RIDDELL
v
THE QUEEN[2022] HCASL 81
S10/2022
The applicant seeks an extension of time in which to file an application for special leave to appeal from a decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The application raises no apparent basis upon which to consider that the Court of Criminal Appeal's decision is attended by doubt such as to warrant a grant of special leave to appeal. Accordingly, it would be futile to grant the extension of time that is sought.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
S.J Gageler J.S Gleeson 20 April 2022
- AGLC
- Riddell v The Queen [2022] HCASL 81
- Case
- [2022] HCASL 81
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered whether the applicant had provided a sufficient basis to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. It was noted that the application for an extension of time did not provide any grounds that suggested doubt in the Court of Criminal Appeal's decision. Given this, the court held that it would be futile to grant the extension of time that was sought. Consequently, the application was dismissed.
The court found that the applicant had not demonstrated any apparent basis to suggest that the Court of Criminal Appeal's decision was attended by doubt. The court noted that the application for an extension of time did not present any grounds that would warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. Therefore, the court concluded that granting the extension of time would be futile. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), the Registrar was directed to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application. The order was signed by S.J. Gageler and J.S. Gleeson on 20 April 2022.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.