DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: Santosa v Guerin [2007] QDC 335 PARTIES: Handojo Santosa
(Appellant)
v
Scott Guerin
(Respondent)FILE NO: 99 of 2007 PROCEEDING: Appeal from Magistrates Court DELIVERED ON: 10 December 2007 DELIVERED AT: Southport HEARING DATE: 20 November 2007 followed by written submissions JUDGE: C.F. Wall Q.C. ORDER: Appeal allowed with costs, complaint dismissed with costs. CATCHWORDS: APPEAL – INFERIOR COURTS – TRAFFIC – appellant convicted of driving without a driver licence and whilst disqualified – previously disqualified by a Queensland court for holding or obtaining a driver licence – appellant held a valid Indonesian driver licence which by Queensland legislation authorised him to drive in Queensland – whether previous disqualification applied to Indonesian driver licence and authorisation, by reason of that licence, to drive in Queensland – jurisdiction of Queensland court over foreign driver licence.
APPEAL – INFERIOR COURTS – COSTS – on successful appeal and in Magistrates Court following dismissal of complaint (on appeal) – difficult, complex and important matter – quantum of costs.
Cases referred to (on costs)
Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534, FAA
Hodgens v Williams [2005] QDC 371, FAA
Williams v Rex and Anor,(No. 2) [2007] QDC 309, DIST
Durrant v Gardner [2000] QDC 198, FAALegislation referred to:
Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, ss 78(1), 79(2), 86(2)(f), 127(2)(b), definitions of “non-Queensland driver licence”, “foreign driver licence”, “Queensland driver licence”, “driver licence”, “licence”, “permit”, “transport Act”, “disqualified driver”.
Transport Operations (Road Use Management – Driver Licensing) Regulation 1999, ss. 26, 35
Penalties and Sentences Act, s. 187
Justices Act, ss. 158A, 158B, 232ACOUNSEL K. Flemming QC and R.D. Green for Appellant
M. Whitbread for RespondentSOLICITORS: Appellant – Thynne & Macartney
Respondent –Office of the Queensland Police Service Solicitor
HIS HONOUR: This is an appeal against the appellant's conviction by an Acting Magistrate in the Magistrates Court at Southport on the 2nd February 2007 of driving a motor vehicle without a driver licence and whilst disqualified by a Court from holding or obtaining a driver licence. The offence was alleged to have been committed on the 29th June 2006.
On the 11th April 2006 in the same Court the appellant was convicted of a drink-driving offence and it was ordered that he be disqualified from holding or obtaining a driver licence for three months. This was the disqualification relied on for the offence subject of the appeal. Both are offences against the provisions of the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995 - TORUM. The offence the appellant was convicted of is found in section 78(1) of TORUM. That provides:
"78 Driving a motor vehicle without a driver licence
prohibited.
A person must not drive a motor vehicle on a road unless the person holds a driver licence authorising the person to drive the vehicle on the road.
Maximum penalty -
(a) if the person committed the offence while the person was disqualified, by any Court order, from holding or obtaining a…
Continue reading Santosa v Guerin
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Santosa v Guerin [2007] QDC 335
- Case
- [2007] QDC 335
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to decide whether the Queensland court’s disqualification applied to Santosa’s Indonesian driver’s licence. The court was also required to determine whether the Queensland court had jurisdiction to disqualify Santosa from holding or obtaining a driver’s licence, and to determine the quantum of costs, if any, to be awarded to Santosa.
The appeal was allowed. The court held that the Queensland court’s disqualification did not apply to Santosa’s Indonesian driver’s licence. The court found that the Queensland court did not have jurisdiction to disqualify Santosa from holding or obtaining a driver’s licence. The court held that the matter was difficult, complex and important and awarded Santosa costs. The complaint was dismissed with costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
Appeal allowed with costs, complaint dismissed with costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.