District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Regina v John Charles Hordern [2016] NSWDC 230 Hearing dates: 15 July 2016 Date of orders: 29 July 2016 Decision date: 29 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Judge AC Scotting Decision: 1. The offender is convicted.
2. The offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of six years with a non-parole period of four years to date from 29 August 2015. The offender is eligible to be released on parole on 28 August 2019.Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – assault – wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm - wounding
SENTENCE – plea of guilty – general deterrence – specific deterrence – mitigating factors – aggravating factors – use of dangerous weapon – violence – injury to victim – criminal history – standard non-parole period – special circumstances
OTHER – offender – background – use of illicit drugs –methyl-amphetamine – history of drug use – offending – effect of mental illness – depression – physical difficulties – health of offenderLegislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 s 33(1)(a)
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 ss, 5, 21A(2)(c), 21A(2)(d), 21A(2)(eb), 21A(3)(h), 21A(3)(i), 21A(3)(k), 22Cases Cited: Veen v R (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465
R v McNaughton (2006) 66 NSWLR 566
Baumer v R (1988) 166 CLR 51
BW v R [2011] NSWCCA 176
R v Wilkinson (No 5) [2009] NSWSC 432
R v Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383
R v Borkowski (2009) 195 A Crim R 1
Barbaro v The Queen (2010) 253 CLR 58
Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520
Palijan v R [2010] NSWCCA 142
R v Scognamiglio (1991) 56 A Crim R 81
R v Wright (1997) 93 A Crim R 48 and
R v Lawrence [2005] NSWCCA 91
R v Mitchell (2007) 177 A Crim R 97
R v Matzick [2007] NSWCCA 92
R v Esho [2001] NSWCCA 415
R v Zhang [2004] NSWCCA 358
R v Watt (Unreported, 2 April 1997, NSWCCA
R v Muldrock (2011) 244 CLR 120
R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346
R v Todorovic [2008] NSWCCA 49
R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67
R v Dickinson [2004] NSWCCA 457
R v Hampton [1999] NSWCCA 341
R v Proter [2015] NSWCCA 270
Newman v R [2015] NSWCCA 270Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown)
John Charles Horden (Offender)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
C Hyland, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) Limited
File Number(s): 2015/000253600
sentence
-
John Charles Hordern the offender appears for sentence after he pleaded guilty in the Local Court to one count of wound with intent to cause grievous bodily harm contrary to s 33(1)(a) of the Crimes Act 1900. The maximum penalty for the offence is 25 years imprisonment. The offence also carries a standard non-parole period of seven years.
-
The parties presented an agreed statement of facts that can be summarised as follows:
-
The offender had known the victim Kenneth Sharwood for about four months, they were both residents of…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Regina v John Charles Hordern and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2016] NSWDC 230
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to consider several legal issues, including the nature and circumstances of the assault, the use of a dangerous weapon, the extent of the injuries sustained by the victim, and the appellant's criminal history. Additionally, the court examined mitigating factors such as the appellant's background, drug use, and mental health issues, as well as aggravating factors like the violence of the offence and the potential for general and specific deterrence.
In delivering the sentence, the court emphasised the gravity of the offence, noting the use of a dangerous weapon and the severity of the injuries inflicted. The court acknowledged the appellant's history of drug use and mental health issues but found that these did not sufficiently mitigate the seriousness of the crime. The court also considered the need for deterrence and the appellant's potential for rehabilitation. Ultimately, the court determined that a sentence of six years imprisonment, with a non-parole period of four years, was appropriate, taking into account the factors discussed.
The final orders of the court were that the appellant be convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of six years, with a non-parole period of four years. The appellant is eligible for release on parole from 28 August 2019.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The offender is convicted.
2. The offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of six years with a non-parole period of four years to date from 29 August 2015. The offender is eligible to be released on parole on 28 August 2019.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.