argued that unforeseen circumstances had impeded their ability to timely apply for the warrant, while the respondents contended that the delay was unreasonable and that the applicants had not demonstrated exceptional circumstances warranting an extension.

In rendering its decision, the tribunal noted the statutory provisions regarding the recovery of possession and the requirement for applications to be made within a specified timeframe. The tribunal examined the evidence and submissions provided by both parties, considering the nature and extent of the delay and the reasons provided for it. Ultimately, the tribunal found that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient justification for the delay and granted the application for an extension of time. The tribunal emphasised the importance of landlords adhering to the statutory timelines but recognised that exceptional circumstances may warrant an extension in certain cases.

The final orders of the tribunal dismissed the application for miscellaneous matters filed by the applicants and extended the time for the applicants to make an application for a warrant for possession to 3 February 2023. This outcome reflects the tribunal's balanced approach to the competing interests of landlords and tenants under the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW).

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) The application for miscellaneous matters of Gurgit Singh and the first named respondent filed on 21 February 2023 is dismissed.

(2) The time for the applicants to make an application for a warrant for possession of the premises is extended to 3 February 2023.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.