Legal Research
Cases
Saluwadana v Optus Administration Pty Ltd

Saluwadana v Optus Administration Pty Ltd

Case [2022] VMC 2

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Saluwadana v Optus Administration Pty Ltd [2022] VMC 2
Case: [2022] VMC 2
Decision Date: 27 January 2022

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Saluwadana v Optus Administration Pty Ltd [2022] VMC 2

Most Recent Citation

Optus Administration Pty Ltd v Saluwadana [2023] VSC 243

Cases Citing This Decision

Optus Administration Pty Ltd v Saluwadana [2023] VSC 243
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…gistrate Foster gave leave to amend the charges, for reasons that were published on 27 January 2022.[1] [1] Saluwadana v Optus Administration Pty Ltd [2022] VMC 2 ( Reasons ).…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Sydney Seaplanes Pty Ltd v Page [2021] NSWCA 204
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…interpretation may thus be seen as a holistic one or as one involving something akin to hermeneutic reasoning.[3] [3] Sydney Seaplanes Pty Ltd v Page [2021] NSWCA 204; 393 ALR 485 [31].…
Director of Public Prosecutions Reference No 1 of 2019 [2021] HCA 26
Citation 2 (Para 1)

…dered the re-enactment presumption in Director of Public Prosecutions Reference No 1 of 2019 [18] on appeal from the Court of Appeal in Victoria. [18](2021) 95 ALJR 741.…
SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34
Citation 3 (Para 1)

…ion of its text whilst at the same time, regard must be had to its context and purpose.[2] [2] SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34, 262 CLR 362 per Kiefel CJ, Nettle and Gordon JJ).…
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Kumar [2017] HCA 11
Citation 4 (Para 1)

…ntion is indicated. It is here useful to recount the High Court authority in Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Kumar [24]: [24][2017] HCA 11.…
Sutton (a pseudonym) v The Queen [2015] VSCA 251
Citation 5 (Para 1)

…The concept of an injustice to an accused was considered in Sutton (a Pseudonym) v R [2015] VSCA 251 ( Sutton ).…
Georgopoulos v Silaforts Painting Pty Ltd [2012] VSCA 179
Citation 6

…[13] Georgopoulos v Silaforts Painting Pty Ltd (2012) 37 VR 232, 243 [40]; [2012] VSCA 179 (Osborn JA, J Forrest and Beach AJJA).…
Williams v Oataway [2005] VSCA 137
Citation 7

…[15][2005] VSCA 137.…
Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 53
Citation 8 (Para 1)

…the text used and its context, as explained by McHugh, Gummow, Kirby and Hayne JJ in Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority .[1] [1](1998) 194 CLR 355 at [69]-[71] (‘ Project Blue Sky’ ).…
CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd [1997] HCA 2
Citation 9

…[4][1997] HCA 2.…
Re Alcan Australia Ltd; Ex parte Federation of Industrial, Manufacturing and Engineering Employees [1994] HCA 34
Citation 10

…[14] Re Alcan Australia; Ex parte Federation of Industrial, Manufacturing and Engineering Employees ( 1994) 181 CLR 96, 106 (Mason CJ, Brennan, Deane, Dawson, Toohey, Gaudron and McHugh JJ) (citations omitted).…
Ross v The Queen [1979] HCA 29
Citation 11 (Para 1)

…instrument must be construed on the prima facie basis that its provisions are intended to give effect to harmonious goals.[11] [11] Ross v The Queen (1979) 141 CLR 432 at 440 per Gibbs J.…
Bant v Grant [2021] VSC 276
Citation 12 (Para 1)

…In Bant v Grant [2021] VSC 276 ( Bant ), the Supreme Court considered whether an amendment would have the effect of charging a new offence. The Court found that, in order to determine whether an amendment would have the effect of charging a new offence, it is first necessary to identify the 'essential factual ing…
Joseph v Worthington [2017] VSC 501
Citation 13 (Para 1)

…In Joseph v Worthington & Anor [2017] VSC 501 the Court of Appeal concluded that the plain words of s 72(2) of the 1992 Act imposed an obligation to pay the long service leave entitlement ‘on that day’, being the day upon which the obligation accrued per s 72(1). As such it was a ‘specific offence’ rather than a…

AI Chat coming soon