SafeWork NSW v Plasser Australia Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 33 min read

District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: SafeWork NSW v Plasser Australia Pty Ltd [2021] NSWDC 441
Hearing dates: 16 August 2021
Date of orders: 27 August 2021
Decision date: 27 August 2021
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Russell SC DCJ
Decision:

(1)   Plasser Australia Pty Ltd is convicted.

(2)   The appropriate fine is $240,000 but that will be reduced by 25% to reflect the plea of guilty.

(3)   Order Plasser Australia Pty Ltd to pay a fine of $180,000.

(4) Order pursuant to Section 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW) that 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor.

(5)   Order Plasser Australia Pty Ltd to pay the prosecutor’s costs.

Catchwords:

CRIMINAL LAW – prosecution – work health and safety – duty of persons undertaking business – risk of death or serious injury

SENTENCE – objective seriousness – mitigating factors – aggravating factors – plea of guilty – general deterrence – specific deterrence – capacity to pay appropriate penalty

COSTS – prosecution costs

OTHER – workers were engaged in oxy-propane cutting of waste solvent drums – top joint of the drum failed and explosive release caused the detachment of the drum lid – failure to undertake a risk assessment on the risks associated with the “de-heading” of waste drums – inadequate safe work procedures – training gaps

Legislation Cited:

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 21A, 22

Fines Act 1996 (NSW), ss 6, 122

Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW), ss 3, 7, 19, 32

Cases Cited:

Baumer v R [1988] HCA 67; (1988) 166 CLR 51

Bulga Underground Operations Pty Limited v Nash [2016] NSWCCA 37; (2016) 93 NSWLR 338

BW v R [2011] NSWCCA 176

Capral Aluminium Limited v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [2000] NSWIRComm 71; (2000) 49 NSWLR 610

Inspector Marie Davidson v Plasser Australia Pty Ltd [2009] NSWIRComm 79

Mahdi Jahandideh v The Queen [2014] NSWCCA 178

Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120

Nash v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Limited; Attorney General for NSW v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Limited [2017] NSWCCA 96

R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; (2006) 66 NSWLR 566

R v Wilkinson (No. 5) [2009] NSWSC 432

Unity Pty Limited v SafeWork NSW [2018] NSWCCA 266

Veen v The Queen (No. 2) [1988] HCA 14; (1988) 164 CLR 465

Texts Cited:

Code of Conduct: Managing risks of hazardous chemicals in the workplace – July 2014

Category:Sentence
Parties: SafeWork NSW (Prosecutor)
Plasser Australia Pty Limited (Defendant)
Representation:

Counsel:
M Cahill (Prosecutor)
E James (Defendant)

Solicitors:
SafeWork NSW (Prosecutor)
Gilchrist Connell (Defendant)
File Number(s): 2021/065575

Judgment

  1. On 13 March 2019 untrained workers employed by Plasser Australia Pty Ltd (“Plasser”) were using oxy-propane cutting equipment to de-head a 200-litre waste solvent drum. An explosion occurred causing the lid of the drum to strike one of the workers in his right leg.

  2. Plasser has pleaded guilty to an offence that as a person…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read SafeWork NSW v Plasser Australia Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2021] NSWDC 441
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

SafeWork NSW initiated proceedings against Plasser Australia Pty Ltd in the Local Court of New South Wales, alleging breaches of work health and safety laws that resulted in significant risk to employees. The workers were involved in the oxy-propane cutting of waste solvent drums when a failure in the top joint of one of the drums caused an explosive release, detaching the lid. This incident highlighted the absence of a risk assessment for the "de-heading" of the waste drums and deficiencies in the safe work procedures and employee training.

The court had to determine the objective seriousness of the offences, considering the mitigating and aggravating factors, as well as the impact of the company's plea of guilty. The prosecution argued that the risk to the employees’ lives was severe, and the company's failure to conduct a risk assessment and implement proper procedures exacerbated the situation. The defence presented mitigating factors, including the company's cooperation and the absence of previous convictions.

The court found the breaches to be of significant objective seriousness due to the potential for death or serious injury. However, it reduced the penalty by 25% to reflect the company's guilty plea. The court ordered a fine of $180,000, with 50% to be paid to the prosecutor, and mandated that the company pay the prosecution's costs. The decision underscored the importance of risk assessments and proper safety procedures in preventing workplace accidents.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) Plasser Australia Pty Ltd is convicted.

(2) The appropriate fine is $240,000 but that will be reduced by 25% to reflect the plea of guilty.

(3) Order Plasser Australia Pty Ltd to pay a fine of $180,000.

(4) Order pursuant to Section 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW) that 50% of the fine is to be paid to the prosecutor.

(5) Order Plasser Australia Pty Ltd to pay the prosecutor’s costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.