Sellers and Burns and Anor

Link copied
Case Copied 20 min read

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SELLERS & BURNS AND ANOR [2018] FamCA 93
FAMILY LAW – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Stay of proceedings – Where application for stay pending Leave to Appeal and Appeal to Full Court – Interim orders as to spouse maintenance and interim property – Consideration of applicable principles – Where the husband’s appeal lacks merit – Where the appeal would not be rendered nugatory if a stay is not granted – Stay granted on terms as to spouse maintenance – Stay refused as to interim property
Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) r 22.11
Burns & Sellers (No2) [2017] FamCA 914
Fauna Holding Pty Ltd & Ors & Mitchell [2000] FamCA 548
House v R [1936] HCA 40
Jackson & Balen [2009] FamCAFC 131
Strahan & Strahan [2009] FamCAFC 166
APPLICANT: Mr Sellers
FIRST RESPONDENT: Ms Burns
SECOND RESPONDENT: Mr Kirk
FILE NUMBER: PAC 5854 of 2016
DATE DELIVERED: 23 February 2018
PLACE DELIVERED: Parramatta
PLACE HEARD: Parramatta
JUDGMENT OF: Foster J
HEARING DATE: 23 January 2018

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Mr Batey
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: McAuley Hawach Lawyers
COUNSEL FOR THE FIRST RESPONDENT: Mr Schonell SC
SOLICITOR FOR THE FIRST RESPONDENT: Karras Partners Lawyers
SOLICITOR FOR THE SECOND RESPONDENT: Nicholas Eddy & Company

Orders

  1. That the interim order as to spouse maintenance made on 14 November 2017 be stayed pending determination of the husband’s Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal to the Full Court pursuant to Notice of Appeal filed 11 December 2017 provided that the husband pay to the wife by way of interim spouse maintenance the sum of $1,850.00 per week commencing 11 December 2017.

  2. That the husband’s Application for Stay of the interim property order made 14 November 2017 be dismissed.

  3. That costs of both parties of and incidental to the Application for Stay be reserved pending determination of the Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal to the Full Court.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Sellers& Burns and Anor has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PARRAMATTA

FILE NUMBER: PAC 5854  of 2016

Mr Sellers

Applicant

And

Ms Burns

First Respondent

And

Mr Kirk

Second Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. The application for determination is the Application in a Case filed by the husband on 20 December 2017 seeking orders as follows:

    a)that orders 1, 2(a), 2(b) and 2(c) of the orders dated 14 November 2017 be stayed pending the determination of the Appeal proceedings;

    b)that the wife pay the…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Sellers and Burns and Anor and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2018] FamCA 93
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Sellers and Burns and Anor*, Foster J considered an application for a stay of interim orders made in family law proceedings. The application concerned an interim order for spouse maintenance and an interim property order, both made on 14 November 2017. The husband sought to stay both of these orders pending the determination of his application for leave to appeal and his substantive appeal to the Full Court.

The primary legal issues before Foster J were whether to grant a stay of the interim spouse maintenance order and whether to grant a stay of the interim property order. The court was required to assess the merits of the husband's application for a stay in light of the relevant legal principles governing such applications in the context of family law appeals.

Foster J determined that a stay of the interim spouse maintenance order should be granted, but with a condition. The husband was ordered to pay $1,850.00 per week by way of interim spouse maintenance, commencing from 11 December 2017, pending the determination of his application for leave to appeal and appeal. However, the husband's application for a stay of the interim property order was dismissed. The costs of both parties in relation to the application for stay were reserved pending the outcome of the appeal proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That the interim order as to spouse maintenance made on 14 November 2017 be stayed pending determination of the husband’s Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal to the Full Court pursuant to Notice of Appeal filed 11 December 2017 provided that the husband pay to the wife by way of interim spouse maintenance the sum of $1,850.00 per week commencing 11 December 2017.

2.

That the husband’s Application for Stay of the interim property order made 14 November 2017 be dismissed.

3.

That costs of both parties of and incidental to the Application for Stay be reserved pending determination of the Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal to the Full Court.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.