Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Windlab Limited [2020] NSWSC 571 Hearing dates: 29 April 2020 Date of orders: 29 April 2020 Decision date: 14 May 2020 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Orders made convening scheme meeting.
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – Arrangements and reconstructions – Schemes of arrangement or compromise – Application under s 411 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for orders convening meeting of members to consider and, if thought fit, approve a proposed scheme of arrangement – Whether requirements to order scheme meeting are satisfied. Legislation Cited: - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Pt 2G.2, s 411, 1319
- Public Health Act 2010 (NSW)
- Public Health (COVID-19 Restrictions on Gathering and Movement) Order 2020
- Supreme Court (Corporations) Rules 1999 (NSW)Cases Cited: - Re Amcor Ltd [2019] FCA 346
- Re APN News & Media Ltd (2007) 62 ACSR 400
- Re Ardent Leisure Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1665
- Re Associated Advisory Practices Limited [2013] FCA 761
- Re Brambles Industries Ltd (2006) 59 ACSR 501
- Re Coles Group Limited (2007) 25 ACLC 1380
- Re CSR Ltd [2012] FCAFC 34; 183 FCR 358
- Re DuluxGroup Ltd [2019] FCA 961
- Re GBST Holdings Limited [2019] NSWSC 1280
- Re Healthscope Ltd [2019] FCA 542
- Re Hostworks Group Ltd (2008) 26 ACLC 137
- Re Investa Listed Funds Management Ltd as responsible entity for the Armstrong Jones Office Fund and the Prime Credit Property Trust [2018] NSWSC 1766
- Re Kidman Resources Ltd [2019] FCA 1226
Re Macquarie Capital Alliance Ltd (2008) 67 ACSR 484
- Re Macquarie Private Capital A Limited (2008) 26 ACLC 366
- Re Mitchell Communication Group [2010] VSC 423
- Re SFE Corporation Ltd (2006) 59 ACSR 82
- Re Simavita Holdings Limited [2013] FCA 1274
- Re Skilled Group Ltd (No 1) (2015) 113 ACSR 525
- Re Villa World Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1207Category: Principal judgment Parties: Windlab Limited (Plaintiff) Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
M Oakes SC (Plaintiff)
J Williams (Acquirer)
Dentons Australia (Plaintiff)
File Number(s): 2020/101207
Judgment
Background and affidavit evidence
-
By Originating Process filed on 2 April 2020 the Plaintiff, Windlab Limited (“Windlab”) seeks orders in respect of a scheme of arrangement which would provide for the acquisition of all ordinary shares in Windlab for cash by Wind Acquisition 2 Pty Ltd (“WA2”), excluding some 18.72% of Windlab’s shares which are held by Equity Trustees Limited and in which WA2 has a relevant interest. An order is sought, at this hearing, under s 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) that Windlab convene a meeting of members in respect of the scheme, and directions are also sought under s 1319 of the Act regarding the scheme.
-
By way of background, Windlab is a wind energy development company, with its head office in Canberra, and operations in Australia, South Africa and East Africa, which applies proprietary technology to identify, acquire and develop wind farms in Australia…
Continue reading Re Windlab Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Re Windlab Ltd [2020] NSWSC 571
- Case
- [2020] NSWSC 571
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the statutory requirements for convening a meeting under section 411, focusing on whether the application met the necessary conditions, including the need for the meeting to be in the best interests of the company and its members. The court examined the company's financial statements, the proposal for the scheme, and the potential benefits to the members. It also considered whether the scheme had been negotiated in good faith and whether it provided a better outcome than the company entering liquidation. The court concluded that the application satisfied the statutory requirements for ordering a scheme meeting.
Having found that the statutory requirements were satisfied, the court granted the order for the scheme meeting to be convened. The decision allows the members of Windlab Ltd to consider and vote on the proposed scheme of arrangement, which aims to restructure the company's debts and provide a more sustainable financial future. The order paves the way for the potential restructuring of the company, subject to approval by the members at the meeting.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.