FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| RODDA v CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR & ANOR | [2020] FCCA 2472 |
| Catchwords: CHILD SUPPORT – Judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – numerous grounds of review advanced – no reviewable legal error. |
| Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), ss.33, 44 Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth), ss.98C, 117 Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 (Cth), ss.110B, 111 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s.163 |
| Applicant: | RODDA |
| First Respondent: | CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR |
| Second Respondent | TASH |
| File Number: | PEG 16 of 2020 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Driver |
| Hearing date: | 3 September 2020 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 25 September 2020 |
REPRESENTATION
The Applicant appeared in person by videoconference
| Solicitors for the First Respondent: | Mr S Cummings of Sparke Helmore by videoconference |
The Second Respondent appeared in person by videoconference
ORDERS
The applicant’s Amended Notice of Appeal (Child Support) lodged on 28 April 2020 and filed on 14 May 2020 is dismissed.
The second respondent’s Notice of Cross-Appeal (Child Support) lodged on 2 June 2020 and filed on 4 June 2020 is dismissed.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Rodda v Child Support Registrar & Anor is approved pursuant to s.110X(4)(h) of the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 (Cth).
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PERTH |
PEG 16 of 2020
| RODDA |
Applicant
And
| CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR |
First Respondent
| TASH |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
By a Notice of Appeal (Child Support) filed on 15 January 2020 and amended on 28 April 2020 (Notice of Appeal), the applicant (father) appeals from a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) made on 4 December 2019. The second respondent (mother) lodged a Notice of Cross-Appeal (Child Support) on 2 June 2020.
Background
The following background is taken from the Tribunal’s decision.
The father and the mother are the separated parents of two children. As at the date of the Tribunal’s decision, one child was aged 17 and the other was aged 11.[1]
[1] Tribunal decision (TD) [1]
A child support…
Continue reading Rodda v Child Support Registrar
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Rodda v Child Support Registrar [2020] FCCA 2472
- Case
- [2020] FCCA 2472
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the AAT had committed any reviewable error of law in its decision regarding the child support assessment. The applicant contended that the AAT's findings and conclusions were legally flawed, necessitating intervention by the Court.
Judge Driver considered the applicant's various grounds of appeal and found no basis for them. The Court determined that the AAT had not made any error of law in its assessment of the child support obligations. Consequently, the Court dismissed the applicant's amended notice of appeal. The Court also dismissed a notice of cross-appeal filed by the second respondent.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The applicant’s Amended Notice of Appeal (Child Support) lodged on 28 April 2020 and filed on 14 May 2020 is dismissed.
2.
The second respondent’s Notice of Cross-Appeal (Child Support) lodged on 2 June 2020 and filed on 4 June 2020 is dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.