Secretary, New South Wales Department of Family and Community Services by his delegate, Principal Officer, Barnardos Australia v MB and JW
Case
•
[2017] NSWSC 1087
•15 August 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Secretary, New South Wales Department of Family and Community Services by his delegate, Principal Officer, Barnardos Australia v MB and JW [2017] NSWSC 1087
[2017] NSWSC 1087
15 August 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In this case, the Secretary of the New South Wales Department of Family and Community Services sought to have two children adopted by prospective applicants. The natural parents of the children, MB and JW, opposed the adoption on the basis that it would be contrary to the best interests of the children. The court was required to determine whether the adoption would promote the welfare of the children, whether dispensing with the birth parents' consent was in the best interests of the children, and whether the best interests of the children would be promoted by making an adoption order and preferable to any other action that could be taken by law in relation to their care.
The court considered the welfare of the children to be paramount and found that the adoption by the proposed applicants would promote their welfare. The court also found that dispensing with the birth parents' consent was in the best interests of the children and that the adoption would be preferable to any other action that could be taken by law in relation to their care. The court considered the Paternal and Maternal Adoption Plans and found that they should be registered. The court also considered the proposed change of the children's surname and found that it was in the best interests of the children to change their surname to that of the proposed applicants.
The final orders made by the court were that the Paternal and Maternal Adoption Plans should be registered, the adoption orders should be made, and the children's surname should be changed to that of the proposed applicants. The court found that these orders were in the best interests of the children and would promote their welfare.
The court considered the welfare of the children to be paramount and found that the adoption by the proposed applicants would promote their welfare. The court also found that dispensing with the birth parents' consent was in the best interests of the children and that the adoption would be preferable to any other action that could be taken by law in relation to their care. The court considered the Paternal and Maternal Adoption Plans and found that they should be registered. The court also considered the proposed change of the children's surname and found that it was in the best interests of the children to change their surname to that of the proposed applicants.
The final orders made by the court were that the Paternal and Maternal Adoption Plans should be registered, the adoption orders should be made, and the children's surname should be changed to that of the proposed applicants. The court found that these orders were in the best interests of the children and would promote their welfare.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Adoption
-
Best Interests of the Child
-
Welfare of the Child
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
The Adoption of Angelo (a pseudonym) [2025] NSWSC 32
Cases Citing This Decision
48
The Adoption of Grace (a pseudonym)
[2025] NSWSC 1247
The Adoption of Matthew Bell
[2025] NSWSC 1242
The Adoption of Richard Henry Winter and Camilla-Alice Papen
[2025] NSWSC 1178
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
2