DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Sabidussi v Young & Anor [2017] QDC 146
PARTIES:
ANITA MAREE SABIDUSSI
(plaintiff)
v
BRADLEY ALEXANDER YOUNG
(first defendant)
and
RACQ INSURANCE LIMITED (ABN 500 097 041 52)
(second defendant)
FILE NO/S:
BD 3921/2015
PROCEEDING:
Trial
ORIGINATING COURT:
District Court at Brisbane
DELIVERED ON:
9 June 2017
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
10 and 11 May 2017
JUDGE:
Rafter SC DCJ
ORDER:
Judgment that the second defendant pay the plaintiff $185,821.05.
CATCHWORDS:
DAMAGES – Personal injuries – Quantum – Where the plaintiff was injured in a motor vehicle accident – Liability admitted - Where dispute as to the nature and extent of the injuries caused by the motor vehicle accident – Whether the plaintiff has suffered a loss of earning capacity by reason of the injuries - Dispute as to various heads of damages, including past economic loss and future economic loss
Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld), s 51, s 55, s 59, s 60, s 61, s 62
Civil Liability Regulation 2014 (Qld)Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v McCarthy [2012] QCA 312, cited
Graham v Baker (1961) 106 CLR 34, cited
Guirguis Pty Ltd & Anor v Michel’s Patisserie System Pty Ltd & Ors [2017] QCA 83, cited
Onassis and Calogeropoulos v Vergottis [1968] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 403, cited
Shaw v Menzies & Anor [2011] QCA 197, cited
Withyman v State of New South Wales [2013] NSWCA 10, citedCOUNSEL:
AC Canceri for the plaintiff
JE FitzGerald for the defendant
SOLICITORS:
CMC Lawyers for the plaintiff
Cooper Grace Ward for the defendant
Introduction
On 1 December 2013, the plaintiff was a front seat passenger in a vehicle driven by her friend, Lynette Raines. They were travelling north along David Low Way at Sunrise Beach. The first defendant was driving in a southerly direction along David Low Way. His vehicle suddenly veered to the right and crossed over the raised median strip and into the path of the vehicle driven by Ms Raines. Ms Raines was taken by helicopter to the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital. She later died as a result of her injuries. The plaintiff was trapped in the vehicle. The Queensland Fire and Rescue Service cut her out of the car and she was taken by ambulance to the Nambour General Hospital.
By this proceeding the plaintiff claims damages for the injuries she suffered as a result. Liability is admitted. With the exception of special damages, all aspects of the plaintiff’s claim are in issue.
The issues
The parties are agreed that the plaintiff suffered a major depressive disorder, a soft tissue injury to the lumbar spine and an injury to the right knee.[1]
[1]Exhibit 1, para 5.
The issues to be determined include the nature and extent of those injuries and whether the plaintiff also sustained an injury to her left knee.
The plaintiff’s background
The plaintiff was born in 1977. She was 36 years of age at the time of the accident. She is 39…
Continue reading Sabidussi v Young
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Sabidussi v Young [2017] QDC 146
- Case
- [2017] QDC 146
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues revolved around the nature and extent of the injuries sustained by Sabidussi, specifically whether these injuries had indeed caused a loss of earning capacity. Additionally, the court needed to determine the appropriate compensation for past economic loss and future economic loss, considering the evidence presented by both parties.
The court meticulously reviewed the medical evidence and expert opinions provided. It found that Sabidussi had suffered a genuine loss of earning capacity due to the injuries sustained in the accident. The court assessed the credibility and weight of the evidence, particularly focusing on the impact of the injuries on Sabidussi’s ability to work. After considering all the submissions, the court concluded that the total amount of $185,821.05 was appropriate to compensate Sabidussi for the damages claimed.
The final orders were that the second defendant, Young, pay Sabidussi $185,821.05 to cover the established damages.
Orders
Orders of the court
Judgment that the second defendant pay the plaintiff $185,821.05.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.