District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: SafeWork NSW v HD Projects Pty Ltd [2021] NSWDC 126 Hearing dates: 15 April 2021 Date of orders: 16 April 2021 Decision date: 16 April 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Scotting DCJ Decision: 1 HD Projects Pty Ltd is convicted.
2 I impose a fine of $170,000.
3 The defendant is to pay the prosecutor’s costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed. The defendant entered a plea of not guilty at an early stage of the proceedings. A number of adjournments were sought by the prosecutor to accommodate delays in the related proceedings against AC. The parties, and if necessary a costs assessor, should reflect these circumstances in arriving at the appropriate quantum of costs.
4 I order pursuant to s 122(2) Fines Act 1996 that 50% of the fine is paid to the prosecutor.
Catchwords: CRIME – prosecution – work health and safety – duty of persons undertaking business – duty of employers – risk of death or serious injury – workers injured
SENTENCING – deterrence – aggravating factors – mitigating factors – good prospects of rehabilitation – remorse - parity
Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Work Health and Safety Act 2011
Cases Cited: Bulga Underground Operations Pty Ltd v Nash [2016] NSWCCA 37
Green v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462
R v Thangavelautham [2016] NSWCCA 141
Category: Sentence Parties: SafeWork NSW (Prosecutor)
H D Projects Pty Ltd (Defendant)Representation: Counsel: M Moir (Prosecutor)
Solicitors: Legal, Department of Customer Service
M Baroni (Defendant)
(Prosecutor)
Leigh Virtue & Associates (Defendant)
File Number(s): 2019/391940 Publication restriction: None
Judgment
Introduction
-
HD Projects Pty Ltd (the defendant) appears for sentence after it was found guilty after trial of an offence contrary to s 32 Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (the Act).
-
The Court’s reasons for the finding of guilt are set out in its decision SafeWork NSW v HD Projects Pty Ltd [2020] NSWDC 765 (the verdict judgment).
-
The maximum penalty for the offence is a fine of $1.5 million.
Facts
-
The following relevant matters are extracted from the verdict judgment. [1]
1. For contextual purpose, to the extent that there is any inconsistency or omissions in this judgment, the findings made in the verdict judgment prevail.
-
The defendant was contracted by Arise Constructions Pty Ltd (Arise) to install AFS Logicwall panels (panels) at a building site in Kellyville (the site). The panels were being lifted by a mobile crane operated by another contracted entity, All Cranes 4 Hire Pty Ltd (AC).
-
On 15 December 2017, a pack of panels were attached onto a Pallet Hook and loaded onto the crane by Marc Dessens, a labour hire employee that had been engaged by the defendant. Mr Dessens was not a qualified dogman. As the panels were lifted, the bottom panel broke through the plastic wrapping and fell. The 76kg panel injured two contracted workers on…
Continue reading SafeWork NSW v HD Projects Pty Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- SafeWork NSW v HD Projects Pty Ltd [2021] NSWDC 126
- Case
- [2021] NSWDC 126
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that HD Projects Pty Ltd had indeed failed in its duty to ensure the safety of its workers, resulting in their injuries. The court noted several aggravating factors, including the severity of the injuries and the preventable nature of the incident. However, the court also recognised mitigating factors such as the company’s cooperation during the proceedings and its commitment to improving workplace safety standards. The court emphasised the importance of deterrence and ensuring that similar incidents do not recur in the future. The court ultimately imposed a fine of $170,000 on HD Projects Pty Ltd and ordered the company to pay the prosecutor's costs of the proceedings. The court also ordered that 50% of the fine be paid to the prosecutor under the Fines Act 1996. The decision reflects the court's balanced approach, taking into account both the seriousness of the breach and the mitigating factors presented by HD Projects Pty Ltd.
Orders
Orders of the court
1 HD Projects Pty Ltd is convicted.
2 I impose a fine of $170,000.
3 The defendant is to pay the prosecutor’s costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed. The defendant entered a plea of not guilty at an early stage of the proceedings. A number of adjournments were sought by the prosecutor to accommodate delays in the related proceedings against AC. The parties, and if necessary a costs assessor, should reflect these circumstances in arriving at the appropriate quantum of costs.
4 I order pursuant to s 122(2) Fines Act 1996 that 50% of the fine is paid to the prosecutor.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.