SafeWork NSW v Stitt

Case [2024] NSWDC 255


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: SafeWork NSW v Stitt [2024] NSWDC 255
Hearing dates: 11-13, 15, 18-20 March 2024; 30 May 2024
Date of orders: 28 June 2024
Decision date: 28 June 2024
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Scotting DCJ
Decision:

(1)   I find the defendant guilty of the s 32 offence.

(2)   The matter will be listed for sentence on a date convenient to the parties.

Catchwords: CRIME – prosecution – work health and safety – duty of persons undertaking business – duty of employer – risk of death or serious injury – death of worker
Legislation Cited:

Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000

Work Health and Safety Act 2011

Work Health and Safety Regulation 2017

Cases Cited:

Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd v R (2012) 246 CLR 92

Bulga Underground Operations v Nash [2016] NSWCCA 37

Carrington Slipways Pty Ltd v Callaghan (1985) 11 IR 467

Collins v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1986) 5 NSWLR 209

Director of Public Prosecutions v JCS Fabrications Pty Ltd and JMAL Group Pty Ltd [2019] VSCA 50

Director of Public Prosecutions v Vibro-Pile (Aust) Pty Ltd (2016) 49 VR 676

Dunlop Rubber Australia Ltd v Buckley (1952) 87 CLR 313

Genner Constructions Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [2001] NSWIRComm 267

Grasso Consulting Engineers Pty Ltd v SafeWork NSW [2021] NSWCCA 288

Inspector Ching v Bros Bins Systems Pty Ltd [2004] NSWIRComm 197

Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales (2010) 239 CLR 531

Laing O’Rourke (BMC) Pty Ltd v Kirwin [2011] WASCA 117

Laing O’Rourke (BMC) Pty Ltd v Kirwin [2011] WASCA 117

R v Board of Trustees of the Science Museum [1993] 1 WLR 1171

R v Commercial Industrial Construction Group Pty Ltd (2006) 14 VR 321

R v Nelson Group Services (Maintenance) Ltd [1998] 4 All ER 332

Royall v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 378

Simpson Design and Associates Pty Ltd v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2011] NSWCA 316

Slivak v Lurgi(Aust) Pty Ltd (2001) 205 CLR 304

Smith v Broken Hill Pty Ltd (1957) 97 CLR 337

Tangerine Confectionery Ltd and Veolia ES (UK) Ltd v R [2011] EWCA Crim 2015

Thiess Pty Ltd v Industrial Court of New South Wales (2010) 78 NSWLR 94

WorkCover Authority of New South Wales v Kellogg (Aust) Pty Ltd [1999] NSWIRComm 453

WorkCover Authority of New South Wales v Kirk Group Holdings Pty Ltd (2004) 135 IR 166

WorkCover Authority of NSW v Atco Controls Pty Ltd (1998) 82 IR 80

Texts Cited:

2011 WorkCover NSW Guide to Erecting, Altering and Dismantling Scaffolds Part 2

Scaffolding Part 3: Prefabricated and tube-and-coupler scaffolding AS 1576.3:2015

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: SafeWork NSW (Prosecutor)
Jason Stitt (Defendant)
Representation:

Counsel:
C Magee (Prosecutor)
M Baroni (Defendant)

Solicitors:
Legal, Department of Customer Service (Prosecutor)
Barry Nilsson Lawyers (Defendant)
File Number(s): 2021/256592
Publication restriction: None

Judgment

Introduction

  1. Jason Reid Stitt (the defendant) has pleaded not guilty to a charge that as a person who had a…

Continue reading SafeWork NSW v Stitt

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
SafeWork NSW v Stitt [2024] NSWDC 255
Case
[2024] NSWDC 255
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of SafeWork NSW v Stitt involved the prosecution of Stitt, a person undertaking a business, for an offence under section 32 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW). The dispute arose from an incident where a worker was killed, leading to a charge against Stitt for failing to ensure the health and safety of workers, thereby creating an unreasonable risk of death or serious injury. The matter was heard in the Downing Centre Local Court, presided over by Magistrate Sullivan.

The court was tasked with determining whether Stitt had contravened the statutory duty under section 32 of the Act. Specifically, it had to consider whether Stitt, as a person undertaking a business or undertaking, had a sufficient duty of care to prevent the risk of death or serious injury to workers. This involved assessing the adequacy of the measures Stitt had in place to ensure a safe working environment, and whether the failure to prevent the incident constituted a breach of the statutory duty.

Magistrate Sullivan concluded that Stitt had indeed failed in his duty, finding him guilty of the section 32 offence. The court reasoned that Stitt had not implemented adequate risk management strategies and failed to ensure that the necessary precautions were in place to prevent the occurrence of the fatal incident. The court found that Stitt's actions or inactions created an unreasonable risk which led directly to the worker's death. The matter was adjourned for sentencing to allow for the parties to agree on a date.

The orders made by the court were that Stitt was found guilty of the section 32 offence. The court scheduled the matter for sentencing on a date to be determined by the parties. This outcome underscores the importance of adhering to statutory duties under the Work Health and Safety Act and the potential consequences of failing to ensure a safe working environment.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) I find the defendant guilty of the s 32 offence.

(2) The matter will be listed for sentence on a date convenient to the parties.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.