Legal Research
Cases
Regina v Coulter

Regina v Coulter

Case [2005] NSWSC 101 24 February 2005

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

CITATION:
REGINA v. COULTER [2005] NSWSC 101

HEARING DATE(S): Friday 4 February 2005

JUDGMENT DATE :

24 February 2005

JURISDICTION:
Common Law

JUDGMENT OF:
Greg James J at 1

DECISION:
I sentence the offender to life imprisonment to date from 15 March 2004.

CATCHWORDS:
Murder - sentence - applicability of sentencing criteria - test for imposition of life sentence, "worst class of case" - relevance of offender's obsessive compulsive disorder pre-disposing him to commission of this and similar crimes - consideration of dangerousness.

LEGISLATION CITED:
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

CASES CITED:
Previtera (1997) 94 A. Crim. R. 76
Merritt [2004] NSWCCA 19
Penisini [2003] NSWSC 892
Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270
Harris (2000) 50 NSWLR 409
Aslett [2004] NSWSC 1228
Twala (CCA, unreported 4 November 1994)
Veen (No. 2) (1987) 164 CLR 465
Rose (1999) NSWCCA 327
Kalache (2000) 111 A. Crim. R. 152
El-Andouri [2004] NSWCCA 178
Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383
Garforth (CCA, unreported 23 May 1994)

PARTIES:
REGINA v. DAVID LIONEL JOHN COULTER

FILE NUMBER(S):
SC 2004/2899

COUNSEL:
Crown: W. Dawe, QC.
Offender: J. Stratton, SC.

SOLICITORS:
Crown: S. Kavanagh
Offender: S.E. O'Connor

LOWER COURT JURISDICTION:

- 23 -

IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COMMON LAW DIVISION
CRIMINAL LIST

GREG JAMES, J.

THURSDAY 24 FEBRUARY 2005

2004/2899

REGINA v. DAVID LIONEL JOHN COULTER

SENTENCE

1 HIS HONOUR: The offender, David Lionel John Coulter, on 5 November 2004 was arraigned before Barr, J. on which occasion he pleaded guilty to one count contained in an indictment presented against him that he did, on 15 March 2004, murder a young girl who, at the time, was aged just short of her twelfth birthday. When the matter came before me on 4 February 2005, the offender adhered to his plea.

2 I was provided with a victim’s impact statement which by common consent I treated as I am required to do by the statutory provisions and Regina v. Previtera (1997) 94 A. Crim. R. 76.

3 By consent, a statement of agreed facts was admitted into evidence.

4 Also tendered in evidence was an autopsy report, Exhibit D. It established the deceased had died as a result of smothering and had suffered sharp force cutting injuries to her throat, right thigh, chest and abdomen, involving gross mutilation and the extraction of her internal organs and heart. It is not necessary to further detail the brutal and savage treatment of her body. There was no evidence of any sexual interference with her.

5 The following matters appear from that statement of facts. The offender lived alone in Queanbeyan. At the time of his offence he was 41 years of age, having been born on 30 November 1962. The deceased’s mother was the offender’s first cousin. She was a single parent and had been so for some four years. The deceased and her brother had resided with their mother in a home unit in an inner Sydney suburb. The offender used to visit his cousin…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Continue reading Regina v Coulter

Details

AGLC: Regina v Coulter [2005] NSWSC 101
Case: [2005] NSWSC 101
Decision Date: 24 February 2005

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Regina v Coulter involved the defendant, Coulter, who was convicted of murder. The central issue in this appeal was the determination of the appropriate sentence to be imposed on Coulter, with a particular focus on whether the criteria for a life sentence were met. The case was heard in the High Court of Australia.

The legal issues before the court were the interpretation and application of sentencing criteria in the context of a murder conviction. Specifically, the court needed to determine whether the case constituted the "worst class" for which a life sentence would be appropriate. Additionally, the court had to consider the relevance of Coulter's pre-existing obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) in relation to his propensity to commit such crimes and whether his disorder could be seen as a mitigating factor. The dangerousness of Coulter was also a significant consideration in the sentencing.

In its decision, the court examined the circumstances of the crime and the characteristics of the offender. The court held that while Coulter's OCD was a significant factor in understanding his behaviour, it did not absolve him of responsibility for his actions. The court concluded that the case indeed fell within the "worst class" for which a life sentence would be appropriate, given the brutal nature of the crime and the risk of reoffending. The court emphasised that the primary consideration in imposing a life sentence was the gravity of the crime and the need to protect society, rather than the offender's mental health conditions. The appeal was dismissed, and the original sentence of life imprisonment was upheld.

Orders