Sayed v Justice Michael Hugh O'bryan & Ors
[2023] HCASL 170
SAYED
v
JUSTICE MICHAEL HUGH O'BRYAN & ORS
[2023] HCASL 170
M44/2023
The applicant seeks leave to appeal from a decision of a single Justice of the High Court of Australia (Steward J) refusing the applicant's application for a constitutional or other writ. By that application, the applicant sought to quash an order made by the Federal Court of Australia (O'Bryan J) dismissing the applicant's application that the primary judge recuse himself and that a writ of prohibition issue preventing the primary judge from determining the applicant's pending proceeding in the Federal Court.
The application does not disclose any arguable error in Steward J's decision and does not raise any question of law of general importance. Accordingly, leave should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
J.J. Edelman J.S. Gleeson 9 November 2023
2
0
0