Scone Race Club Ltd v Cottom

Link copied
Case Copied 39 min read

Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

  • Summary available
Medium Neutral Citation: Scone Race Club Ltd v Cottom [2024] NSWCA 34
Hearing dates: 14 February 2024
Date of orders: 22 February 2024
Decision date: 22 February 2024
Before: Gleeson JA at [1];
Mitchelmore JA at [2];
Basten AJA at [3]
Decision:

(1)   Grant Scone Race Club Ltd leave to appeal from the judgment in the Common Law Division of 6 July 2023.

(2)   Allow the appeal and set aside orders 2 and 3, and the order as to costs, made in the Division.

(3)   Dismiss Mr Cottom’s second amended summons filed 2 November 2022.

(4)   Order that Mr Cottom pay the costs of Scone Race Club Ltd in the Division and on appeal.

Catchwords:

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – jurisdictional error – extent of functions and powers of tribunal – Personal Injury Commission medical appeal panel – whether appropriate consideration given to late documents – no opportunity given to address panel regarding late documents – whether late documents could materially affect decision

WORKERS COMPENSATION – medical dispute – extent of whole person impairment – appeal from certificate of medical assessor – scope of functions and powers of medical appeal panel – panel restricted to determining appeal on indicated grounds of appeal – panel restricted to reviewing injury the subject of referral to the medical assessor

Legislation Cited:

Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69

Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), s 66A

Workplace Injury Management and Workers’ Compensation Act 1998 (NSW), Ch 7, Pt 7, ss 319, 321, 322, 322A, 325, 326, 327, 328

Cases Cited:

Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26; 77 ALJR 1088

Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22

GLJ v The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Lismore [2023] HCA 32

House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40

Nathanson v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] HCA 26; 96 ALJR 737

Queanbeyan Racing Club Ltd v Burton [2021] NSWCA 304

Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Miah (2001) 206 CLR 57; [2001] HCA 22

Scone Race Club Ltd v Cottom [2019] NSWCA 260

Siddik v WorkCover Authority of NSW [2008] NSWCA 116; (2008) 6 DDCR 228

Skates v Hills Industries Ltd [2021] NSWCA 142

Sleiman v Gadalla Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 236

Warren v Coombes (1979) 142 CLR 531; [1979] HCA 9

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Scone Race Club Ltd (Applicant)
Gregory James Cottom (First Respondent)
Paul Sweeney, Drew Dixon and Michael Davies as a Medical Appeal Panel constituted under s 328 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (NSW) (Second Respondent)
President, Personal Injury Commission (Third Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr C Jackson (Applicant)
Mr C Hart (First Respondent)

Solicitors:
HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Applicant)
Bale Boshev Lawyers (First Respondent)
Crown Solicitor’s Office (Second and Third Respondents)
File Number(s): 2023/00232441
Publication restriction: N/A
 Decision under appeal 
Court or…
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Scone Race Club Ltd v Cottom and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2024] NSWCA 34
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Scone Race Club Ltd sought leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales against a decision of the Common Law Division. The dispute concerned the extent of Mr Cottom's whole person impairment for the purposes of workers' compensation. The Personal Injury Commission (PIC) medical appeal panel had considered late-filed documents in determining the appeal from a certificate of a medical assessor, without affording Mr Cottom an opportunity to address the panel regarding these documents.

The central legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the PIC medical appeal panel had committed a jurisdictional error by considering late documents without providing an opportunity for submissions, and whether those documents could have materially affected the panel's decision. The court also considered the scope of the medical appeal panel's functions and powers, specifically whether it was restricted to determining the appeal on the indicated grounds and reviewing only the injury the subject of the referral to the medical assessor.

The Court of Appeal reasoned that the PIC medical appeal panel had erred by failing to provide Mr Cottom with an opportunity to make submissions on the late documents, which were capable of materially affecting the outcome. The court held that this failure constituted a jurisdictional error. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the orders of the Common Law Division were set aside, and Mr Cottom's summons was dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) Grant Scone Race Club Ltd leave to appeal from the judgment in the Common Law Division of 6 July 2023.

(2) Allow the appeal and set aside orders 2 and 3, and the order as to costs, made in the Division.

(3) Dismiss Mr Cottom’s second amended summons filed 2 November 2022.

(4) Order that Mr Cottom pay the costs of Scone Race Club Ltd in the Division and on appeal.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.